justmeRenee2026

This cry-baby "got bit" by the hockey bug in 2022 & is complaining about how "toxic" it is. Of course, kid, you'd turn off comments. You don't understand that we've been playing *generationally* and watching HS tournies for DECADES. Hockey is built on family & patriotism. GFY

I'm not pro-war, I am pro-get it done and get the fuck out of there.

Sickening

Two illegal aliens producing a baby should never produce an American citizen - it should produce 3 deported illegal aliens. Period.

This is some NEXT LEVEL corruption and we're about to BLOW YOUR MIND. This needs to be reposted EVERYWHERE! For DECADES, a Democrat federal judge reportedly made it illegal for Republicans to be poll watchers. It happened from the 80's and didn't end until 2020!! “Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections. And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction. So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.” REPOST for exposure! #thinblueline #lawenforcement

Two birthright citizens, born to illegal immigrant parents from China, tried to bomb an Air Force base on American soil. Whoever they were “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” it wasn’t the United States of America.

Praying for our pilot as the U.S. confirms one of its fighter jets was shot down over Iran and a search is underway for the pilot. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

🚨HOLY CRAP!!! The Charlotte NC judge who gave a $20k bond to a man who was CAUGHT ON CAMERA revving his car, smashing into, and k*lling an 8-year-old little girl who was riding her bike... ...IS A DEMOCRAT JUDGE WITH PRIOR CHARGES HIMSELF FOR FALSIFYING LEGAL DOCUMENTS!!!! He served only 90 days of unsupervised probation and kept his job as a judge. This. Is. Insanity.

🚨 BREAKING: It was just revealed that the Chinese suspects who tried detonating an IED at a US Air Force Base were BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENS of ILLEGAL ALIENS Omg. This is EXACTLY what Justice Sam Alito tried telling everyone at the Supreme Court! STRIKE DOWN BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP for illegals. Per Daily Wire: The two's parents were arrested on March 18 for illegal entry, they tried getting asylum in 1993, but ultimately got a deportation order in 1998. It was the CHILDREN of Qiu Qin Zou and Jia Zhang Zheng who tried bombing MacDill Air Force Base Visitor’s Center in Tampa FL. Justice Alito LITERALLY warned that the children of foreigners would have allegiance to our enemies. He was right. At least FIVE JUSTICES need to see the writing on the wall and do the right thing! H/t @MaryMargOlohan @realDailyWire

Supreme Court Must Stop the Birth Tourism Epidemic amac.us/newsline/polit…

X is censoring this video so hard its not even funny. This platform still discriminates against Christians and Conservatives and you'll never convince me otherwise.

How can this not be a (9-0) decision by the Supreme Court If they don't honor the 14th amendment as it's written, not as they want it to be... we're finished as a country This should be a (9-0) decision... and everyone knows it Anything bad for America, is good for Democrats

