Fr. Markus Ramolla

@AsTheRain1 @austinemarie777 @DTCory Not true.

@austinemarie777 @FrRamolla @DTCory No one asked for private details. They just asked a reason for the warning. Even in general. Who are the "persons of reputable character" you're referring to? All that's been done is referring to unnamed "clergy" who have allegedly warned. We don't know who gave the warnings.

@FrRamolla @DTCory I count at least 6 different people in this thread asking why this man is to be avoided, and neither of you has given a reason, except "clergy have said, traditional bishops have said, etc." Maybe he should be avoided, but why no direct answer to the question?

@Soccermom013521 Good idea

@FrRamolla I don’t know Fr. Ramolla. There is a form on the site that is for Clerics & Religious. It allows you to send a message, maybe you could specify that you’d first like to know which bishops have registered their support?

10 Bishops now! 1600 signatures. USA has fallen behind Brazil. Let’s go, talk to your Priest Sunday. How can you not sign this, yet pray to God for a Pope? unamsanctam.org/open-letter

@D1870473838573 @Soccermom013521 The clergy need to vet these bishops whether they are legitimate.

@FrRamolla @Soccermom013521 Why do you want to know?

@AsTheRain1 @FourEyedEagle @D1870473838573 @DTCory It is. If many bishops and priests say the same, then there is obviously something to it.

@FrRamolla @FourEyedEagle @D1870473838573 @DTCory I have heard this also, but it's not relevant to the original warning about Frei Tiago, is it?

@FourEyedEagle @D1870473838573 @AsTheRain1 @DTCory This is true.

@D1870473838573 @AsTheRain1 @FrRamolla @DTCory Yeah, Bp. Da Silva is very criticised for ordaining and consrecrating priests and bishops without due diligence or caution. I have heard bishop Davila and other priests in Mexico say that

@TrinityJMJ @CathFamPodcast There are not in error.

@FrRamolla @CathFamPodcast We need it to correct the errors of pre 55 priest and bishops.

Hey folks let's remember that Unam sanctam is about attempting to find unity. Let's cool it with the attacks.... Let it breathe a bit. We are all on the same side. That's the point. We just need a Pope. Pray!

@TradCathSermons But it has to granted, cannot be by tacit will of the Pope nor by Ordination or Consecration!

Ordinary jurisdiction can be had without a diocese youtube.com/shorts/DtsbYLS…

@TradCathSermons It is either territorial or over a certain moral body. Traditional bishops are not possessing unlimited universal jurisdiction

@TradCathSermons It is no where found in any book nor in any theological manual!

@FrRamolla From the tacit will of all true popes or directly from Christ himself. Do you have a specific objection to this answer, Father? I know that answer has been provided already several times es, but you keep asking ...

@engl1shtradcat Friar Tiago is a wicked man, who lied for his holy orders, and abused dear friends of mine. He will face his day.

@PapaEgoLeoni @ArchAngelGabe76 Of course they do!

@ArchAngelGabe76 @FrRamolla Hmmm. I wonder if Rome considers your priests to have valid orders then.

Jurisdiction by tacit will of the Pope???

@PapaEgoLeoni @ArchAngelGabe76 Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

@ArchAngelGabe76 @FrRamolla Who ordained Bp Daniel Dolan?

@PapaEgoLeoni @ArchAngelGabe76 Excuse me! The commentary " CANON LAW A text and Commentary by T. Lincoln Bouscaren, S.J., and Adam C. Ellis, S.J. is from the 2nd edition 1953.

@FrRamolla @ArchAngelGabe76 You can use a commentary published after the 1917 code was promulgated by Benedict XV. Before that would be historical reference for that code. Gratian Decretum is a great historical reference, particularly with Alexander III’s and Gregory XIII’s adoption.

@PapaEgoLeoni @ArchAngelGabe76 Why not, I could use any other commentary before 1958

@ArchAngelGabe76 @FrRamolla Is he studying canon law history? The book is not a valid commentary on the 1917 code, which was promulgated before the last pope he recognizes as valid.

@PapaEgoLeoni @ArchAngelGabe76 What are you referring to?

@ArchAngelGabe76 @FrRamolla I realize he is a sede. I would be interested in the validity of his holy orders. Just very confusing. He doesn’t show commentary on the 1917 code? I thought his last valid he recognized was Pope Pius XII, after the 1917 code was promulgated.

@TradCathSermons @TheWMReview @HierB4TheAC @AbbeDutertre Really?

@FrRamolla @TheWMReview @HierB4TheAC @AbbeDutertre Your voice will not be heard unless you participate. Go!

One aspect of the "Imperfect General Council" talk: Some hold that, in the Great Western Schism, Benedict XIII showed himself to be a schismatic, and thus not the Pope, by his refusal to resign and allow the Council to elect an undoubted Pope. Effectively, his actions were construed as contrary to the good and unity of the Church, and thus evidence of schism. This is the principle to which some of the Council advocates have started referring. At the beginning of this debate, there were suggestions that any clergy who wouldn't "get with the programme" would effectively be left behind, because their faithful would abandon them. It has become more frequent and clearer. If the advocates of a Council follow through, and elect a papal claimant, this is what will happen. Those who don't accept their actions or arguments will be cast as schismatics and outside the Church. This is why I said the other day, and why @AbbeDutertre said yesterday: if this is where this movement is going, it should just go ahead and do it. Those who do not accept the theology or arguments are already unnecessary for the proposed Council and the election, and it seems clear that some of its advocates are laying the ground for an accusation of schism in the future. This makes the current period look like a kind of "two warnings" situation to establish the "pertinacity" of clergy who do not accept the IGC plans. Again, those who think that people don't notice that this is the way they are talking are mistaken. We see what you are doing. But if this is so, there is no need for those clergy who think like this, or for the agreement of laity who agree with them. Get on and do what you're going to do quickly, and have done with it.

@DTCory @AsTheRain1 Another traditional bishop in France warned about him. And there are many documents from Novus Ordo bishops warning about him, and this not because Tiago became traditional.

@DTCory @AsTheRain1 This has nothing to do with the thesis. Until recent, every serious bishop avoided him.

Frei Tiago is someone to be avoided, and he has been for some time even before these unfortunate statements.