Master_Debunker (@Master_Debunker) - Twitter Profile

⏩️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ⏪️ ❌️ VERIFIED FALSE CLAIMS This is NOT from Chittagong, Bangladesh. This is a real abduction reported from Rahim Yar Khan, South Punjab, Pakistan (late April 2026). Multiple Pakistani news sources and social media reports describe a 14-year-old girl who was allegedly drugged (made to smell an intoxicating substance), then abducted in broad daylight in a crowded area. CCTV footage of the dragging/incident went viral. Police registered a case and launched an investigation. Religion not confirmed as Hindu. Pakistani reports refer to her simply as a "14-year-old girl." No credible sources specify her faith or frame it as communal targeting. The post adds "Hindu girl" and the Bangladesh persecution angle without evidence. For comparison: There was a separate April 22, 2026 abduction of a 14-year-old Class 10 girl in Uttara (Dhaka), Bangladesh—taken by 6–7 men in a car in front of her father. She was rescued on May 1, and the alleged mastermind was arrested. That case does not match the video (no motorcycle, different number of perpetrators, different method). It was not described as "drugged" or Hindu-specific in mainstream coverage. OUTCOME: Police investigation ongoing.

Ramesh Tiwari@rameshofficial0

🚨Heartless Bangladesh: 14-Year-Old Hindu Girl Kidnapped in Broad Daylight Heart breaking : A 14-year-old minor Hindu girl was allegedly drugged and forcibly dragged away in Chittagong, Bangladesh. The horrifying abduction was captured on CCTV footage, which has now gone massively viral. This shocking incident once again exposes the dangerous reality faced by Hindu minorities in Bangladesh. How long will Hindus continue to suffer in silence? Demand immediate rescue, justice, and protection for vulnerable girls NOW!

English

0

29

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·4h

⏩️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ⏪️ ❌️ VERIFIED FALSE CLAIMS This is NOT from Chittagong, Bangladesh. This is a real abduction reported from Rahim Yar Khan, South Punjab, Pakistan (late April 2026). Multiple Pakistani news sources and social media reports describe a 14-year-old girl who was allegedly drugged (made to smell an intoxicating substance), then abducted in broad daylight in a crowded area. CCTV footage of the dragging/incident went viral. Police registered a case and launched an investigation. Religion not confirmed as Hindu. Pakistani reports refer to her simply as a "14-year-old girl." No credible sources specify her faith or frame it as communal targeting. The post adds "Hindu girl" and the Bangladesh persecution angle without evidence. For comparison: There was a separate April 22, 2026 abduction of a 14-year-old Class 10 girl in Uttara (Dhaka), Bangladesh—taken by 6–7 men in a car in front of her father. She was rescued on May 1, and the alleged mastermind was arrested. That case does not match the video (no motorcycle, different number of perpetrators, different method). It was not described as "drugged" or Hindu-specific in mainstream coverage. OUTCOME: Police investigation ongoing.

English

0

73

Ramesh Tiwari@rameshofficial0·18h

🚨Heartless Bangladesh: 14-Year-Old Hindu Girl Kidnapped in Broad Daylight Heart breaking : A 14-year-old minor Hindu girl was allegedly drugged and forcibly dragged away in Chittagong, Bangladesh. The horrifying abduction was captured on CCTV footage, which has now gone massively viral. This shocking incident once again exposes the dangerous reality faced by Hindu minorities in Bangladesh. How long will Hindus continue to suffer in silence? Demand immediate rescue, justice, and protection for vulnerable girls NOW!

English

22

485

571

11.1K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·4h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ✅️ VERIFIED TRUE Accused: Father Farman (35) and his brother (the uncle) Asif (22). Some reports use the full names Mohammad Farman and Mohammad Asif. Timeline: The uncle (Asif) repeatedly sexually assaulted the girl over about four months and threatened to kill her if she spoke. Circle Officer (CO) Dr Ravishankar said the incident occurred when the girl was sleeping alone at the house and her aunt was away. When she confided in her father (Farman), he raped her as well. The girl’s mother had left the family years earlier. She eventually told her maternal aunt, who took her to Kotwali police station on April 30, 2026. Police action: Both men were arrested the same day (April 30). An FIR was registered under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences). The girl’s statement is being recorded, and a medical examination was conducted. Additional Superintendent of Police Siddharth K Mishra and SHO Brijesh Kumar Sharma confirmed the arrests and ongoing investigation.

