vin

47.7K posts

vin banner
vin

vin

@starrsead

used to be @ tawiinaan

‘06 he/him +63 Sumali Temmuz 2023
471 Sinusundan304 Mga Tagasunod
Naka-pin na Tweet
vin
vin@starrsead·
:PP
vin tweet mediavin tweet mediavin tweet mediavin tweet media
3
0
11
6K
vin nag-retweet
L i l y
L i l y@lilysnotepad·
L i l y tweet media
ZXX
467
11.6K
65.1K
440.3K
vin nag-retweet
jan
jan@jicheolmyluv·
tbh, sa sobrang laki ng nakukuha nila sa mga tao dapat may libreng check up na para sa lahat. May discount sa dental at vision care, professional services at medical devices katulad ng mga wheelchair, hearing aid, etc.
radar PH@radarph_media

PhilHealth is omnipresent in every Filipino’s payslip, taking money whether workers like it or not. Yet in moments of greatest need, it often feels absent. That’s what happened in the viral case of Maria Lourdes Sulit. Her husband Marvin contributed for over 25 years. When he died of a brain hematoma, PhilHealth declined to cover their nearly ₱200,000 hospital bill. The reason: a technicality. He was confined for less than 24 hours. Under PhilHealth Circular No. 2020-0007, inpatient benefits require a 24-hour stay. But Circular No. 2025-0020 allows outpatient emergency benefits in cases ending in death within 24 hours. So which is it, then? Sulit’s case is yet another crack in a system already under strain. PhilHealth is mandatory under the Universal Health Care Law. Every Filipino is automatically enrolled, meaning every worker is required to contribute—regardless of income, preference, or private coverage. And that has long been a point of frustration. Ask any tito, tita, tropa, or kakilala, and a familiar story emerges: PhilHealth often covers only a fraction of the bill. Families still shoulder significant out-of-pocket expenses. Then come the administrative failures: the delays, the waiting, the stress on top of the hospitalization stresses. Private health maintenance organizations help fill some of the gap. But even they can only do so much, often still leaving families exposed to catastrophic expenses that the public system is supposed to cushion. And then, there’s the issue that refuses to go away: corruption. PhilHealth has been repeatedly drawn into controversies involving anomalous claims, questionable reimbursements, and fund management issues that have reached Congress and the courts. The latest one involved around ₱60 billion in excess funds—transferred to the national treasury. The Supreme Court later ruled that it’s unconstitutional, questioning whether health funds were being redirected away from their intended purpose. The money has since been restored to PhilHealth, but its image isn’t getting any better. To many, it remains an agency that collects mandatory contributions, yet Filipinos don't get what they pay for. Calls to abolish PhilHealth continue to surface. Let Filipinos keep their money. Rely on private insurance or personal means instead. It’s understandable—especially in cases like Sulit’s—but abolition without replacement risks dismantling the country’s only nationwide health risk pool. For all its flaws, PhilHealth remains the only attempt at universal coverage at scale. Removing it wouldn’t erase the need for protection. So the real issue is not just whether to abolish PhilHealth, but what must replace or radically reform it. Our Asian neighbors have made clearer choices. Thailand funds universal healthcare through general taxation, allowing patients to access care with minimal or no out-of-pocket costs. Malaysia heavily subsidizes public hospitals, keeping treatment affordable and predictable. South Korea operates a hybrid system where mandatory contributions are matched with reliable, structured coverage at the point of care. The Philippines remains stuck in between: compulsory contributions without guaranteed protection, universal enrollment without universal certainty. Now, the question is no longer whether PhilHealth should exist. Can it continue in its current form when the gap between contribution and protection remains this wide? Can Filipinos still afford to pay premiums to a system they cannot rely on in a life-and-death situation? Otherwise, PhilHealth only gives Filipinos hell.

Filipino
1
1.4K
4.9K
76.5K
vin nag-retweet
King🇩🇴🏳️‍⚧️
King🇩🇴🏳️‍⚧️@Tashaspartner·
White people be like: "You're such a forced representation bro :/"
King🇩🇴🏳️‍⚧️ tweet media
English
35
2.8K
33.8K
157K
vin nag-retweet
ً
ً@wi5t3ria·
twitter search
ً tweet media
English
36
1.6K
24.3K
242.7K
vin nag-retweet
ࣴ
@Iovesicckgirls·
it's kinda difficult to believe this sisterhood thing when hybe kicked out a girl in each of these groups
ࣴ tweet media
English
57
1.5K
18.8K
186.8K
vin nag-retweet
Nichol
Nichol@nicholnicholnii·
nag-concert siya dito ₱1500 ang ticket tapos lahat ng kinita niya dinonate niya sa charity. Paanong naging performative si Olivia?
J@swiftalite

@missmessypoets I mean, if she only genuinely cared about her heritage instead of reducing it to performative moments and serving us pale chicken lumpia, her fellow Filipinos would’ve backed her. At this point, she’s no different from Vanessa Hudgens.

Filipino
15
444
4.6K
119.7K
vin nag-retweet
sab 𝝑𝝔
sab 𝝑𝝔@k1ttyhr_·
this lineup gay af😭 let’s all WORK IT for pride month
English
7
588
4K
33.5K
vin nag-retweet
erin 🎲
erin 🎲@yunseoyoungs·
using a song called “woman” with lyrics such as “define feminine” to describe 3 boy groups we’re in hell
English
46
1.1K
10.1K
152.6K
vin nag-retweet
rub
rub@hhaechanvs·
when im playing nct bean boozled and get april 3rd 2026 instead of jaehyun happy trail
English
7
316
2.5K
22.3K
vin nag-retweet
luna ꕤ
luna ꕤ@neotfy·
BIG DICK BACK IN SEOUL
English
15
836
5.1K
35K