John 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Keir Starmer has resigned

We are expecting yet another hit piece in the establishment media today against Restore Britain. This time because of the following comparison included on a Restore Britain Makerfield leaflet. ‘I agree with ‘Reform UK Deputy Leader’ Richard Tice that Britain becoming minority White British by 2063 is not a problem because he will be “long gone”.’ vs ‘I agree with Restore Britain that demographic change and mass immigration must be reversed before Britain is changed forever.’ Restore Britain is right. The country is on track to become minority White British, and clearly that is a stark demonstration of how mass immigration from the third world has transformed our country forever. Do we want our grandchildren to grow up in a country that is overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslim or Afghan? No - obviously not. To hold these concerns is in no way racist, as we’re being accused of. Again. This is just demographic reality - particularly with the growth of Islam, and the associated birth rates. The Muslim population is growing at a rapid pace that will, at some stage, become the majority. It’s a fact. And sadly, as we have seen elsewhere, the Muslim population does not need to become the majority before every demand is met. I understand no other politician wants to touch any of this, particularly in Reform, but unless we find the courage to do so - it is an inevitability. Restore Britain’s programme of mass deportations will reverse the demographic change. Through deporting all illegal migrants, and those foreign nationals who hate our way of life, cannot speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing and commit crime. That is Restore Britain’s position - as I have said repeatedly from day one. We are working on an overall estimate for that number, but it will be many millions. To the journalist who is trying to shame us - there is my response. I make no apologies for it. I stand by every Restore Britain position on that leaflet. Publish away.

We are expecting yet another hit piece in the establishment media today against Restore Britain. This time because of the following comparison included on a Restore Britain Makerfield leaflet. ‘I agree with ‘Reform UK Deputy Leader’ Richard Tice that Britain becoming minority White British by 2063 is not a problem because he will be “long gone”.’ vs ‘I agree with Restore Britain that demographic change and mass immigration must be reversed before Britain is changed forever.’ Restore Britain is right. The country is on track to become minority White British, and clearly that is a stark demonstration of how mass immigration from the third world has transformed our country forever. Do we want our grandchildren to grow up in a country that is overwhelmingly Pakistani Muslim or Afghan? No - obviously not. To hold these concerns is in no way racist, as we’re being accused of. Again. This is just demographic reality - particularly with the growth of Islam, and the associated birth rates. The Muslim population is growing at a rapid pace that will, at some stage, become the majority. It’s a fact. And sadly, as we have seen elsewhere, the Muslim population does not need to become the majority before every demand is met. I understand no other politician wants to touch any of this, particularly in Reform, but unless we find the courage to do so - it is an inevitability. Restore Britain’s programme of mass deportations will reverse the demographic change. Through deporting all illegal migrants, and those foreign nationals who hate our way of life, cannot speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing and commit crime. That is Restore Britain’s position - as I have said repeatedly from day one. We are working on an overall estimate for that number, but it will be many millions. To the journalist who is trying to shame us - there is my response. I make no apologies for it. I stand by every Restore Britain position on that leaflet. Publish away.

>becomes prime minister >wins largest majority seen in labour history >pivots the party hard right, cracks down on palestinian protestors and privacy rights >completely destroys the labour party >resigns what was bro doing any of this for

Burnham’s economic architect Miatta Fahnbulleh recommends, among other things: •A wealth tax and yet another windfall tax on oil and gas. •Mass nationalisation e.g. of land, transport, and energy. •Extending national insurance to investment income. •A cap on interest rates and charges on every form of consumer credit. •Hiking capital gains tax to income tax levels. •Hiking divided tax to income tax levels. •Abolition of the upper earnings limit for national insurance. •Huge expansion of the benefits system including a “minimum income guarantee” paid to everyone apart from the rich. •Nationalisation of banks and creation of new “green” banks with taxpayer funds. •Block on private banks lending to anyone with a “large amount of greenhouse gas emissions” and “penalisation of banks that provide too many carbon-intensive loans.“ •Forced sale of existing businesses to employees. •A tripling of the stamp duty surcharge to 9% for multiple homeowners and an increase to 6% for non-residents.

There are two worrying aspects to this New Statesman article: 1. Andy Burnham apparently doesn't have many brains. 2. Miatta Fahnbulleh is filling the gap. Quasi-Marxist Miatta Fahnbulleh, who wants a wealth tax, widespread nationalisation inc. banks, land, transport & energy & the forced sale of existing firms to employees, is one of the worst people to put in charge of economic policy. She's a high tax fanatic tax who wants there to be 'free basic energy' & for state owned companies to flood the energy market. 1/3

Amazing level of BS is behind the estimate of 250,000 white girls victimized by "Muslim rape gangs." What they did was: 1) Come up with a number for Telford, Oxford, and Rotherham, the center of the scandal 2) Extrapolate to the rest of the country Imagine if, to calculate murders in America, you looked at Detroit, Chicago, and Baltimore and then assumed all of America has the same murder rate. But wait, there's more! Even the original numbers are nonsense. To get the original estimate for Oxford, they included all supposed victims of sexual exploitation or grooming, by Muslims or anyone else. This means that they assumed 100% of victims were white girls and 100% of the perpetrators were Muslims for all cases of sexual exploitation! The report also switches between saying there were 250,000 victims, and 250,000 instances of victimization, without any explanation why. For Telford, they went back 40 years, though I don't think that there were Muslim rape gangs in the 1980s. The Oxford number includes all instances of "grooming," whether or not they involved sexual contact at all, and not much is shared about the methodology. It is a complete guess. I often hear rightists say "the liberals lie so I don't believe anything." What conclusion are we supposed to draw from the fact that rightists are this indifferent to facts?