ADM - ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿค“๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ๐Ÿ–•

265 posts

ADM - ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿค“๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ๐Ÿ–•

ADM - ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿค“๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ๐Ÿ–•

@KeepItFetchh

#

Sumali Ekim 2023
6 Sinusundan1 Mga Tagasunod
James Martell
James Martell@James_Martell_ยท
rightwingers: we need to protect Western culture! profs: ok let us then have mandatory philosophy, literature, & art courses from junior high through college, together with mandatory fluency on 3 Western languages instruction by the time you graduate rightwingers: not like that
English
865
1.6K
14.1K
805.5K
Justhurryup
Justhurryup@Justhurryu97206ยท
@KeepItFetchh @MysticalBoy22 @PalmyrPar Not true. The last Spider-Man movie had the same dp as Avatar and it still looks awful. If you don't film on location, or make a great set and then pay the VFX people peanuts the dp can't save you.
Justhurryup tweet media
English
1
0
4
233
Rec
Rec@Rec_A_Dorkยท
That is mostly because most franchises don't survive a Sonic 06 scale bomb. The fact that the franchise did, even with it's severely tarnished reputation, is a testament to the strength of the brand itself (Which frankly was the only thing Sammy cared about after taking over).
Shamaboy@Shamaboy11

There will never be a Sonic 06 equivalent for any other legacy franchise. Donโ€™t twist this with no bad entries for your favorite series. What I mean is that you will never get such a bad entry that completely redefined the series for the worst on every front for over 15 years

English
31
454
3.6K
73.1K
Zan
Zan@MysticalBoy22ยท
@PalmyrPar This is genuinely the most retarded thing i've read today. They're desperate because they hired a good DP? Are u fucking stupid lol?
English
2
2
458
12.4K
ADM - ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿค“๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ๐Ÿ–• nag-retweet
Jeff Brown
Jeff Brown@JeffBrownEnrealยท
I JUST SUED THE TORONTO STAR FOR FAILING TO PUBLICLY REVEAL INFORMATION SHARED BY THE RCMP RE: JUSTIN TRUDEAU AND UNDERAGE PORN After much reflection, I finally decided to begin my litigation process related to events arising from the experiences I wrote about in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen'. I'm not even talking about the more specific details/consequences I shared in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen.' (i.e. how the Star may have been negligent with respect to not telling my story). Those will be explored soon. I'm talking about the bigger picture consequences of media not sharing important details about political leadership with the citizenry. Oh, how we suffer in their absence. In this case, I begin with something shared with me (2021)ย  by then Toronto Star Journalist Robert Cribb, to the effect that the RCMP had informed them that then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was watching kiddie porn (underage porn) on his devices. It was their job to witness him, in order to ensure his devices weren't compromised by a foreign power. When asked (2022) if this story was going to go public, Cribb confirmed that the original source was credible, and affirmed that the story was coming ('where there's smoke, there's fire.'). It never came, and I believe it should have.ย I have struggled with this, and various other things shared with me by media, for a long time. At the link below is the filing itself, for anyone interested in following the story. It is for the court to decide, but it is my view that the Star, particularly in a situation where they are receiving funds from the government, had a fiduciary duty to bring this information to the Canadian public. It is surely in the public interest, and sharing it may well have made a huge difference with respect to cultivating the best outcome for Canadians.ย I explain more of my view in the documents. @dkennedyglans @MelanieBennet_ @TheMenzoid @ezralevant @scoopercooper @CandiceMalcolm @DavidKrayden @RealAndyLeeShow @LichTamara @JaneBrownNews @AlexpiersonAMP @cbcwatcher dropbox.com/scl/fi/2bywhzfโ€ฆ
English
437
2.7K
7.6K
1.4M
James Martell
James Martell@James_Martell_ยท
@dmr1619 yeah, trust the politicians & billionaires making you think that teachers and scholars are your enemy... it's working amazingly, buddy
English
137
6
565
53.6K
Samson Corwell
Samson Corwell@SamsonCorwellยท
@Tusharufo2 Rousseau says that the decisions made by the legislatorโ€”or even by a majorityโ€”are not necessarily the expressions of the General Will.
English
1
0
1
111
Tushar
Tushar@Tusharufo2ยท
If Rousseauโ€™s theory is taken as true, then on what basis can we even call one government authoritarian and another not, when everything a ruler does is supposedly backed by implied consent?
lever action lesbian ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธโ˜ง@amovy0

@Jonloe9 read Rousseau's The Social Compact. even the first like 10 pages. you will immediately understand that that's not remotely what the theory is lmao

English
3
4
49
1.3K
ADM - ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿค“๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŽฎ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ๐Ÿ–• nag-retweet
FabianLiberty
FabianLiberty@FabianLibertyยท
The problem with this logic is that it fails to recognize that the entire reason we're having this conversation is because the left has changed the definition of the word "right." Healthcare is obviously good, but calling it a "social good" would only cause the left to make the term "Healthcare" mean socialized medicine, and then the subversion would have to be combatted again. These lies of the socialist are nothing new. In Frederick Bastiat's 1850 essay, The Law, he writes; "Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by the government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain."
sonch@soncharm

Every time something like this pops up we get a round from the libertarian fraction making the โ€˜if it requires labor of others it canโ€™t be A Rightโ€™ point. Which, to be clear, I agree with!, but gets kind of old (and many just *will never* buy into) I think really what we need is a word different from โ€˜rightโ€™ to refer to such things. Okay, so health care isnโ€™t/canโ€™t be โ€˜a rightโ€™. But itโ€™s still good! And we want everyone to have it! At least to some basic level. That would be good, right? We all agree? Maybe โ€˜social goodโ€™? Health care is a social good.

English
2
1
12
330