Cybird🦉

2.9K posts

Cybird🦉 banner
Cybird🦉

Cybird🦉

@Dispositionedar

Founder of @mars_birds exploring Mars

Sumali Ocak 2021
820 Sinusundan1.3K Mga Tagasunod
Cybird🦉
Cybird🦉@Dispositionedar·
tit for tat is my favorite way to play games
English
0
0
0
22
Cybird🦉
Cybird🦉@Dispositionedar·
"A man who is used to acting in one way never changes; he must come to ruin when the times, in changing, no longer are in harmony with his ways." - Niccolo Machiavelli
English
0
0
1
22
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
Midnight Foundation
Midnight Foundation@midnightfdn·
Midnight is live 🥳 Today marks the launch of the @MidnightNtwrk, a defining step forward in blockchain infrastructure and the realization of a fourth-generation architecture. Rather than forcing a trade-off between transparency and privacy, Midnight allows both to coexist. Developers can build applications where user data remains private, while key conditions can still be proven on-chain, unlocking entirely new design space across financial products, identity systems, and decentralized applications. Welcome to privacy by default, and disclosure by choice. Read the full announcement, including details on the network’s phased rollout designed to ensure stability, security, and long-term resilience as the ecosystem expands: x.com/MidnightNtwrk/…
Midnight Foundation tweet media
English
68
363
1.3K
26.8K
Cybird🦉
Cybird🦉@Dispositionedar·
@CashAnvil a lot more than anybody is willing to talk about. catalyst needs a lower budget, grants need a higher budget and more distribution across small teams/indie devs that get paid out based on milestones, and they need AI audits for past proposals to weed out grifters
English
1
1
3
98
$cash
$cash@CashAnvil·
And this is what people are currently doing…imagine all the skeletons in the closets of the entire time of catalyst. I think we have all laid some catalyst eggs. Big dreams for the idea, deliver on what you said, and very few people besides your local team actually use the product. These are the ones that I feel bad about. That said, never seen something submitted that’s completely unrelated pass. And I have had several milestone reviewers push back on what we’ve submitted. So this is a bit shocking but makes me think, how many more are out there like this?? Catalyst is supposed to be about taking risks, not the treasury. Let’s get wise this year and vote based on merit not flashiness.
phil@phil_uplc

