Fight for our Freedom

27K posts

Fight for our Freedom banner
Fight for our Freedom

Fight for our Freedom

@back2normal21

Tolerance isn't a virtue if you're tolerating evil. Leo Kearse.

England Sumali Mayıs 2011
7.1K Sinusundan4.5K Mga Tagasunod
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Restore Britain
Restore Britain@RestoreBritain_·
@ZiaYusufUK Failed Tories are ‘trying’ to infiltrate Reform? You’re in the same party as Nadine Dorries and Nadhim Zahawi. Pipe down pal.
English
52
407
10.3K
73K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Lydia † 🇬🇧
Lydia † 🇬🇧@LibertyLydia·
Casually sitting on the DLR reading @RupertLowe10’s letter to the British nation. Getting a lot of stares. Accidentally left it on the seat as I was getting off just now. Perhaps others might now read it too. Been pretty clumsy with these leaflets while travelling through London today. 🙂
Lydia † 🇬🇧 tweet mediaLydia † 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
62
183
843
5.1K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
I read in the Telegraph that Morrisons have sacked a manager for tackling a shoplifter. Honestly, if a shoplifter gets a bit roughed up and takes a kick whilst being stopped by a decent law-abiding citizen? Oh well. I couldn't care less. Morrisons should be ashamed.
English
410
3.3K
33.1K
275.7K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
addy nuff x
addy nuff x@GLNatashaxo·
So let’s get this straight… brand new party, barely warmed up — and already 130,000 members? Rupert Lowe didn’t just dip a toe in, did he… straight in the deep end and people are clearly jumping in with him. If this is the “just getting started” phase, the rest should be interesting 👀 Aim high, Vote Lowe.❤️🇬🇧❤️🇬🇧 @Restorebritain_
addy nuff x tweet media
English
53
334
1.2K
9.1K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Lionheart Brits
Lionheart Brits@MarySpeaksUp·
@BasilTheGreat He sees X as dangerous because we see through him and we despise him for what he did to Rupert. Farage could have had it all but his ego got in the way. Sad. Moving on...🇬🇧
English
2
8
105
1.5K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Cllr Scott Cameron
Cllr Scott Cameron@CllrScottC·
The UK does not need Reforming, it needs Restoring.
English
104
511
8.6K
75.9K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Brit-Report
Brit-Report@Brit_Report·
@AvonandsomerRob Farage isn't genuinely behind what he's saying, he's been dragged to that position. Voting for Reform Yookay to sort out immigration is like voting for a remainer to implement Brexit!!
English
1
2
3
230
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Britain is ready for real change. And I mean real change. Not merely conserving, or reforming. Restoring.
English
470
2.8K
25.5K
178.4K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Big spike in Restore Britain membership this weekend.
English
355
1.9K
27.4K
191.3K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Kieran Mishchuk
Kieran Mishchuk@CllrKieran·
As chairman of Restore Britain Swale & Mid Kent Branch, I am very pleased to announce that, Ryan Kidby, the former chairman of the leader of Kent County Council's Reform Branch has joined @RestoreBritain_! Ryan is a British Army veteran, who saw action in Iraq and Afghanistan, he is also a local businessman, a family man, and a proud patriot of this nation! Like many a few years ago, he joined Reform because he saw where the country was heading and wanted to do something about it. He saw first hand the kinds of people that have been allowed to enter this country, and wanted to put a stop to it. I know Ryan very well, he is the first person I speak to when I want to discuss a plan or a topic, and I'm glad he's back on my team. He fought for the grassroots within Reform and was overlooked. Like me, he saw the rot that was being allowed into that party and couldn't put up with it any longer. He is not a man who will ever compromise on his principles, that's why he's joined Restore Britain. Ryan is doing the right thing, and standing for what he truly believes in! Welcome, Ryan!
Kieran Mishchuk tweet media
English
125
741
4.7K
71.3K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Dr Henry Ealy
Dr Henry Ealy@DrHenryEaly·
I was wrong yesterday... I said 'vaccines are a scam.' Please forgive me.🙏 What I should have said is that 'vaccines are a CRIME!' Yes... That's much more accurate.🙂
English
195
1.3K
6.9K
46.6K
Fight for our Freedom nag-retweet
Maxi
Maxi@AllForProgress_·
On Saturday morning, a woman in her twenties was raped outside Epsom Methodist Church on Ashley Road. She had left a nightclub; she was followed by a group of men; the attack took place between two and four in the morning, in the heart of a market town in Surrey that most of the country thinks of, if it thinks of it at all, as somewhere you go to see the horses run. The residents of Epsom have asked Surrey Police reasonable questions. "Who are the suspects? What do they look like? Is there CCTV?" Surrey Police has declined to answer. They have said they do not have "sufficient information" to release descriptions. They have urged the public "not to speculate," because speculation "may lead to additional tensions within local communities." Translated from the institutional dialect, this means: we know what you are likely to conclude from the descriptions, and we would rather you didn't. On Tuesday evening, hundreds of residents gathered in the town centre to ask the question again. The police response was to deploy public order units, riot shields, and helmets against people standing on the pavement of their own high street demanding to know what the men who raped a woman six doors down from them actually look like. The local Lib Dem MP - who represents these people and the town - told the protesters to "take it elsewhere." "Take it elsewhere." This is the settled posture of the modern British state toward its own citizens. When a town asks for the most basic information about a violent sexual offence committed on its streets - information that, thirty years ago, would have been on the front of every regional paper within hours - it is met first with bureaucratic evasion, then with riot police, then with a sitting member of parliament telling them to do one. Epsom is not an unruly place. It is not a place with a history of disorder. It is a comfortable commuter town in Surrey whose residents have been told, in the space of seventy-two hours, that the police will not tell them who is hunting women on their streets, that asking about it constitutes a threat to community cohesion, and that if they persist in asking they will be treated as a public order problem. There is a specific and ugly contempt encoded in this response. It is the contempt of an administrative class that has decided the British public cannot be trusted with the truth about anything happening to it, and that the job of the state is no longer to solve the crime but to manage the reaction to it, forcibly. The people of Epsom have not misbehaved. They have done the thing that citizens of a serious country are supposed to do when something terrible happens where they live: they have turned up and asked questions. And the answer they have received, delivered in riot gear, is that their questions are the problem.
English
220
1.8K
7.1K
194.8K