Team Hindu United@TeamHinduUnited

A 14-year-old Muslim girl was raped by her uncle Mohammad Arif in Muzaffarnagar. When the brave girl told her father Mohammad Farman, he also raped her. Police have arrested both.

English

0

19

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·4h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ✅️ VERIFIED TRUE Accused: Father Farman (35) and his brother (the uncle) Asif (22). Some reports use the full names Mohammad Farman and Mohammad Asif. Timeline: The uncle (Asif) repeatedly sexually assaulted the girl over about four months and threatened to kill her if she spoke. Circle Officer (CO) Dr Ravishankar said the incident occurred when the girl was sleeping alone at the house and her aunt was away. When she confided in her father (Farman), he raped her as well. The girl’s mother had left the family years earlier. She eventually told her maternal aunt, who took her to Kotwali police station on April 30, 2026. Police action: Both men were arrested the same day (April 30). An FIR was registered under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences). The girl’s statement is being recorded, and a medical examination was conducted. Additional Superintendent of Police Siddharth K Mishra and SHO Brijesh Kumar Sharma confirmed the arrests and ongoing investigation.

English

2

7

491

Team Hindu United@TeamHinduUnited·18h

A 14-year-old Muslim girl was raped by her uncle Mohammad Arif in Muzaffarnagar. When the brave girl told her father Mohammad Farman, he also raped her. Police have arrested both.

English

286

1.6K

3.3K

47.9K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·11h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ VIDEO CLAIM FALSE This footage is from a protest outside the Ministry of Justice in London by supporters of Palestine Action (a direct-action group focused on Palestine/Israel issues). The UK government designated Palestine Action as a terrorist organization (proscribed in 2025). Expressing support for it even peacefully with signs saying things like "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action" is treated as supporting a banned terrorist group under UK terrorism laws. Protesters (dozens of them) were arrested for this exact reason. The mannequin was simply a protest prop holding one of those signs. Police treated it the same way they treated human protesters with identical placards.

English

0

1

5

1K

Yossi BenYakar@YossiBenYakar·18h

British police have reached a new low. 30 officers were sent to arrest a mannequin, because it hurt Muslim feelings. This is not satire. The police have completely lost the plot.

English

3.4K

19.5K

58.3K

1.9M

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·11h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ FAKE - AI GENERATED AI-generated. It was created by adding the woman on the floor and the stomping/abuse elements to an original video of the soldier simply dancing in uniform. - Real original clips of this show normal dancing TikTok content with no victim or violence. - The manipulated/AI version started circulating on social media around March 2026 and was quickly identified as fake by fact-checkers and observers. This is a common pattern in Israel-Hamas war misinformation: real or unrelated videos get AI-edited or deepfaked to create shocking evidence of atrocities, then go viral to fuel outrage. There are documented real cases of inappropriate behavior by some IDF soldiers, including old dancing videos from years ago, but this specific clip is not one of them.

Tony Pakistani Irani۔ 🇵🇰 🇮🇷@ghost_yar

فلسطینی خاتون پر تشدد اور اسرائیلی فوجی خاتون کی ٹک ٹاک براہ کرم فلسطین کے بارے میں بات کرنا بند نہ کریں... سپورٹ کے لیے فالو کرنا نہ بھولیں۔

English

1

0

45

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·11h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ FAKE - AI GENERATED AI-generated. It was created by adding the woman on the floor and the stomping/abuse elements to an original video of the soldier simply dancing in uniform. - Real original clips of this show normal dancing TikTok content with no victim or violence. - The manipulated/AI version started circulating on social media around March 2026 and was quickly identified as fake by fact-checkers and observers. This is a common pattern in Israel-Hamas war misinformation: real or unrelated videos get AI-edited or deepfaked to create shocking evidence of atrocities, then go viral to fuel outrage. There are documented real cases of inappropriate behavior by some IDF soldiers, including old dancing videos from years ago, but this specific clip is not one of them.

