alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared
5.5K posts

alwaysared nag-retweet

BREAKING NEWS
“Furious” Starmer was not told local elections had taken place yesterday.
The PM claims civil servants kept him in the dark until this morning.
He has ordered an enquiry into why the elections had gone ahead without his knowledge.
“I thought we’d cancelled them” he told Sky News.

English
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet

Tomorrow marks 1,337 days, exactly 43 Months since Nick Brown was suspended from the Labour Party and the Public still haven't been told why
Labour Cover-ups have been happening for a while, remember that at the voting booth tomorrow #VoteConservative
English
alwaysared nag-retweet

Another powerful story the mainstream media buried: In 1995, NYC’s Veterans Day Parade was on the brink of cancellation, broke, with zero corporate donations after asking 200 companies.
The then-businessman Donald Trump stepped up: he wrote a personal check for $200,000, helped raise another $300,000, and marched with over 25,000 veterans down Fifth Avenue.
Parade director Tom Fox (a Vietnam vet) said it plainly: “Donald Trump saved the parade.”
This wasn’t for votes or headlines; it was pure respect for our warriors and love for America. Long before politics, Trump showed where his heart is.
The MSM won’t tell you this side of him. Share if you stand with Trump and our veterans.
English
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet

🚨BREAKING!!! 46 IPCC Scientists REBEL: The Climate Narrative is Crumbling from Within!🚨
Forty-six scientists tied to the IPCC have stepped away or spoken out because their evidence-based views clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom story pushed in the Summaries for Policymakers. Don’t trust me, read their own words here! ⬇️
Dr. Robert Balling: “The IPCC notes that ‘No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.’ This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr. John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr. Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr. Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr. Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr. Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr. John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Yet the grift rolls on. New grads, indoctrinated in universities, keep repackaging the same scares for the next generation. “Consensus!” “The Science says!” Endless control through manufactured ignorance.
Meanwhile, nature doesn’t care about the narrative. Natural forcings rule. The Sun is cooling. Jet stream gone meridional. Cosmic rays surging, seeding clouds. Result? Wild swings, then global cooling.
The emperor has no clothes, and the scientists who know it are finally speaking up. 🔥
Original work from The Dragons Breathe Substack:
open.substack.com/pub/thedragons…

English
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet

🚨 NEW: While every talking head screams "Iraq 2.0," @barbaramboyd explains what they'll NEVER tell you — 118 years of British financial control over Iran, and why Trump just struck the last piece on the Empire's chessboard.
SHARE AND FOLLOW @MrWhiplash_
English
alwaysared nag-retweet

News🇬🇧🚨: "The prosecution involving the 3 Ukrainian rent boys, appearing at the Old Bailey today maintain that they have never met Keir Starmer and were paid to firebomb his front door and back doors by a Russia sounding chap they've never met called El Money". @georgegalloway.
You couldn't make this shit up, but someone has.
Not a SINGLE MSM outlet is reporting on this due to a closed court reporting measure from this pathetic series of wet wipes.
Veteran broadcaster and Leader of the @WorkersPartyGB George Galloway gives a fascinating update in a curious case that seems to be the workings of a poorly written Hollywood script.
English
alwaysared nag-retweet
alwaysared nag-retweet

A LABOUR COUNCILLOR WORKING AS A SENIOR AIDE FOR HEALTH SECRETARY WES STREETING AVOIDS JAIL AFTER EXPOSING HIMSELF TO 13 YEAR OLD GIRL.
A SENIOR aide to Wes Streeting and Labour councillor has AVOIDED jail after pleading guilty to two counts of indecent exposure.
Sam Gould, 33, also a Labour councillor for Redbridge Council intentionally exposed his genitals "intending that someone would see them and be caused alarm or distress".
he exposed himself to a 13-year-old girl who banged on doors asking for help after he followed her into a cul-de-sac.
The teenager’s mother said she was scared to leave the house after the incident.
At Barkingside Magistrates’ Court this afternoon, Gould was sentenced to 22 weeks imprisonment suspended for two years.

English















