Tinus

4 posts

Tinus

Tinus

@Tienuseth

Sumali Şubat 2009
534 Sinusundan37 Mga Tagasunod
Tinus
Tinus@Tienuseth·
@kris September 2020. Cannot be trusted afterwards.
English
0
0
0
13
Tinus
Tinus@Tienuseth·
@kris You rolled back trades on your exchange a few ago when your internal desk screwed up and held funds hostage afterwards. Maybe the regulators can take a look at that?
English
1
0
0
23
Kris
Kris@kris·
Regulators should look into the exchanges that had most liquidations in the last 24h and conduct a thorough review of fairness of practices. Any of them slowing down to a halt, effectively not allowing people to trade? Were all trades priced correctly and in line with indexes? What’s the setup for trade monitoring and AML programs? Are their internal trading teams fully Chinese-walled? $20B in liquidations, a lot of users got hurt. The job of regulatory bodies is to protect the consumers and assure market integrity.
Kris tweet media
English
976
1.5K
6.6K
1.4M
Tinus
Tinus@Tienuseth·
@StackingEUR @NMTD8 @IntentX_ “We don’t count maker volume”. You work at an exchange and you don’t know how volume works?
English
0
0
1
43
StackingEUR
StackingEUR@StackingEUR·
Gm ser! Let’s start off with saying that Hyperliquid & IntentX are definitely at different places, and also completely different in terms of infrastructure. Hyperliquid has more volume & more OI. Only thing we’re looked at here is liquidity depth. Our OI is extremely scalable. It’s not like passive LP, as more is in demand more will be provided. Regarding volume: IntentX doesn’t count maker volume & it’s not an orderbook model so there is no “volume” that occurs from MM. We have 275+ pairs, these all come from Binance which our solvers are connected to. Just because there’s no volume on a lot of them, doesn’t mean they’re not available. Either way, of course I cherry pick data, that’s what we all do😄 Would love to chat more about IntentX.
English
1
0
0
311
StackingEUR
StackingEUR@StackingEUR·
IntentX vs Hyperliquid Liquidity Depth📊 Perp dexes are full of competition, but what are some of the most important things to compare? Trade pairs are obviously one of them, where @IntentX_ shines through with 275+ pairs. However, Liquidity Depth is also extremely important. And this is where #IntentX really shines: ▶️Let's compare $BTC depth on @IntentX_ vs @HyperliquidX We'll take the +0.2% depth for this example. On IntentX, the 0.2% depth on $BTC = 433.6 $BTC On Hyperliquid, the 0.2% depth on $BTC = 45 $BTC That's an insane 10x difference. All thanks to the intent-based architecture🔥 Want deep liquidity? Trade on IntentX📊 ▶️Start Trading: app.intentx.io/?referral=Stac…
StackingEUR tweet mediaStackingEUR tweet media
English
29
30
82
19.7K