Ron

book will get 40 and we might still lose

book wont miss a middy, he needs to take 15 middys

Dillion passed, yessssss

Its that time

@DamoSC @magicmoments000 100%, Damo the port supporter.

@magicmoments000 It will either be Dante Visentini back in to help combat the Reeves/Meek combo, or BZT in and ToMar forward.

the news gets worst for our fwd line now marshall probably plays fwd 😡 i cant Calm a down

@bradeningram of course, absolute BS

AFL is zeroing in on the discrepancy between Zak Butters’ on ground interview and what he is saying in today’s hearing. 'How is that a free kick?' v 'Surely that's not a free kick?’ League council says there’s real doubt on the basis of Butters/Wines evidence while umpire Nick Foot has been consistent throughout and therefore is arguing on the balance of probabilities the umpire’s version should be preferred. @FootyonNine

@AndrewLeezus Hey leezus, give me a follow and go the Suns☀️

if you're awake and a Suns fan and I don't follow u lmk I'll follow u rn

@Chrisvano1997 @DavidZita1 @FOXFOOTY Who is regarded around the league as one of the most honest blokes, he wouldn’t testify if butters said “how much are they paying you

@Ronbishop97 @DavidZita1 @FOXFOOTY Yeah a team mate 😂

Zak Butters is fronting the AFL Tribunal. Follow via @FOXFOOTY and this thread.

@DavidZita1 @FOXFOOTY No evidence whatsoever from Foot Butters has a witness which is real evidence

@FOXFOOTY Nicholas Foot's evidence has concluded.

@DamoSC Surely the afl has better things to do

... so what are we doing here

@Addyant23 Elani nicholls and foot will umpire port vs hawks

One thing's for sure, Nick Foot cannot umpire another Port game regardless of the outcome of this imo.

@joshmoney__ At worst fine? No suspension?

Raw umpire audio here👇🏻 basically unusable as evidence. Very strongly-worded Power statement too. Tribunal will hopefully sit mid-afternoon tomorrow. Hard to see it being a short one…

@FOXFOOTY @RalphyHeraldSun Fines regarding football acts and words to an umpire should not be correlated nor considered in this trial, no doubt it will due to the port tax.

"Those two versions of the event are so diametrically opposed." 🤔 @RalphyHeraldSun with the latest on Zak Butters' controversial tribunal case with umpire Nick Foot... and the 'elephant in the room' 👇 #AFLTonight.

@FOXFOOTY @RalphyHeraldSun Ralph batting opposed to port what is new

@BraydenTalks Even all the crows fans are on our side lol

I don’t think I’ve ever had in my life seen so many opposition supporters come out in support of 1. A opposition player like Buttsy who’s been wrong accused and 2. Of Port for getting crucified by the umpires. So many accounts I normally see bagging us horrifically in support.

@kanecornes No chance

Does Foot give Butters Brownlow votes?

@joshmoney__ I don’t know if your thinking what I’m thinking Josh, but this seems like the umpire Nick Foot didn’t like the way the player said something as appose to what was actually said?

As it stands Port Adelaide is expecting Zak Butters to head to the tribunal to contest alleged umpire abuse. Understand the club believes there’s a possible breakdown in communication. The use of the word pay or paid in relation to a free kick, could mistakenly be heard to be questioning umpire Foot’s integrity. Butters adamant no inappropriate language was used @7NewsAdelaide @7AFL

Chat do portland have a defender book would struggle with?

@magicmoments000 Afl clubs should not allowed to report injuries like this. 3-6 vs 1 week, come on.

3-6 weeks has become 1 week Richmond need to hire the Dogs medical staff strait away and pay them whatever they want 😂

Book is not injured right? just being rested?