English

0

208

Tony Pakistani Irani۔ 🇵🇰 🇮🇷@ghost_yar·1d

فلسطینی خاتون پر تشدد اور اسرائیلی فوجی خاتون کی ٹک ٹاک براہ کرم فلسطین کے بارے میں بات کرنا بند نہ کریں... سپورٹ کے لیے فالو کرنا نہ بھولیں۔

اردو

90

520

398

21.4K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·11h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ FALSE CLAIMS The woman’s name is Kaynat Faruki / कायनात फारुकी (sometimes spelled Kayanat). Husband’s name is Bilal alias Shenki / Sheki / Shekhni / शेंकी. She filed a written complaint at Gangnahar Kotwali (Roorkee) a few days ago (around 28–29 April 2026) accusing him (and some family members) of assault, mental torture, and gun threats. Police have registered the case and are investigating. CCTV of the beating is part of the evidence. Multiple Uttarakhand/Hindi news outlets (Dainik Bhaskar, ETV Bharat, Zee News, TV9, etc.) have reported her complaint, the viral video, and the allegations.

Team Hindu United@TeamHinduUnited

A Muslim man beat his wife because she opposed his second marriage in Roorkee. He allegedly threatened to shoot her with a gun. His family defended it saying “it’s our custom to marry multiple women.” The woman is now begging for justice.

English

0

74

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·11h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ FALSE CLAIMS The woman’s name is Kaynat Faruki / कायनात फारुकी (sometimes spelled Kayanat). Husband’s name is Bilal alias Shenki / Sheki / Shekhni / शेंकी. She filed a written complaint at Gangnahar Kotwali (Roorkee) a few days ago (around 28–29 April 2026) accusing him (and some family members) of assault, mental torture, and gun threats. Police have registered the case and are investigating. CCTV of the beating is part of the evidence. Multiple Uttarakhand/Hindi news outlets (Dainik Bhaskar, ETV Bharat, Zee News, TV9, etc.) have reported her complaint, the viral video, and the allegations.

English

0

271

Team Hindu United@TeamHinduUnited·1d

A Muslim man beat his wife because she opposed his second marriage in Roorkee. He allegedly threatened to shoot her with a gun. His family defended it saying “it’s our custom to marry multiple women.” The woman is now begging for justice.

English

184

2.9K

7.2K

118.7K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·12h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ✅️ CLAIMS DEBUNKED Quran never names the Pharaoh or locks it to Ramesses II. That’s your assumption. Exodus dating is heavily debated among historians no consensus Pharaoh. 10:92 doesn’t say mummy in a museum. It says at the moment of drowning: Today We will preserve your body so you become a sign for those after you. Classical tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, al-Tabari): body washed ashore so Israelites could see he died not a god. Fulfilled literally. Saying the Bible is ambiguous and Pharaoh didn’t drown, only his army/host. That’s modern retrofitting. For centuries Jews & Christians read Exodus 14 + Psalm 136:15 as Pharaoh perishing with his forces (“overthrew Pharaoh and his army”). Shake off reinterpretation is new cope to dodge the Quran’s clarity. No historical contradiction: Quran gives extra detail the Bible lacks. It doesn’t require a specific mummy or contradict recoverable bodies. Claiming no New Kingdom Pharaoh drowned ignores that the Quran isn’t doing your chronology homework for you. Ties to “Islamic Dilemma” flop too. Quran confirms truth in prior scriptures + prophecies of Muhammad (not every 7th-century copy). It’s muhaymin (criterion) over them (5:48), corrects distortions (2:79 textual, 3:78 verbal), and 10:94 verifies the Prophet’s message against true revelation. Quran isn’t confirming errors it corrects them.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones@InspiringPhilos

