Redacted Note

@LeaveHeardAlone @BuzzFeed Coming from an Amber Heard supporter. You are not a serious person.

If you shit on Chappell Roan, you fell for another bot-fuelled smear campaign @BuzzFeed “BuzzFeed spoke with GUDEA, a research company that previously made headlines for its report that found that Taylor Swift was also subject to a coordinated online attack. They looked at of 100,030 posts generated by 54,334 unique users […] They found that 4.2% of users contributing to the Chappell conversation were "non-typical" — were very likely to be bots. They accounted for *over 23%* of the posts.” buzzfeed.com/natashajokic1/…

@PopCrave Nope, it's just a lot of people think she's a shit person, based off her previous behavior.

Research company GUDEA tells Buzzfeed over 23% of posts about Chappell Roan and her alleged security guard were “very likely” bot accounts. They looked at 100,030 posts generated by 54,334 unique users across seven platforms from March 20-22.

Grok just told us the quiet part out loud 👀

@fashionistaera It's because this 3itch is a industry plant. It's not organic, it's forced and we all sense it.

Why was Chappell Roan on the Hannah Montana special? 😳 It just didn’t make any sense. It felt so random. She’s shown how she can’t stand fans, but here she is clearly fangirling over Miley Cyrus. Oh, the irony! So it kind of looks like she loves celebs, just not regular ppl 😎

@ChappellRoan Yeah, this malcontent is complete waste. Just say no to industry plants, especially ones that are utter garbage.

@titMcGrit2 They don't need to remake it. We are living it.

Noooooooooooooooooooooo

@DailyMail It's obvious she despises fame and her fans. I think it's time for the public to give her what she wants... complete anonymity. Let's see this industry plant out the door. @ChappellRoan

Chappell Roan is outed as a hypocrite as her secretly rich family and privileged background is revealed amid backlash over hotel drama that left Jude Law's daughter in tears trib.al/SepAqlm

@dailyroan Fake BS, from the industry plant propaganda machine

chappell roan meeting a fan behind the scenes of the hannah montana 20th anniversary special!

@ChappellRoan and yet this is less cringe then your current antics. We're happy to see an industry plant malcontent like yourself see your way out the door.

Oh wow Chappell might come from more money than any other pop girl 🤯

CALIFORNIA FRAUD EXPOSED: Skid Row petitioner panics after our undercover journalist catches him exchanging cigarettes for signatures. For years, petitioners have been targeting the homeless on Skid Row, offering bribes such as cigarettes or cash in exchange for signing petitions that can change California law. They’ve also been registering the homeless to vote, oftentimes instructing them to use fraudulent information. Not only is this illegal per California election law, but @Savsays is the 4th journalist in the latest string of independent journalists catching this organized criminal activity on the streets of Skid Row. Back in 2018, the Los Angeles County District Attorney charged nine individuals with felony election crimes for running the exact same operation yet petitioners are still running the scheme every single day. This is part of an ongoing investigative series in collaboration with @ctznjusticelg and @JamesOKeefeIII, exposing just how easily the California voting system can be exploited and defrauded. @TPUSA

Biblical Prophecy with Jesus Christ warning of a false Messiah. Give this a read today. Important.

Iran wants to destroy California. Apparently they don't believe Gavin Newsom can do it alone.

@RubinReport Nobody wants your goy slop

Good morning, Internet. Quicker reminder, Tucker is a very evil man who lies about everything, hates Trump (and now Vance) and is working harder than anyone to get the Republicans defeated in the midterms.

She totally nailed it Satanic pedophiles run the world

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

This is so accurate it's scary.

@catturd2 Straight from the Israeli playbook. You are cooked and done.

This is the DM. I just sent that grifter Matt Wallace, who defamed me today and put out those ridiculous lies, that I was offered money to say bad things against Candace Owens, which he didn’t prove anything, zero receipts. I am sick and fucking tired of these grifters defaming me with their poisonous lies. I will spend every dime I have, which is a lot, to sue these liars out of existence from now on. I’m tired of it. Do you feel me?

@catturd2 Nice straw man. I don't think they said you were getting paid by TPUSA, but... You are getting paid to reiterate the same taking points that the other paid shills. Coincidence?

Oh so now I’m getting paid by TPUSA to say bad things about evil Candice Owens? 😂 imagine believing that BS. I’ve been calling that evil fraud out for years for free. But do you mean, you can actually get paid for it? I keep to myself and do everything Catturd related myself, but I’m going to have to consider getting a manager. I’ve been doing this all wrong. Somebody owes me years of back pay - 😂