It is very common for developers in this ecosystem to grift non-technical community members into believing they have produced useful technology or otherwise fulfilled their obligations when in actuality they just writing non-functional code in a void that is never intended to see use and publishing that code to Github to collect their catalyst milestone rewards with zero intention of actually delivering anything meaningful to the ecosystem or even actually delivering the milestones at all. The below is a great example of an egregious instance of this. Let us walk through each of the proposals that they have said are "completed" and explain the actual status of the proposals in a way that non-technical people can understand. zkFold x zkPass: Bring zkPass to Cardano Problem statement: Implementing data oracles is a critical problem in the blockchain space. Cardano currently lacks a universally accessible, cost-effective, decentralized, and reliable data oracle. Solution: zkPass is a leading cross-chain data oracle solution. Leveraging zkFold's expertise in Cardano smart contracts and ZKPs, we aim to integrate zkPass's robust data verification services on Cardano. By verifying zkPass proofs on-chain, users get an independent, unforgeable attestation of the validity of their private data. Currently, zkPass supports many EVM chains. By implementing zkPass proof verification contracts on Cardano, we enable Cardano users to access zkPass functionality from the comfort of their Cardano wallets. Wow that sounds great! zkPass is a massive oracle provider in the blockchain space, it would be huge for Cardano defi if we could have a means to verify zkPass proofs on Cardano. The proposal talks about how they will be teaming up with the zkPass team to deliver this functionality; that's a huge collaboration! The project was completed! They collected all milestones, a total of 250,000.00 ada. Great work! That must mean that we can verify zkPass oracle attestations on Cardano now! Or at the very least that zkPass team was involved in the delivery of this in some way as promised! Or that zkPass is integrated or used in some form somewhere in whatever they delivered? We should at-least have the following two components that were promised in the proposal right? 1. Onchain smart contract that can verify zkPass proofs 2. A JS library that integrates with zkPass's JS-SDK and contains the off-chain code for building Cardano transactions and querying attestation data from the blockchain. The following outputs were promised in the milestone delivery: 1. Client-side (browser) blockchain querying code 2. Finalized smart contract code (Haskell) 3. Finalized JS/TS library What did they actually deliver? Here is what they gave the in final proof of achievement: Link to Client-side (browser) blockchain querying code: github.com/zkFold/capital… Ah this must be the JS library code that queries the zkPass attestation data from the blockchain right? No. Well then what did they submit? What does this code do? It is a glorified geography trivia game. > This game tests your geography knowledge about countries and their corresponding capitals. A score between 0 and 5 is assigned to each trial. Does it at-least get any information from zkPass or consume zkPass data or have any relation to zkPass at all? No. It is a game that lets you answer questions about what the capital of each country is. What about the smart contract to verify zkPass oracle attestations? Here is what was linked in the final milestone, Link to Finalized smart contract code (Haskell): github.com/zkFold/zkpass-… Okay okay, the querying for zkPass attestations wasn't what we expected but surely the smart contract verifies zkPass attestations right? I mean look at the codebase, it's got a ton of lines of code, lots of super advanced terminology like "Plonk", "NonInteractiveProof" "ZKCircuits", "ZkPassToken"! The smart contract in the link above named `untypedZkPassToken` even says in its documentation that it is a "Plutus script (minting policy) for verifying zkpass computations on-chain." That sounds promising right! Even if we don't have the offchain code to get attestations, at-least we have the smart contract that can do it right? Wrong, this smart contract cannot verify zkPass attestations at all. Not a single one of them. Nada, zip, zilch. This smart contract is a generic verifier for plonk proofs that was copy pasted from another project. Plonk proof verifier! That sounds cool! So even if they didn't actually deliver a contract that can verify zkPass proofs at-least they made some progress on it? Or at the very least they attempted to do it? No. They did not. You see, zkPass oracle attestations come in the form of a JSON blob with ECDSA signatures no zk required, also importantly ZkPass DOESN'T USE PLONK AT ALL. Okay it is completely not related to zkPass in any way shape or form but `untypedZkPassToken` must be doing something right? What zkProof is this contract being used to verify? Prepare yourself for this, you are not ready for how amazing and advanced this is, and how valuable to the ecosystem it is: This is used to verify a zk proof that the number 5 is indeed the number 5. Sorry what? Yes, that is correct. It verify the identity function! This has nothing to do with zkPass or oracles at all. It verifies that if you have a function f(x) = x ie. that takes whatever you give it and gives it back to you without doing anything at all, then if you give it a number you will get that same number. Revolutionary! 250,000 Ada collected for a smart contract that verifies that 5 is equal to 5. Great work from the zkFold team! Okay, okay what about the final output that was promised the JS/TS library for interacting with zkPass JS-SDK. Surely this at-least is something remotely relevant to the proposal or at-least something that does something useful at all right? Unfortunately, no. Here is the link they provided for that output: Finalized JS/TS library: github.com/zkFold/zkpass-… Well what does this do? It is the exact same game that lets you answer questions about what the capital of each country is. Compare it to the repository that was submitted for the other output: github.com/zkFold/capital… You will notice they are exactly the same, except zk-pass-client has one additional commit from the CTO of ZkFold. What does that commit do? Nothing. Since it is the same code as the client code, does that mean it is a fork of the client code? No, instead of forking it, they downloaded the client code and manually pushed it into a new repository. This is a common trick that is used by developers to hide the fact that a project is a direct clone of another project. TLDR what do we have for 250,000 ada: 1. A guessing game 2. A smart contract that is used to verify the proof that 5 is equal to 5. 3. The same guessing game from output one, but in disguise. What does this show? This shows the ZkFold team does not care about actually delivering anything at all. They care about collecting catalyst milestones, and use their position as developers to lie about what work they have delivered in order to collect milestone payments and then let the project die slowly. Maybe they are still working on it? There has not been a single commit in 8 months. Did this project have anything to do with zkPass? No. Did it result in us being able to consume zkPass oracle data? No. Did it produce anything even remotely useful to anyone? No. Did anyone ever use any of this? No. This is fraud. I urge the catalyst team to review this evidence and draw their own conclusions on the above. I also urge all community members to review the above and see if you believe that zkFold is actually making any honest effort at all to deliver a zk rollup L2, or if they are repeating what they have done above, publishing vaporware crap code that does nothing to github repositories and marketing it "super advanced zero-knowledge proofs" to non-technical reviewers to collect milestone payments.