It’s true… pass it on 👉

WHO EXACTLY IS AFRAID OF KNOWING WHO VOTED? On March 31, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections." I read the whole thing. Every word. And I have to be honest with you — I expected to find something controversial. Something overreaching. Something that would justify the meltdown I was already watching unfold in real time. I didn't find it. What I found was... pretty reasonable, actually. Almost boring, if you're being clinical about it. — WHAT THE ORDER ACTUALLY DOES — The Department of Homeland Security, working with the Social Security Administration and the SAVE program (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, established under 42 U.S.C. 1320b-7 — look it up, it's been there a while), will compile a list of verified U.S. citizens in each state and transmit it to state election officials no fewer than 60 days before any federal election. States can supplement, correct, or dispute entries. Individuals can update or correct their own records. The U.S. Postal Service, under direction from the Postmaster General, will initiate a proposed rulemaking within 60 days. The core requirement: mail-in ballots must go in envelopes with unique Intelligent Mail barcodes, marked as Official Election Mail, with verified chain of custody. One envelope per vote. Ballots only go to people confirmed to be on the state's eligible voter list. That's it. That is the thing causing the "total meltdown." You need ID to buy cough medicine with pseudoephedrine in it. You need ID to board an airplane. You need ID to open a bank account, rent a car, attend a Democratic National Convention event, or even get into certain congressional town halls — yes, INCLUDING town halls hosted by the very senators now screaming about voter suppression. What is the next big radical idea? Requiring ID to pick up a prescription? ...wait, you already have to do that. What about requiring ID to prove you're a citizen before the government mails you a federal ballot? Apparently THAT is the one bridge too far. Quinn's Law #23 applies here in textbook fashion: liberals love the law unless they don't agree with it. Then they just don't obey it. — THE REACTION TELLS YOU EVERYTHING — Within hours of the signing, Democrat attorneys general were already organizing a "unified lawsuit" across multiple states. Chuck Schumer announced, with his trademark understated humility, "See you in court, you will lose." Oregon's AG declared it unconstitutional. Maine's election officials said the postal service "does not get to decide which ballots they deliver." Twenty-plus states signaled they'd fight it. Now. Let me ask you something I genuinely want you to think about. If mail-in voting is already completely secure — as Democrats have insisted, loudly and repeatedly, since 2020 — what EXACTLY is the problem with adding a barcode and confirming citizenship? If the system is airtight, this order changes nothing. It just documents what was already happening. Right? Unless it wasn't already happening. Which would explain a lot, actually. Quinn's Law #2: if you want to know what liberals are up to, pay attention to what they accuse conservatives of doing. For years I was told I was paranoid for asking questions about chain of custody. About 271,566 more votes than voters in Michigan's own Qualified Voter File. About Pennsylvania certifying 121,240 more votes than voters. About Maricopa County having no documented chain of custody for 740,000 ballots. About California, where a sheriff seized 650,000 ballots and found 45,896 MORE VOTES than ballots cast — and the attorney general went to COURT to stop the count. Paranoid, they said. Debunked, they said. And now, when a president signs an order saying "let's put barcodes on the envelopes and verify citizenship first," the same people who told me fraud was impossible are suddenly in emergency litigation mode. Emergency. This is a five-alarm response to... tracking ballots. And confirming voters are citizens. Two things that should have already been standard practice everywhere. — THE COMMUNIST GOALS SECTION THEY WILL HATE — In 1963, Congressman Albert Herlong read into the Congressional Record a list of 45 Communist Goals for America. Goal #15: "Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States." Goal #20: "Infiltrate the press." An election system that resists verification, resists audits, resists chain of custody, and actively litigates against transparency is not a secure election system. It is a controlled one. I'm not saying that to be dramatic. I'm saying it because that is what the pattern of behavior consistently produces. — THE CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT THEY'RE IGNORING — The Elections Clause. Article I, Section 4. "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such Regulations." The federal government has always had authority over federal elections. The USPS operates under 39 U.S.C. 401. The SAVE program is 42 U.S.C. 1320b-7. The Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act are both explicitly cited in the order itself. This was not improvised. The legal scaffolding was there before the ink dried. Now — these cases WILL go to court. I'm not dismissing that. Litigation is a legitimate process. But the argument that the federal government has zero authority over how federal ballots move through the federal mail system is going to be a genuinely difficult case to make. The word "federal" is doing a lot of work in that sentence. Three times, in fact. — THE SAVE ACT IS ALREADY THERE — H.R. 22, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, passed the House. It requires proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. It's been blocked in the Senate. Eighty percent of Hispanic Americans support voter ID. Seventy-six percent of Black Americans support it. The only group fighting it at the leadership level is the Democratic Party — and they've told us for years this is about protecting voters. I'm starting to wonder which voters, exactly, they're trying to protect. — THE BOTTOM LINE — This is not complicated. If you are a United States citizen, this executive order does not take anything from you. Not your right to vote by mail. Not your ability to participate in elections. Nothing. You will receive a ballot in a trackable, verified envelope. Your citizenship will have been confirmed through federal databases that already exist and already track this information for other purposes. That is it. If you are NOT a United States citizen, this executive order means you will not receive a federal mail-in ballot. Which is... already the law. It has been the law. 18 U.S.C. 611 makes it a federal crime for non-citizens to vote in federal elections. This order just adds the infrastructure to enforce a law that has existed on the books for decades. So when 20 Democrat AGs file emergency litigation to stop the enforcement of a law that already exists, using infrastructure that already exists, to protect a right that is already guaranteed to citizens... maybe the question isn't whether this order is unconstitutional. Maybe the question is what, precisely, they are afraid of finding. But what do I know — I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who actually read the executive order, the constitutional provisions, the federal statutes, and the election data before forming an opinion, instead of just reading the press release and calling a lawyer. #MAGA #Veterans #Trump @libsoftiktok @DC_Draino @EndWokeness @catturd2

Hey @CBSNews I couldn't help but notice this was your headline when Biden was President.

Infuriating

Outstanding find by Maze - GREAT throwback to Dianne Feinstein in 1993: "Should people be able to come to this country, get on Medicaid, give birth to a baby, and then go back to their home country? The answer is no." REPOST this absolutely EVERYWHERE. #thinblueline #lawenforcement

It’s so simple, only a complete moron, or TDS leftist, could possibly misunderstand it. A simple understanding of language, punctuation, and sentence structure helps too. Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan introduced the 14th amendment and said this: "This amendment which I have offered, is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."

Investigation finds 107 Chinese owned surrogacy companies just in Southern California offering American birthright citizenship services exclusively to the elite in China People here in America are being paid $60k to carry babies, the baby gets citizenship and is shipped back to China “$60 grand to carry the child. The child is born. The child will be a U.S citizen because they were born here also. Their biological mother is American. They will then be picked up oftentimes by a third party, not even by the dad picked up by a third party and sent back to China — Just in Southern California, we found 107 Chinese owned surrogacy companies that are offering these services in China to members of the elite. So this is a huge, huge, huge problem”

Why didn't it pass 30+ years ago. Think of all the foreign adversarial "citizens" there are.

2013. CBS News reports on Chinese parents traveling to the US to have anchor babies: “They traveled from China to Los Angeles so their baby could be born in America and claim U.S. citizenship." "They are among thousands of Chinese who become so-called birth tourists staying in maternity hotels near Los Angeles." “Paid $27,000 to a Chinese agency with a website that advertises the advantages of giving birth in America. The agency helps arrange U.S. tourist visas, lodging and medical care." “Allowed the parents to get around China's one-child policy. That restriction does not apply to Chinese who give birth overseas. " "This hilltop home was converted into a maternity hotel that housed as many as 30 pregnant Chinese women at a time." No sane country would allow this.