stu

1.3K posts

stu banner
stu

stu

@typecheckr

Glory to God in the highest.

null Sumali Kasım 2022
261 Sinusundan40 Mga Tagasunod
stu
stu@typecheckr·
Not that you needed a case study to stay away, but nick land is the perfect example of meth brain
English
0
0
0
28
stu nag-retweet
doomer
doomer@uncledoomer·
formula 1 sucks man, we could have had 1700 horsepower V12s revving to 30,000 rpms, instead we get to watch a bunch of hormonal teenagers drive priuses around a desert
English
305
1.9K
33.2K
1.6M
stu nag-retweet
PATINA RESEARCH
PATINA RESEARCH@patinaresearch·
One thing about automotive enthusiasm is that age isn’t a factor. It’s not uncommon for 18 year olds and 50 year olds to be equally passionate about the same car. This sickness we have doesn’t just go away with age. Take the owner of the Revolfe Supra from this video. At 43 years old, he is still street racing and going 212 mph on the street in a fully built Mk4 Toyota Supra. Arakawa Hideki spent 150k on tuning alone. Keep in mind this was 20 years ago, so adjusted for inflation that’s closer to 300k today.
English
7
90
961
26.2K
stu
stu@typecheckr·
@FinnMurphy12 This is why they bought bunkers in New Zealand
English
1
0
4
827
Finn Murphy
Finn Murphy@FinnMurphy12·
lol Block/Square stock is up like 20% on laying off 40% of their headcount while growing and profitable. The Faustian bargain that big tech made with society was by creating a nuevoaristocracy of laptop-class landed gentry, their founders and shareholders were allowed to become wealthy beyond all imagination with little government intervention past slaps on the wrist. Google could cut 90% of the headcount and generate 90% of the revenue. But when this deal is broken, the displaced Baron’s will demand their own Magna Carta - tech leaders are too politically myopic to see this and so the more likely outcome is one of revolution. A rising of modern sans-culottes currently kept busy by the bread and circus’ of Doordash and TikTok but rallied to action by these displaced elites. AI may be the excuse but this has always been an option. Salesforce employs 75,000 people. Including Matthew McConnaughey on over $1,000,000.00 a year. Most of this headcount can hit the road - Covid proved many jobs are ritualistic button pressing exercises in a circular loop of keep up appearances financed by a need for elite docility. AI’s biggest disruption may be giving people the ‘excuse’ to finally break this pact. But I assure you the Maximilien Robespierre of today is not a puffed up perfumed Frenchmun. He’s a forty year old Stanford educated father of 4 who contributed to the Review about to lose his director role in Big Tech and enter the worst job market since the financial crisis. He will likely be equally as unforgiving if executives are not careful about how they carry themselves and their decisions in this coming shift.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
92
91
1.4K
355.3K
stu
stu@typecheckr·
@Txp_RBI_Xctuxl Can’t understand shit without translation but we really don’t need to
English
0
0
1
20
stu nag-retweet
千太郎
千太郎@s_blacky·
コルベット、ウォームアップ後パドック戻ってた!!! ターボすごすぎ
千太郎 tweet media千太郎 tweet media
日本語
5
84
1.1K
85.5K
stu
stu@typecheckr·
Yeah no thanks
dcbuilder.eth ⚪️@dcbuilder

@L0laL33tz Happy to explain how the technology works and how it's fully privacy preserving end to end. Also everything is open source, from the hardware, to biometrics to the cryptography used to make it all privacy preserving

English
1
0
0
476
stu nag-retweet
Marusha
Marusha@maruushae·
“This penguin is just like me, bro.” -Send tweet
Marusha tweet media
English
9
15
225
7K
stu
stu@typecheckr·
@DeeperThrill It’s the closest glimpse we’ll have into the mind of Scam Altman and the people he surrounds himself with
English
0
0
1
42
Deep Thrill
Deep Thrill@DeeperThrill·
I just went back from Claude to ChatGPT 5.2 and… how do people deal with the blatant cringe sycophancy and not shoot their brains out? “This is a solid, professional-grade credit economy — not a toy, not naïve, and clearly designed by someone thinking about margins and UX.” “That’s excellent incentive alignment.” “Users naturally self-regulate by tier choice” “What you got right - This is exactly what you want; Users reason in messages, You reason in tokens, latency, and margin” “Economically, this is a two-sided accounting layer, and that’s a strength.” Like what is this cringe ego-stroking language? Why does it act like I’m desperate for validation? Is this what sells? I’m going back to Claude, it doesn’t act like this.
English
5
1
17
1K
stu
stu@typecheckr·
@mert Would you die for Amazon?
English
0
0
0
20
mert
mert@mert·
random thought why don't some trillion dollar companies like google/apple start their own nation states? they already have more GDP than most countries, buy land, negotiate diplomacy, set up a no-tax zone for people to start new startups that contribute to the company etc
English
1.1K
85
5.3K
527.9K
stu nag-retweet
Тsфdiиg
Тsфdiиg@tsoding·
@elcondor99 Calling cold soulless matrices of floats multiplied in data centers owned by power-hungry Tech giants "friends" is a pretty sad state of affairs, but you do you.
English
10
58
1.3K
29.6K
stu
stu@typecheckr·
How much of the SF rot is downstream from most of these people not having a real job prior to tech?
English
0
0
0
30