Script💻

Learn to script for 2025 with my book so you can make all the games you want. See link in bio/reply for a free sneak-peek.

It's not about how much CCU a game has at this instant. It's about how much CCU a game can have and maintain over the long-term (months, years). That, to me, is the real indication of game quality.

Skeleton Army attack (inspired by Clash Royale) from 2021. Could do way better now, but here's what it was 5 years ago.

DM me for scripting commissions

Stylized small jumpscare system.

(this is a picture from studio, not mine)

work so hard that ur actual robux looks like the roblox studio signed 32 bit maximum integer robux

Blazing Tree stuff from 2021. Never made it into my game since I never released it, lol.

Dust storm stuff I scripted in 2021.

Necromancer stuff from 2021. Yes, those are skulls.

@JacobTardy22968 too bad you cant explain how it works without it :P

@script_ing I could make this with ai with a 1 sentence prompt and it could do it in less than 5 seconds

I've been on spring break for this week. Been working on commissions and our own games on the side. Here's something small I've been working on for one of our games.

@Twoket9 delayed gratification

AI devs are cooked. I just wrote a script by hand

@rWonuf wrote in 2020 lol

@script_ing .p .magnitude :(

locked in

chill guys I wrote this in 2020

A cool little loading screen I've been working on

@attemptnomore Client wanted them to fly without welding to achieve the ghost effect

@script_ing twin why are they flying please weld them or something

Updated Vampire system commission for a client.

DM if you need scripting work 🤝

On the AI spectrum, the opposite ends seem to be < (People who oppose AI entirely and type out their code by hand) ------------------ (People who are on the hype train and blindly trust AI to do all their coding) I'm somewhere in the middle. Here's my current stance on AI and coding (for long-term projects): If you cannot code and are prompting AI to code for you and are blindly accepting its changes without understanding the code, you are accepting short term reward for long-term detriment. At some point, the AI will start failing to understand its own code and your code base will be all over the place. If you can code and you are coding alongside AI, and are double checking its code, making sure its structure won't cause future problems, good practices, exploit prevention, learning with it, etc.. I think it will make you an OP scripter. To do all this requires you to already be able to code to some degree. Someone who understands the code and also uses AI to speed up development will have a much easier time fixing bugs, as they have a high level understanding of everything. If a bug occurs that AI has a hard time fixing, the person who can understand the code can probably narrow it down to script X, function Y. The person who blindly trusts it will just be begging it to fix it for a long time. The way I currently use AI is I write a lot of the starting codebase myself. I think about the structure, type definitions, functions I want, etc. And then, I start working alongside it, prompting it to make functions, subsystems, etc. I aim to make sure that I understand the codebase at a high level.