Big error in the Quran

English

0

2

63

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·12h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ✅️ CLAIMS DEBUNKED Quran never names the Pharaoh or locks it to Ramesses II. That’s your assumption. Exodus dating is heavily debated among historians no consensus Pharaoh. 10:92 doesn’t say mummy in a museum. It says at the moment of drowning: Today We will preserve your body so you become a sign for those after you. Classical tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, al-Tabari): body washed ashore so Israelites could see he died not a god. Fulfilled literally. Saying the Bible is ambiguous and Pharaoh didn’t drown, only his army/host. That’s modern retrofitting. For centuries Jews & Christians read Exodus 14 + Psalm 136:15 as Pharaoh perishing with his forces (“overthrew Pharaoh and his army”). Shake off reinterpretation is new cope to dodge the Quran’s clarity. No historical contradiction: Quran gives extra detail the Bible lacks. It doesn’t require a specific mummy or contradict recoverable bodies. Claiming no New Kingdom Pharaoh drowned ignores that the Quran isn’t doing your chronology homework for you. Ties to “Islamic Dilemma” flop too. Quran confirms truth in prior scriptures + prophecies of Muhammad (not every 7th-century copy). It’s muhaymin (criterion) over them (5:48), corrects distortions (2:79 textual, 3:78 verbal), and 10:94 verifies the Prophet’s message against true revelation. Quran isn’t confirming errors it corrects them.

English

1

0

1

222

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones@InspiringPhilos·16h

Big error in the Quran

English

46

83

580

13.4K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·12h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ✅️ CLAIMS DEBUNKED 1. 2:41/4:47: Quran says it confirms that which is already with you → the truth remaining in prior revelations + prophecies of Muhammad. It does NOT endorse the texts as they stood in 7th c. (see 2:79, 4:46, 5:13 accusing distortion). 2. 5:43-47 (also 5:66-68): Rebukes Jews/Christians for ignoring what Allah actually revealed to them (true Torah/Gospel). Commands them to judge by authentic revelation which would lead them to accept the Quran (5:48 right after calls Quran muhaymin: guardian/criterion over prior books). 3. 2:85: Condemns selective belief (part of the Scripture... disbelieve in part) within their own books. Does NOT prove the physical texts were uncorrupted wholesale. 4. 10:94: Rhetorical/hypothetical: if you (Muhammad) doubt, ask those who read prior scripture. It's about confirming his prophethood matches true prophecies not making the Bible the judge of Quran. 5. 6:115: None can alter His words = Allah's decrees, promises & laws are unchangeable. Does NOT mean humans can't tamper with physical books. Quran explicitly accuses textual forgery elsewhere (2:79: write the scripture with their own hands then say this is from Allah). 6. 3:78: Yes, mentions verbal twisting with tongues. But Quran ALSO condemns textual changes (2:79 above + 2:75, 5:15, 4:46). Tahrif = both verbal and written distortion. Quran affirms original revelations to Moses & Jesus while correcting corruptions & positioning itself as final arbiter. No unknowing contradiction revelation is from Allah who knows all.

GodLogic_GL@GodLogic_GL

That the Quran confirms our scriptures: - It confirms the scriptures WITH the Jews and Christians at Muhammad's time (S. 2:41 / 4:47) - It commands us to follow our scriptures and judge by them (S. 5:43-47, 5:66-68) - PARTIAL belief in these books is condemned, so it's WHOLESALE confirmation (S. 2:85) - It teaches that the standard of truth for Muhammad is the prior revelation (S. 10:94) - It teaches that NOBODY can change the words of Allah (S. 6:115) - The condemnation is that we twist these books VERBALLY, not textually (S. 3:78) So the Quran confirms the entirety of the text of our scriptures, then (unknowingly) contradicts them (example: Surah 9:30 VS John 10:36 on Christ being the Son of God) because Muhammad never read them and assumed he was in line with them because he believed he was a prophet.

