Budding Trader

2.2K posts

Budding Trader banner
Budding Trader

Budding Trader

@TraderBudding

$NQ $ES trader. Learner. Degenerate. Here to connect with traders. Set your life on fire, seek those who fan your flames -Rumi

Glossop, England Sumali Temmuz 2019
155 Sinusundan254 Mga Tagasunod
Budding Trader nag-retweet
kuno
kuno@kunoo·
This is who you're trading against.
English
203
139
1.6K
221.2K
Budding Trader nag-retweet
apterostrading
apterostrading@apterostrading·
The "toxic mindset" of retail trading is expecting a win every day regardless of conditions. Real professional trading is about developing a contextual view and a disciplined execution model. Merritt Black explains how to build both in this strategy deep dive. Watch the full strategy breakdown: youtube.com/watch?v=7_LjS1…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
4
34
2K
Budding Trader nag-retweet
Ramblings
Ramblings@ramblingsloa·
Two roads diverged in a wood and I I took the one less traveled by And that has made all the difference. Robert Frost
Ramblings tweet media
English
53
884
3.8K
39.4K
Trevor
Trevor@illbethe_moon·
@CryptoChartsJoe “Exact bottoms” lol calling bottoms on a 2m tf is wild work bro hope it helps you sell your course though
Trevor tweet media
English
1
0
1
32
Budding Trader
Budding Trader@TraderBudding·
@gothburz @illbethe_moon see what he is saying bro! However I think they have links with Epstein so not really a cool company to invest however you've made your millions from this, congratulations hold it is going higher n higher!!
English
0
0
0
22
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage. I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale. Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal: "If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded." I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point. Let me explain what I meant by nationalization. I meant it. I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion. The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies. I am talking about the other companies. Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract. The company that got the contract was OpenAI. OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway. Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product. I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can. The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same. The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books. Here is the thing I want you to understand. I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product. The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur. The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat. I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up. The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes. What I described is already happening.
English
2K
4.3K
20.7K
5.4M
Steven Spencer
Steven Spencer@sspencer_smb·
software has bottomed $IGV crypto has bottomed $IBIT
Steven Spencer tweet mediaSteven Spencer tweet media
English
4
0
40
2.7K
Budding Trader nag-retweet
American Warrior for Christ
American Warrior for Christ@johnrackham82·
Before you start belly aching over this "cleric", read this: Ali Khamenei had properties in Venezuela, Syria, Dubai, the United Kingdom, and other countries, including Spain, where he owned hotels in Madrid, Marbella, and Palma de Mallorca. All assets were regularly used by his children. His fortune is estimated at $200 BILLION! Islam, like communism, is a total SCAM.
American Warrior for Christ tweet media
English
2.6K
17K
45.8K
1.5M
Budding Trader nag-retweet
David Keyes
David Keyes@DavidMKeyes·
🚨BREAKING: According to several sources, Khamenei's last words were, "So that's what Palantir fucking does!"
English
213
1.2K
19.3K
1.8M
Earner
Earner@Earnerfun·
I'm Hiring!!!! Looking for Web3 Enthusiasts to join my team on a new project Salary: $130 - $250 Weekly Interested? leave a comment below on which aspect you're good at I'll dm you personally No experience required Remote 4- 12 hours daily required Like, rt & turn on
Earner tweet media
English
1.1K
215
919
127K
Budding Trader nag-retweet
Jesse Livermore
Jesse Livermore@Jesse_Livermore·
Fantastic episode. Super clear thinking on all of the issues that the market is wrestling with. Absolute must listen.
Patrick OShaughnessy@patrick_oshag

My conversation with Dan Sundheim (@dsundheim). He is the founder and CIO of D1 Capital Partners, which manages over $30B across public and private markets. There's no one as passionate about investing as Dan. We had a really wide-ranging conversation and discuss: - Public vs. private markets in 2026 - Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX - How Dario reminds him of Jeff Bezos - The future of hyperscalers - The software selloff and what comes next - GameStop and the LP dinner that followed - China vs. US: the risk of Taiwan Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 1:05 Public vs. Private Markets 9:10 LLMs as a Business Model 23:23 The Future of Hyperscalers 27:45 AI's Impact on Traditional Software 36:31 Surviving the GameStop Short Squeeze 49:54 Big Private Bets: Rivian and SpaceX 54:26 The Art of Short Selling 1:04:28 Early Career 1:17:11 Geopolitics and the Semiconductor Collision Course 1:22:05 Traits of Great Leadership 1:23:20 The Kindest Thing

English
0
16
149
43.5K
Budding Trader nag-retweet
Kris Sidial🇺🇸
Kris Sidial🇺🇸@Ksidiii·
The fact that these types of arguments even exist is funny. Here’s a real-life example for you. The co-founder and co-CIO of Ambrus is @WillAmbrus. Before starting the business six years ago with me, he was strictly an independent trader. Made millions personally for years out of college. No job at a prop firm, no job at a bank, no side hustles, no job ever outside of being a trader. An independent trader for almost a decade. He then went on to start a hedge fund, raised half a billion, backed by some prominent investors including a large multi-strat, and has consistently been one of the top performers in the space. This isn’t a “I know a guy” story, this is a real example of someone who made money as an independent trader for years and then scaled it to a much larger capacity. It’s a small group that will succeed trading independently, but this applies to every single lucrative thing in this life. If you want it, put in the work and go for it!
Ryan Scott (Horse)@TheFlowHorse

x.com/i/article/2024…

English
31
110
1.5K
153.2K
Budding Trader nag-retweet
Tom Dante
Tom Dante@Trader_Dante·
First word you see is your trading style
Tom Dante tweet media
English
124
11
390
37.9K