Naka-pin na Tweet
@PitchforkPat
8.4K posts
@PitchforkPat
@PitchforkPat2
“Only one thing can stop this. Force, rooted in justice, and backed by moral courage." - Pat Buchanan
Boston, MA Sumali Eylül 2022
1K Sinusundan481 Mga Tagasunod
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
I am still here fighting from inside these walls. The appeals court ruled my sentencing violated my first amendment rights but I remain locked up. My only crime was protecting records so future generations could trust elections.
If we do not get rid of the machines we will lose our country.
Read the Mesa Reports at my website and see for yourself.
Thank you for all the prayers and support. All of you have been the reason I have been able to stay in this fight.
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
Republican voters make up 40% of New England. Democrats control the district lines.
Result:
🔴 — 0
🔵 — 27
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
In 2017, 20-year-old James Alex Fields attended the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.
As he tried to leave the event, a mob of violent Antifa degenerates swarmed his car on Fourth Street.
The street closed in around him. In fear for his life, instinct overtook hesitation. He accelerated and struck an obese rioter, killing her.
The ADL and SPLC vilified him relentlessly, pressing for the death penalty and going so far as to speciously link the incident to “terror attacks on Israel.”
His trial was a mockery, a political lynching; he was condemned to two life sentences without the possibility of parole, and an additional 419 years!
What was clearly self-defense was transformed into a Stalinist show trial.
James’s punishment was dictated by politics and symbolism rather than “justice.” It was intended as a warning to Whites, especially young White men, that any assertion of their group’s distinct collective interests will not be tolerated by the state.
That this young man remains in prison today is a national disgrace and a travesty of justice.
Pardon James Alex Fields.
English
I can’t believe that I think there is a chance Russini fathered Vrabel’s child. That is how nuts this has gotten. You just can’t name your kid the same name as the guy you are having an affair with. We have entered bananland with this story and nothing is off the table.
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
I am going to keep repeating this until people understand this.
Karen Bass was not only a Castro operative and Communist, but she got elevated to Vice Chair of National Endowment for Democracy, which is the center of soft power operations in the US government. She is not a "DEI mayor." She is extremely powerful at the global stage.
She was actively involved in shaping foreign policy with the Obama administration, especially Africa. Her Ghana visit during the LA wildfires wasn't a vacation, it was part of a Biden delegate to greet Ghana's new President.
She was considered HUD Secretary for the Biden administration. Instead, she nominated the person who would become the actual HHS Secretary - California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
Now, let me ask you. If a literal Castro operative gets elevated to this stage, what does this imply about the rest of the United States government?
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec
Reminder that Karen Bass is an actual communist who was trained in a Marxist Brigade by the Castro regime
English
@GuntherEagleman Because they have videos of him doing it with other gays.
English
Why is John Thune protecting election fraud?
I don't get it.
English
Shocked the @BostonGlobe didn’t cover this. 😂
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer
😅 Headline and cover of the day. Made me chuckle.
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE
✞🎀TrumpGirlOnFire 🔥@TrumpGirlOnFire
REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE REMOVE THUNE
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
There's no better snapshot of "racism" in 21st century America than SPLC- the biggest anti-racism hustle out there- paying to manufacture racism so SPLC can raise money from sanctimonious old libs to fight this imaginary racism
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
If you’re wondering how our elections in America are always so close, like how Democrats pulled ahead in Virginia’s redistricting within a few percentage points, this is how
Former CIA Operations Officer Gary Berntsen explains there are teams of people who rig our elections and keep the vote totals extremely close, by slim margins, so it’s believable and hard to prove fraud
Lara Logan interviews Former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen. He explains, in detail, how elections are being stolen in America
He describes there are teams of statisticians, mathematicians, and hackers who map out every county and identify where margins can be quietly adjusted
Different techniques are used in each location so nothing matches in a recount. When a 70-30 county becomes 68-32, nobody notices. But when you add up these differences across an entire state, those tiny amounts of fraud decide outcomes
Both former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen and author Ralph Pezzullo explain the strategy. They explain they don't flip the big blue cities. Instead they shave votes in the places no one ever audits
“They know where they can find the dead people... Mm-hmm.”
“They plan this, It's meticulous. It's meticulous. These guys are experts at this. It's not just a few guys in a back room. You're talking about hundreds of statisticians and engineers, and they work it, you know, for a year to plan and mathematicians and hackers.”
“We had a map out of Colorado when we were talking to our engineers, the guys that designed it, that stole the elections.
— We just go to every one place where Trump wins 70-30 and — Shaved it off.
We shave in every other place. We don't go near a Democratic place, because when they wanna do recounts, they're gonna go to the Democratic places. They don't realize we shaved in every other committee. We know every other county.
We know how to do this. And then in each of those things where they shave, they shave with a different technique in each one of those. So if you found something in, in one county, there's no continuity around the state that way.
So this is why the Republicans are so much at fault, because they have the power and the ability to show in their areas they can allow access to the machines, they can allow access to the source code”
People need to go to prison. Democrats are stealing elections nationwide in every county, in every state of America
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
Why does Barry Soetoro have a social security number which belonged to a dead Connecticut guy who died in Hawaii?
English
Boo’s raining onto the ice in Buffalo, guess those 27$ beer sabers aren’t tasting too good! #BRUINS
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
Did you know John McCain personally delivered the Steele dossier to the FBI?
Did you know John McCain was the deciding vote that saved Obamacare?
Did you know Barack Obama named a U.S. Navy destroyer after John McCain?
And did you know John McCain barred Donald Trump from his funeral and asked Barack Obama to deliver his eulogy?
Now you know.
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
🚨 Exposing California's corrupt "Stop Nick Shirley Act", instead of going after the fraudsters California is now going after the people exposing the fraud.
This bill AB 2624 will:
- Criminalize journalists with misdemeanors, $10,000 fines, imprisonment, and content takedown
- Let immigrant based NGOs' funding be confidential
- Take away freedom of the press from journalists
- Protect any "immigration support services" information from being public (healthcare, legal services, etc)
This bill was created by the Attorney General's WIFE Mia Bonta to stop fraud from being exposed. Please like and share this video everywhere! By trying to silence and intimidate journalists, they are trying to hide the truth from you. EXPOSE ALL THE FRAUD.
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
🚨 WOW! Nick Shirley went confronted California’s House Speaker to her FACE over the Stop Nick Shirley Act
And of course, she RAN AWAY!
@nickshirleyy: “These people won’t even answer the questions!”
The corruption is INSANE.
English
@PitchforkPat nag-retweet
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
English