English
9
2
82
3.1K
$cash
$cash@CashAnvil·
Actually just in shock right now lol. Great opportunity gone. Not sure what happened. Not sure why it took 5 months to find out. Not sure why we had to define a scope of work for an entire project just to be ultimately rejected(and our work re-used for other applicants). Hoping when I see who was awarded the opportunity it’s not one of the same 5 teams picked to do everything on Cardano or a lowball offer. Sometimes I really wonder why we keep trying so hard and why things like this still surprise me after 4 years of non stop grinding to earn a name for ourselves. This shit is getting extremely repetitive and tiring.
English
41
13
166
8.8K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
Justin Bons
Justin Bons@Justin_Bons·
Unpopular opinion: Cardano did not go down last week! Most users were unable to use ADA for close to 14 hours due to third-party services shutting down Yet, despite a chain split, it was still possible to transact Therefore, ADA did not go "down", even if this was terrible: 🧵 This incident was almost as bad as it gets, yet no one lost funds & at worst were only delayed, as even the most basic blockchains are incredibly resilient! All because human beings are a part of that machine: Coordination Not Centralization: Coordination among validators during a crisis is not centralization; it is people fighting to preserve the network they love. As they are a part of that system! Blockchains are not mindless & autonomous machines; they are "cyborgs", as they are also made up of people The ADA validator community came together to solve this problem. Exactly as BTC, ETH, SOL & countless other chains have also done during times of crisis That does not imply that the chain in question is therefore centralized... No Downtime: I waited for the excellent post-mortem by @Quantumplation before commenting, so I suggest you read that if you are interested in the technical details. I realized straight away when reading it that I cannot, in all fairness, call this "downtime" In large part, because I also did not consider the issues SOL was having at the start of the year due to QUIC networking issues to be a form of "downtime" either. If blocks are being produced & it is still possible for advanced users to submit TXs, then the chain is not "down"! Consistency & Intellectual Honesty: As a crypto researcher, I value consistency highly; it is one of the core aspects required for solid rationality & reasoning. You might think I am wrong about a bunch of things, but I am no hypocrite. Intellectual honesty matters & I am not in the business of peddling inaccuracies for the sake of views In that vein, this was not "vibe coded" by a teenager either... The individual responsible is an ADA community member who is deeply regretful of his actions & he has apologized publicly FBI Involvement: The fact that Charles Hoskinson (ADA's founder) called the FBI on him is disgusting. If anything, they should give him a bug bounty... (I am being facetious here, as he did not disclose this responsibly) Nonetheless, calling the authorities & possibly pressing charges for this absolutely goes against the crypto ethos. Which instead should value permissionless innovation & not make the actions of engineers exploring the technology illegal... Humility: I wish that some parts of the ADA community would get off their high horse about the reality of validator coordination & the unknown unknowns we inevitably encounter with experimental blockchain tech I almost joined in on the ridicule to help drive that lesson home. I admit, I wish I could have said "ADA went down", purely for the poetic justice Despite this incident arguably being worse from a user perspective than the chain going "down" & recovering in under an hr... Given how some popular semantics are currently being used within the ADA community. The positive, humbling effect that would otherwise have been so healthy for the ADA community has been severely mitigated as a consequence of this "semantic propoganda game" As the lesson here should have been: Humility! 🕊 Unfortunately, certain individuals have managed to spin that lesson in the opposite direction, framing it as a victory, when, in blockchain terms, this was still a disaster One aspect of a truly decentralized blockchain is that you cannot decide who gets to be part of your chain, & that ultimately, it does not matter. So, we should also not read too much into the out-of-control egos of tribalistic individuals Conclusion: Validator coordination in response to a major bug is a normal aspect of how blockchains function We can choose to live in a fantasy or in reality. We must understand what a blockchain is, not only what we want it to be: The inevitability of bugs is a part of this; proportional to innovation & usage. The more innovative & novel a blockchain is, the more likely bugs will occur The same is also true for usage, which can expose unknown unknowns that even the best engineers might not have considered BTC had a considerably worse bug in 2010 that also resulted in a chain split. With one side maliciously printing billions of new BTC! Nothing like that happened here & BTC still survived. So ADA will be fine I want ADA to succeed & I am grateful the bug was not worse & that no major losses occurred Overall, ADA has a great community that values decentralization. The validators handled the crisis well, showing off their relative maturity Blockchains are anti-fragile. That means this incident has only made ADA stronger in the process! 💪
English
93
49
435
38.7K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Encrypted messaging, like @signalapp, is critical for preserving our digital privacy. Two important next steps for the space are (i) permissionless account creation and (ii) metadata privacy. @session_app and @SimpleXChat are two messaging apps pushing these directions forward. For this reason I've donated 128 ETH to each. Addresses available on their websites if you wish to follow on: getsession.org simplex.chat But also, actually download and use them! Neither of the two are perfect pieces of software, they have a way to go to get to truly optimal user experience and security. Strong metadata privacy requires decentralization, decentralization is hard, users expecting multi-device support makes everything harder. Sybil / DoS resistance, both in the message routing network and on the user side (without forcing phone number dependence) adds further difficulty. These problems need more eyes on them. I wish all teams working on these important problems best of luck.
English
799
1.1K
5.8K
935.7K
Jami Safari
Jami Safari@thinkgrowcrypto·
is XRP really more decentralized than Cardano? @grok said so...
Jami Safari tweet media
English
12
0
22
3.9K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
Solana
Solana@solana·
You do understand what I do for a living? I literally am a decentralized financial platform and rebuilt Wallstreet on a blockchain
English
760
340
3.9K
316.8K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
Charles Hoskinson
Charles Hoskinson@IOHK_Charles·
@R1chardMaur1ce You do understand what I do for a living? I literally make decentralized central banks and rebuilt Wallstreet on a blockchain
English
468
105
1.5K
1.9M
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
effectfully
effectfully@effectfully·
Thank you for everything @InputOutputHK 🫡 Talk to you through the bug bounty program.
effectfully tweet media
English
24
5
186
14.7K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
This is my mental model: if people choose to run a system that accepts arbitrary public messages, they are taking on the risk of what happens with any message they receive. If they chose to run a permissioned system and force each user to acknowledge the session and liability, that’s a different story. The former shouldn’t be regulated because it’s completely at will on both sides. Ultimately it’s your call.
English
14
8
142
32.4K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
effectfully
effectfully@effectfully·
@CashAnvil @KpunToN00b Right, good thing everyone knows exactly what my intents are and there's no room for misinterpretation.
English
1
3
81
2K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
effectfully
effectfully@effectfully·
Just submitted my resignation letter. I've fucked up pen testing in a major way once. I've seen my colleagues do the same. I didn't realize there was a risk of getting raided by the authorities because of that + saying mean things on the Internet. If the Cardano community wants me to continue securing the computational layer, it's gonna need to compensate me handsomely for the risk I had no idea I was taking on. For context, most vulns in the computational layer were either directly discovered by me or originated from my ideas.
Charles Hoskinson@IOHK_Charles