English

0

1

36

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·12h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ✅️ CLAIMS DEBUNKED 1. 2:41/4:47: Quran says it confirms that which is already with you → the truth remaining in prior revelations + prophecies of Muhammad. It does NOT endorse the texts as they stood in 7th c. (see 2:79, 4:46, 5:13 accusing distortion). 2. 5:43-47 (also 5:66-68): Rebukes Jews/Christians for ignoring what Allah actually revealed to them (true Torah/Gospel). Commands them to judge by authentic revelation which would lead them to accept the Quran (5:48 right after calls Quran muhaymin: guardian/criterion over prior books). 3. 2:85: Condemns selective belief (part of the Scripture... disbelieve in part) within their own books. Does NOT prove the physical texts were uncorrupted wholesale. 4. 10:94: Rhetorical/hypothetical: if you (Muhammad) doubt, ask those who read prior scripture. It's about confirming his prophethood matches true prophecies not making the Bible the judge of Quran. 5. 6:115: None can alter His words = Allah's decrees, promises & laws are unchangeable. Does NOT mean humans can't tamper with physical books. Quran explicitly accuses textual forgery elsewhere (2:79: write the scripture with their own hands then say this is from Allah). 6. 3:78: Yes, mentions verbal twisting with tongues. But Quran ALSO condemns textual changes (2:79 above + 2:75, 5:15, 4:46). Tahrif = both verbal and written distortion. Quran affirms original revelations to Moses & Jesus while correcting corruptions & positioning itself as final arbiter. No unknowing contradiction revelation is from Allah who knows all.

English

1

4

73

GodLogic_GL@GodLogic_GL·14h

That the Quran confirms our scriptures: - It confirms the scriptures WITH the Jews and Christians at Muhammad's time (S. 2:41 / 4:47) - It commands us to follow our scriptures and judge by them (S. 5:43-47, 5:66-68) - PARTIAL belief in these books is condemned, so it's WHOLESALE confirmation (S. 2:85) - It teaches that the standard of truth for Muhammad is the prior revelation (S. 10:94) - It teaches that NOBODY can change the words of Allah (S. 6:115) - The condemnation is that we twist these books VERBALLY, not textually (S. 3:78) So the Quran confirms the entirety of the text of our scriptures, then (unknowingly) contradicts them (example: Surah 9:30 VS John 10:36 on Christ being the Son of God) because Muhammad never read them and assumed he was in line with them because he believed he was a prophet.

Frank Turek@DrFrankTurek

What's the #1 thing Christians should understand about Islam?

English

107

223

1.4K

43K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·23h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ FALSE CLAIM The claims are completely fabricated. No mental disability: Real reports of this exact video make zero mention of the victim being mentally ill, disabled, or needing treatment. She's described as a poor woman from the Dalit community. No bread, no child, no child thief accusation: The incident has nothing to do with snatching food or kidnapping rumors. Those are classic fear mongering tropes added for outrage. What actually happened (verified by multiple Indian news outlets): This is from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh (Subhash Nagar area), around April 29–30, 2026 just days before the post. A grocery shop owner (named Mamta) allegedly repeatedly slapped and assaulted another woman over an unpaid ₹1,200 ($14) debt for groceries/ration supplies. The victim had bought items on credit and hadn't paid. The confrontation turned physical in public. An FIR (police complaint) has been registered against the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (India's criminal code); some reports mention possible SC/ST Act provisions due to the victim's Dalit background. Police are investigating. This is a debt dispute that escalated into assault ugly, illegal, and rightly sparking outrage online in India. Public beating over money is never justified, and Indian law treats it seriously (assault + potential caste-based atrocity angles). But turning it into "mentally ill woman steals bread cruel mob lynches her instead of helping" is 100% made-up propaganda.

