BaseChain

16.9K posts

BaseChain banner
BaseChain

BaseChain

@BaseChain

Connoisseur of Collectibles Crypto - Coffee - Cocoa - Canna in no particular order

earth Sumali Ağustos 2017
2.9K Sinusundan3.2K Mga Tagasunod
S M O A K Y
S M O A K Y@smoak58·
@BaseChain @BravoCosto @vivid_ordinals Vivid has been consistent from day one, but "no second best" is binary and art is way more nuanced. AoB is still wide open. Canvas being stretched everyday and I don't feel there needs to be a single winner here now, or ever.
English
1
0
2
48
S M O A K Y
S M O A K Y@smoak58·
Gen-art on Bitcoin is the most underexplored corner of ordinals. An algorithm inscribed once, seeded infinitely, producing unique outputs that live permanently on the most secure ledger ever built. No server. No API. No rendering dependency. The art literally runs itself.
English
13
3
33
943
BaseChain
BaseChain@BaseChain·
Gm This is why I’m incredibly bullish on ordinals long term
BaseChain tweet media
English
2
0
7
377
Backseats
Backseats@backseats_eth·
I was ill prepared for how much of parenting is just saying, “take the {object} out of your mouth please”
English
3
0
11
354
Maning 💀🫡
Maning 💀🫡@Maniinng·
I love seeing @JrCasas_ cooking, even more when he includes me in his experiments! 😬 Planarics are here! Who wants one in 6 days?
Maning 💀🫡 tweet media
English
8
0
17
428
BaseChain
BaseChain@BaseChain·
@zentoshi69 kinda unfair satflow has been around for years nothing wrong with them charging a fee imo
English
1
0
2
110
zentoshi
zentoshi@zentoshi69·
turns out satflow are grifters too why would you put the fees on in the worst moment lol
English
13
0
24
2.8K
Brrrbon
Brrrbon@Brrrbon_·
@OCM_529 if an indexer stops recognizing parent-child tomorrow, does the collection still exist?
English
2
0
0
66
Brrrbon
Brrrbon@Brrrbon_·
parent-child proves lineage
wallet signatures prove key control
both are useful 
neither prove the human creator bitcoin can prove that an artifact exists
when it existed
and how it is linked to other artifacts but authorship is a different question authorship is human
and humans do not live natively inside protocol rules that part has always been social 
reputation
context
continuity
recognition
trust so when people act like parent-child and wallet history fully solve provenance 
they’re overstating what the chain can actually prove those systems can prove structure
they can prove linkage
they can prove custody they cannot fully prove the maker that’s why I anchor the human story to the work itself not just to a wallet
not just to an indexer
not just to a marketplace view because the closest thing to real provenance on bitcoin is not only proving that the work exists it is tying the existence of the work back to the human who made it
English
7
2
25
1.2K
BaseChain nag-retweet
lifofifo ◉
lifofifo ◉@lifofifo·
◉ Collector focused ◉ Protocol native ◉ Fully onchain collection data ◉ Indexer and explorer ◉ Open source …and a lot more ◉RD
lifofifo ◉ tweet media
English
271
283
1.1K
72K
SergeSats
SergeSats@SergeSats·
When one of Bitcoin’s top generative artists meets @BtcArtSociety in Kraków you either launch a new art movement or a new strain.
SergeSats tweet media
English
15
2
51
1.7K
BaseChain nag-retweet
Vivid Gallery
Vivid Gallery@vivid_ordinals·
3 Years Retrospective: How it began, what we've achieved so far, and the future ahead x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
7
11
25
998
BaseChain nag-retweet
Vivid Gallery
Vivid Gallery@vivid_ordinals·
With Magic Eden closing its Ordinals marketplace, we’ve chosen our next home for Vivid’s secondary market: @osura_com, built by @OnChainMonkey. Same mission, clearer fit: less trading, more provenance, transparency and long-term value. All Vivid collection pages coming soon🧡
Vivid Gallery tweet media
English
12
29
71
4.8K
Chad
Chad@chad33706·
Delegate inscription use cases? Are there any not involved with reproduction of the same thing? I’m still learning about it in the Ordinals space and am trying to understand how it’s of any use to an Ordinal framework? If anyone has thoughts, I’d appreciate it.
English
3
0
4
166