
Tom Lambert
498 posts

Tom Lambert
@tomagain
I drink tea and look out the window. Sometimes I climb or ski or run or read or write or drive a snowplow. I'm not an expert in anything. Read accordingly.




Important dataset, but wrong framing leading to misinformation. They adjust for volume, then claim intensity is superior. A huge flaw in the study is the determination of high intensity which for the authors is >6METs which is ~21 mL O₂/kg/min… So the reality is that this high intensity is in the range of Z1-Z3 for many people…😬…That is not high intensity for most. And low intensity in the study is <6METS which for many is not even a brisk walk or just Z1 To produce intensity: • ↑ ATP turnover • ↑ glycolysis • ↑ lactate To sustain it: • mitochondrial capacity • NAD⁺/NADH balance • lactate clearance This study doesn’t even mention metabolism or bioenergetics… However, the main thing is misinformation as we keep falling into the same trap: either intensity or volume. It’s both! And more importantly, exercise must be individualized, whether for an elite athlete or a patient. academic.oup.com/eurheartj/adva…









⚠️ Dose-response interplay between light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on all-cause mortality risk 🏃♀️ ❤️ A causal inference analysis 📉 READ ➡️ bit.ly/3Ps1upn


@Alan_Couzens Not even some strides? Quite strick!




This is why we need more endurance coaches (who know how VO2max is actually improved) and less "fitness influencers" around these parts 🤦♂️








The older you get, the more expensive your mistakes become. One impatient jump in volume, one extra session before you've recovered, and you're sidelined for weeks... sometimes months. What bounced back in two days at 35 costs you a season at 65.