پل دوپل کاجہانⓂ️@ahmedbright100

انڈیا میں ذہنی مزور عورت 🥹 عورت کا جرم اتنا بڑا تھا کہ اس نے ایک بچے سے روٹی چھین لی لوگوں نے اسے بچہ چور سمجھا اور پھر لوگوں نے انسانیت کے حقیقی رنگ دکھائے۔ جس کو علاج کی ضرورت تھی اس کے بجائے ظلم ہوا۔ کیا ہم نے کچھ کرنے سے پہلے سوچنا چھوڑ دیا ہے؟ ذہنی طور پر بیمار کون ہے - عورت یا یہ لوگ؟ Mental laborer woman in India 🥹 The woman's crime was so great that she snatched bread from a child People considered her a child thief and then People showed the true colors of humanity. The one who needed treatment was treated instead of being treated. Have we stopped thinking before doing anything? Who is mentally ill - the woman or these people?

English

0

53

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·23h

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ FALSE CLAIM The claims are completely fabricated. No mental disability: Real reports of this exact video make zero mention of the victim being mentally ill, disabled, or needing treatment. She's described as a poor woman from the Dalit community. No bread, no child, no child thief accusation: The incident has nothing to do with snatching food or kidnapping rumors. Those are classic fear mongering tropes added for outrage. What actually happened (verified by multiple Indian news outlets): This is from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh (Subhash Nagar area), around April 29–30, 2026 just days before the post. A grocery shop owner (named Mamta) allegedly repeatedly slapped and assaulted another woman over an unpaid ₹1,200 ($14) debt for groceries/ration supplies. The victim had bought items on credit and hadn't paid. The confrontation turned physical in public. An FIR (police complaint) has been registered against the accused under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (India's criminal code); some reports mention possible SC/ST Act provisions due to the victim's Dalit background. Police are investigating. This is a debt dispute that escalated into assault ugly, illegal, and rightly sparking outrage online in India. Public beating over money is never justified, and Indian law treats it seriously (assault + potential caste-based atrocity angles). But turning it into "mentally ill woman steals bread cruel mob lynches her instead of helping" is 100% made-up propaganda.

English

0

1

962

پل دوپل کاجہانⓂ️@ahmedbright100·1d

انڈیا میں ذہنی مزور عورت 🥹 عورت کا جرم اتنا بڑا تھا کہ اس نے ایک بچے سے روٹی چھین لی لوگوں نے اسے بچہ چور سمجھا اور پھر لوگوں نے انسانیت کے حقیقی رنگ دکھائے۔ جس کو علاج کی ضرورت تھی اس کے بجائے ظلم ہوا۔ کیا ہم نے کچھ کرنے سے پہلے سوچنا چھوڑ دیا ہے؟ ذہنی طور پر بیمار کون ہے - عورت یا یہ لوگ؟ Mental laborer woman in India 🥹 The woman's crime was so great that she snatched bread from a child People considered her a child thief and then People showed the true colors of humanity. The one who needed treatment was treated instead of being treated. Have we stopped thinking before doing anything? Who is mentally ill - the woman or these people?

اردو

6

46

288

63.4K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·1d

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ VIDEO CLAIM FALSE This footage is from a protest outside the Ministry of Justice in London by supporters of Palestine Action (a direct-action group focused on Palestine/Israel issues). The UK government designated Palestine Action as a terrorist organization (proscribed in 2025). Expressing support for it even peacefully with signs saying things like "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action" is treated as supporting a banned terrorist group under UK terrorism laws. Protesters (dozens of them) were arrested for this exact reason. The mannequin was simply a protest prop holding one of those signs. Police treated it the same way they treated human protesters with identical placards.

Faraz Pervaiz@FarazPervaiz3

🇬🇧 UK 30 police officers arrested a mannequin in the UK.🙄 Apparently because the mannequin was hurting the religious feelings of Muslims and Islam. 🫪

English

0

113

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·1d

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ VIDEO CLAIM FALSE This footage is from a protest outside the Ministry of Justice in London by supporters of Palestine Action (a direct-action group focused on Palestine/Israel issues). The UK government designated Palestine Action as a terrorist organization (proscribed in 2025). Expressing support for it even peacefully with signs saying things like "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action" is treated as supporting a banned terrorist group under UK terrorism laws. Protesters (dozens of them) were arrested for this exact reason. The mannequin was simply a protest prop holding one of those signs. Police treated it the same way they treated human protesters with identical placards.