Cardano works so fast that we forked, fixed, and caught the guy all in one day. He was quite active in the Fake Fred discord. It was absolutely personal and now he's trying to walk it back because he knows the FBI is already involved

English
119
76
1.5K
316.4K
Cybird🦉 nag-retweet
Patrick Tobler
Patrick Tobler@Padierfind·
For the record: I highly disagree with everyone who's calling for authorities. Cardano is supposed to be secure. The code is supposed to be the law. If the code is flawed & you can do a transaction like this, then we (the Delegators + SPOs) are the ones responsible. Not the attacker. We cannot pretend to build a decentralized network that's supposed to replace nation states and then when someone finds a flaw and abuses it, call for said nation states to intervene.
big pey@bigpey

Straight to jail IMO

English
152
80
929
72.2K
Cybird🦉
Cybird🦉@Dispositionedar·
Hard to get real volume when tx fees and min ADA create so much friction. Since @MidnightNtwrk will now help SPOs cover the overhead, the economic excuse is gone. Time to ship tiered pricing and lower the entry costs. Cardano needs users way more than we need expensive security.
English
0
1
3
119
₳lex
₳lex@planetmaaz·
I’ve been saying this for less than a month brother. change. It’s gradual, then sudden. Draper ecosystem fund deal ✅ next step, onchain GA Ecosystem Funding Working Group voted in by Product Committee ✅ next step, finalisé TORs & execute Many other significant things à la Draper but with other verticals in the works. A flood is sudden and massive. Trust
English
3
0
13
342
₳lex
₳lex@planetmaaz·
a wave of creative destruction is soon upon cardano a flood for some, irrigation for others
English
3
1
21
1.2K