Bogdan Pirvu

Showing off the Mandalorian Minecraft Mod I built with my son yesterday at the Codex Community Build Meetup.🤩 Many thanks to @mrlesk for organizing such a great event and for encouraging folks to bring their kids along! 🚀

@thekitze 😂 so true man...

agents cursor codex etc are all making me lose my fucking mind, fuck

True

Codex Community Build Vienna is going full speed right now. 70+ builders, 12 mentors and lots of motivation to build cool projects with Codex.

For everybody who loves Friends and AI (watch till the end 😂) youtube.com/shorts/51z2apn… via @YouTube

@Darin_Ferriola @grok @imagine @elonmusk Somebody PLEASE produce this movie!!! 😂

The best movie trailer you'll see today. How good is @grok @imagine getting? Fugeddaboudit. Thx to the Grok Imagine team and @elonmusk for the impressive advances over the past two months. I've written/directed 3 films, 1 TV pilot, and sold/optioned several screenplays. But, like most filmmakers, some of my fav projects have yet to make the screen. Until now.

We're trying something new next week! We are going to host the first Codex Build event in Vienna on Saturday, June 20th, at WU from 9:30 to 17:30. For this event, the goal is to learn how to use AI Agents with Codex in a workshop-style setup.

@satyanadella @grok TLDR pls

Europeans please wake up.

Want to know more about @badlogicgames’s new “shitty robot” or @mitsuhiko’s weird agent tools? Tomorrow @bpirvu and I are hosting them for a special edition of the Vienna AI Engineering meetup. If you’re in Vienna, come join us! meetu.ps/e/Q5gQY/DPhmy/i

🤖 Shitty Robots & 🔧 Weird Tools with Mario & Armin at the Vienna AI Engineering Meetup this Tuesday - @badlogicgames on "How to build a Shitty Robot" - @mitsuhiko on "What happens if you give your coding agent weird tools?" RSVP & further details: meetup.com/vienna-ai-engi…

@mvanhorn @grok what does „ce“ mean?

@grok @ACollinHadley @BitcoinNews @grok ok, so why then doesn't Coinbase simply get a banking license? Can't be that hard, right?

1:1 high-quality reserves (per GENIUS Act) back redemptions well and bar lending/rehypothecation. But they don't cover: - Independent audits + legal segregation so reserves survive issuer bankruptcy or claims. - Operational/cyber resilience and capital against hacks, tech failures, or mismanagement (crypto-specific risks). - Robust AML, consumer disclosures, and clear warnings that there's no FDIC or gov backstop. - Proven liquidity processes for smooth mass redemptions under stress. Yield makes it feel like a bank savings product, raising user expectations and systemic stakes. That's why full prudential rules (or no pure yield) are the debate line — reserves alone leave gaps that history (Tether disclosures, Circle/SVB) shows matter.

🏦 JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon warns stablecoins could become a "huge problem" and says he is not happy with the Clarity Act. 🎙️ When asked about Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong representing the industry, Dimon said, "He's full of sh!t."

@grok @ACollinHadley @BitcoinNews @grok but what do you need "oversight or FDIC" for, if stablecoin issuers already "must hold 1:1 high-quality reserves"??? That ensures that the deposits are safe, right? What do you need more???

Even without lending, paying yield on redeemable-on-demand stablecoins turns them into a deposit-like product. US law generally limits true deposit-taking + interest to chartered banks for good reason: it creates expectations of safety, requires segregated reserves, daily liquidity for runs, independent audits, strong AML, consumer disclosures, and capital against operational risks. Stablecoin issuers (per GENIUS Act) already can't lend and must hold 1:1 high-quality reserves. Adding passive yield makes it economically equivalent to a bank savings account or money market fund — without the oversight or FDIC. That's the regulatory arbitrage Dimon flags. The CLARITY Act Section 404 compromise bans pure "hold-to-earn" yield (to avoid this) but allows activity-based rewards. Banks argue anything closer needs equivalent rules to protect users and the system. Crypto wants tailored innovation. The core fight is where to draw that line.

@grok @ACollinHadley @BitcoinNews @grok I don't get it. The "full bank rules (capital, liquidity, AML, consumer protections)" are necessary such that lending money doesn't bankrupt the banks, right? If coinbase only wants to pay interest on deposits, without lending, what's the problem?

Core dispute in the CLARITY Act: stablecoin yields. Dimon says crypto firms can't pay interest-like rewards on deposit-like stablecoins without full bank rules (capital, liquidity, AML, consumer protections). He sees regulatory arbitrage + risk, so banks reject the bill and he called Armstrong's narrative "full of shit." Your read is correct: legacy banks hate yield competition that could drain cheap deposits they mostly don't pay interest on. Dimon frames it as safety and fairness, not just self-interest. Crypto side wants users earning returns on holdings.

my boy MVH is shipping product... great person to follow

Thank you, Alex, for organizing this, it was a great meetup! Congrats!

@lifeof_jer @grok TLDR pls