LokoRabbit

A questão mais importante para o Brasil deveria ser conseguir uma saída para o Pacífico. Os Estados Unidos lutaram muito para conseguir isso. E o motivo é muito simples: somente um país com acesso ao Pacífico e ao Atlântico ao mesmo tempo pode ser a passagem entre Oriente e Ocidente, ou seja, tornar-se o novo Império de Roma. Atualmente, isso é ainda mais evidente. Toda a política chinesa está ancorada no controle e guerra comerciais. Um país que pudesse conectar o Mar da China com o Atlântico se tornaria o eixo da política internacional. Projetos como a Transoceânica tornam essa realidade palpável, mas inserir infraestrutura de escoamento de produção sem ter o domínio político de todos os territórios dentro da cadeia logística é necessariamente se tornar refém da potência com maior soft power nessas regiões. O Porto de Tumaco deveria ser do Brasil.

La pregunta es fútil. Todos los países tienen derecho a existir. Habiendo resuelto eso, el problema está en las "tierras ancestrales". Sabemos que desde esa visión mesiánica -expresada en El Gran Israel- que corre del Nilo al Eufrates, lo usan los ultraradicales para apropiarse de terrenos que son de otros países, desde Palestina, Egipto, etc. Desde esa visión, lo que seguiría es la invasión y anexión de territorio de Líbano, Jordania. Ya ni hablemos de la alucinación del argumento bíblico.

Everyone who says it doesn’t matter if Iran acquires nuclear weapons should have a serious conversation with reality. “It’s just a small bomb somewhere far away.” “Iran has the right to defend itself.” “It’s only Israel that has a problem.” No. It’s our problem. Everyone’s problem. And to all those who still claim “Iran didn’t even have nuclear weapons” or “they weren’t even close”… Wake up. According to the IAEA, before the attacks in 2025 Iran had accumulated hundreds of kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% - only a small technical step away from the 90% needed to make nuclear weapons. That was enough to produce material for several bombs in a very short time. Denying this is either naive or deliberate misinformation. Before Trump, seven Democratic and Republican presidents said that Iranian extremists must be prevented from getting their hands on these weapons of mass destruction. Now the media and the Democrats suddenly seem indifferent. That tells you everything about what is really going on. Because it is now Trump who has acted decisively and put a stop to the threat, it is suddenly “wrong.” The same political move, the same objective that previous presidents have had, is being condemned simply because the man behind it is named Donald Trump. It is not about the actual political decision or about protecting the West from a nuclear-armed theocracy. It is about a deep, personal, emotional, and media-created hatred of one man - a hatred so strong that it overrides logic, security policy, and common sense. A nuclear-armed Iran would give the Iranian regime - and its allied militias - a military immunity that no other power in the Middle East possesses. They could threaten and control the entire region, threaten Europe with rockets and terrorism, and do whatever they wanted without any real resistance. And if they were to honestly say out loud what their dream is, it is not only about Israel. It is about a Shia caliphate, where people like you and me become second-class citizens in our own Europe. Those who close their eyes to this are the same people who never want to talk about the obvious connection: the left-wing naivety and the genuinely anti-Western attitudes that today actively support the Islamic movement in Europe. They actually share a common project: to break down the traditional family - the foundation of society - economic self-determination (freedom instead of control), and the Western civilization as we know it. That is why we all should all be deeply grateful that Donald Trump is back in the White House. So thank you - because someone finally dares to act instead of just talking nicely about - and defending against real threats that can change our children’s future forever. This is not a distant Middle Eastern conflict. It is an existential threat to the world we want to pass on. ❤️‍🔥🪽