English

1

0

305

Faraz Pervaiz@FarazPervaiz3·1d

🇬🇧 UK 30 police officers arrested a mannequin in the UK.🙄 Apparently because the mannequin was hurting the religious feelings of Muslims and Islam. 🫪

English

36

72

259

11.8K

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·1d

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ VERIFIED FAKE ❌️ This is not a judicial or mob execution it's entertainment. The style matches Indian street theater (nautanki-style plays), magic/fakir stunts, or festival miracle reenactments common at melas, fairs, or religious events in rural/small-town India. Similar clips have gone viral before as shocking illusions passed off as real. - Geographic/cultural markers: South Asian crowd (henna, bangles, attire), outdoor festival setup in India + possible "Har Har Mahadev" chants (a Shiva/Hindu devotional slogan). No Arabic, no Islamic symbols, no Middle Eastern/North African/Pakistani/Afghan setting. - No credible links to Sharia or Muslim countries: Real Sharia based public punishments (rare and state-controlled where they occur, e.g., in parts of Iran/Saudi/Afghanistan under Taliban) are formal, not chaotic phone-filmed festival mobs with jeans/sunglasses/modern casual wear. India (Hindu-majority) has zero official Sharia enforcement. The post uses the dramatic visuals + false caption to fuel creeping Sharia panic. This is recycled Indian street performance footage misrepresented for clicks and narrative. The clip likely originated as local entertainment on Indian social media before being decontextualized.

Isaac@isaacrrr7

¡Están literalmente ahorcando gente, sobre todo a mujeres! Esto es el islam tradicional practicando la Sharia. No son los extremistas. Van a gobernar la mayor parte de Occidente.

English

0

73

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·1d

✅️ MASTER_DEBUNKER ❌️ VERIFIED FAKE ❌️ This is not a judicial or mob execution it's entertainment. The style matches Indian street theater (nautanki-style plays), magic/fakir stunts, or festival miracle reenactments common at melas, fairs, or religious events in rural/small-town India. Similar clips have gone viral before as shocking illusions passed off as real. - Geographic/cultural markers: South Asian crowd (henna, bangles, attire), outdoor festival setup in India + possible "Har Har Mahadev" chants (a Shiva/Hindu devotional slogan). No Arabic, no Islamic symbols, no Middle Eastern/North African/Pakistani/Afghan setting. - No credible links to Sharia or Muslim countries: Real Sharia based public punishments (rare and state-controlled where they occur, e.g., in parts of Iran/Saudi/Afghanistan under Taliban) are formal, not chaotic phone-filmed festival mobs with jeans/sunglasses/modern casual wear. India (Hindu-majority) has zero official Sharia enforcement. The post uses the dramatic visuals + false caption to fuel creeping Sharia panic. This is recycled Indian street performance footage misrepresented for clicks and narrative. The clip likely originated as local entertainment on Indian social media before being decontextualized.

English

0

1

512

Isaac@isaacrrr7·1d

¡Están literalmente ahorcando gente, sobre todo a mujeres! Esto es el islam tradicional practicando la Sharia. No son los extremistas. Van a gobernar la mayor parte de Occidente.

Español

1K

3K

11.1K

1.5M

Master_Debunker@Master_Debunker·1d

✅️ EYES_WIDEOPEN DEBUNKED The video is real but from 2015 ISIS-controlled eastern Syria. It shows an ISIS militant announcing a Sharia punishment and a man being thrown from a building in front of a crowd that includes men and boys. However, the announcer explicitly states the execution is for an "evil act" of sexually assaulting/molesting a pre-pubescent child (child rape/molestation), not for homosexuality. What is being said: "Therefore, the Sharia court in Al-Jazirah State decided to implement one of the limits set by God Almighty on the one who committed this heinous act by assaulting a child who had not reached puberty, based on his own confession, so that he may be a lesson to others."

HJB News@HJB_News__

Muslim families bring their children to watch a gay man thrown off a rooftop to his death under Sharia Law.

English

0

91

Master_Debunker

Tuklasin