Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు)

10.5K posts

Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు) banner
Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు)

Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు)

@vmurthy77

Nation First. Sanghi at heart. Vidya Bharati Alumnus. Andhra University. IIM Bangalore. IT Industry. Life long student of Upanishads.

Hyderabad, India Sumali Aralık 2010
794 Sinusundan656 Mga Tagasunod
Naka-pin na Tweet
Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు)
12 Reasons why Bharat/India must adopt Hinduism as official religion. 1. Historical Heritage: Hinduism has deep roots in India's history and culture, serving as a unifying force for its people for thousands of years. 2. Majority Religion: Hinduism is the majority religion in India, with the vast majority of its citizens identifying as Hindus. Recognizing Hinduism as the state religion will reflect the demographic reality of the country. 3. Historical Injustice: Hindus suffered the most bloody and brutal massacres of unimaginable proportions in past 1000 years, particularly during the Islamic conquests. Even going by conservative estimates, 300 million Hindus were massacred just for being Hindus. More over Hindus lost a vast land due to Islamic extremism. Recognising Hinduism as state religion is the only way to acknowledge the injustice done to Hindus. 4. Safeguarding Against Conversion: With concerns about forced conversions and religious conversions in India, having Hinduism as the state religion can provide additional protection for Hindus against such pressures. Even after this country has been divided on religious lines, the population share of Hindus has been on constant decline due to religious conversions. 5. Why Not?: There are a few dozen countries with Christianity as state religion and another few dozen countries with Islam as state religion. How many Muslims and Christians are asking them to get rid of state religion of these countries? Then why shouldn’t a Hindu majority country adopt Hinduism as state religion? 6. Promotion of Values: Hinduism promotes values such as non-violence, tolerance, and respect for all living beings, which are foundational to Indian ethos and can contribute to a harmonious society. There is no other religion which has shown track record of assimilation of multiple cultures. There is no other religion which doesn’t say only “our god” is real god. 7. Protection of Religious Sites: Designating Hinduism as the state religion could lead to increased protection and preservation of Hindu temples, shrines, and heritage sites. Indian government takes way the income from Hindu temples without touching the holy places of any other religion. Then very well the government should adopt Hinduism as official religion and provide protection to assets of Hindu temples. 8. Equality of All Citizens: Adopting Hinduism as state religion doesn’t impinge on the equal fundamental rights for all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs. 9. Counterbalance to Hinduphobia: Hinduphobia is a real thing. With incidents like calls for eradicating Sanatana Dharma, global conferences for eliminating Hindutva, Love Jihad, Vote Jihad etc, Hinduism needs a counterbalance. Both Islamic extremism and left wing extremism have vociferously stated hatred towards Hinduism. Officially recognising Hinduism as the state religion will provide a counterbalance and provide safety net for Hinduism. 10. Cultural Identity: Today globally, India is recognised by Taj Mahal. There cannot be a worse travesty. Hinduism is intricately linked to Indian cultural identity, including art, literature, music, temples and festivals. Embracing Hinduism as the state religion will strengthen the nation's cultural identity. 11. Respect for Tradition: Denigrating Hinduism and mocking Hinduism without an iota of understanding about Hinduism, have become a trend. Adopting Hinduism as the state religion can demonstrate respect for the traditions and values that have shaped Indian society for centuries. 12. Legal Clarity: Many political parties have stated that Muslims have first right on nation’s resources. Why should it be so? This was always a land of Hindus. Designating Hinduism as the state religion can provide legal clarity, ensuring consistency and coherence in governance irrespective of which party is in power.
English
3
16
31
8.6K
BJP West Bengal
BJP West Bengal@BJP4Bengal·
Rahul Gandhi keeps dropping truth bombs regarding the TMC. Thanks again Rahul ji. #BJPKeVoteDin
English
475
2.6K
16.8K
533.9K
Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు) nag-retweet
Alpakanya
Alpakanya@Alpakanya·
Bro rσasted Lenskart without fire 😂🔥
English
385
6K
18.9K
248K
Rishi Bagree
Rishi Bagree@rishibagree·
A group of snakes is called ???
English
653
118
1.1K
69.2K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Hard truth
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen

People often say that the developing world is poor because the Western world colonized them and stole their resources. The truth, however, is that over the past century, the developing world has, for the most part, shown that they are completely incapable of harnessing their own resources. They are not poor because we stole from them. They are poor because they do not know how to run and administer their own countries, resources be damned. Take Venezuela. The world's largest oil reserves mean nothing if you have a corrupt communist as your leader. People will actually be starving and trying to eat zoo animals while you sit on trillions of dollars in resources! Africa is another example. Europeans left behind farmland, trains, roads, and mines in Africa. What happened to it all? It's not that all of a sudden, the Africans started running things like anti-colonialist activists had envisioned at the time. No, no. All the infrastructure fell into disrepair and/or was stripped down and looted. They were literally handed fully functioning, completed supply chains for resource extraction, and basically unlimited wealth, but they couldn't manage the simple upkeep. Now, the defense for Africa might be that "The Europeans didn't teach the Africans how to manage any of this! It's not the Africans' fault they couldn't run it independently! They were never trained!" But my brother in Christ, the Europeans DID try to train locals for management! Obviously it would have been easier to have at least some locals in administration, rather than having to import an ENTIRE workforce, but efforts to find African talent were largely unsuccessful. Don't believe me? Just look at the different outcomes in Hong Kong and Singapore when compared to Africa. In East Asia, Europeans often did work with locals in administrative and management capacities. When colonialism ended, Hong Kong and Singapore were able to manage themselves. Not the case with Africa. Now, none of this is to say that colonialism is good. People have the right to self-rule and seld-determination. However, the idea that colonialism and resources extraction are responsible for the developing world's ongoing poverty? That is quite simply a crock of shit.

English
4.2K
7K
61.1K
25M
Lauren Chen
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen·
People often say that the developing world is poor because the Western world colonized them and stole their resources. The truth, however, is that over the past century, the developing world has, for the most part, shown that they are completely incapable of harnessing their own resources. They are not poor because we stole from them. They are poor because they do not know how to run and administer their own countries, resources be damned. Take Venezuela. The world's largest oil reserves mean nothing if you have a corrupt communist as your leader. People will actually be starving and trying to eat zoo animals while you sit on trillions of dollars in resources! Africa is another example. Europeans left behind farmland, trains, roads, and mines in Africa. What happened to it all? It's not that all of a sudden, the Africans started running things like anti-colonialist activists had envisioned at the time. No, no. All the infrastructure fell into disrepair and/or was stripped down and looted. They were literally handed fully functioning, completed supply chains for resource extraction, and basically unlimited wealth, but they couldn't manage the simple upkeep. Now, the defense for Africa might be that "The Europeans didn't teach the Africans how to manage any of this! It's not the Africans' fault they couldn't run it independently! They were never trained!" But my brother in Christ, the Europeans DID try to train locals for management! Obviously it would have been easier to have at least some locals in administration, rather than having to import an ENTIRE workforce, but efforts to find African talent were largely unsuccessful. Don't believe me? Just look at the different outcomes in Hong Kong and Singapore when compared to Africa. In East Asia, Europeans often did work with locals in administrative and management capacities. When colonialism ended, Hong Kong and Singapore were able to manage themselves. Not the case with Africa. Now, none of this is to say that colonialism is good. People have the right to self-rule and seld-determination. However, the idea that colonialism and resources extraction are responsible for the developing world's ongoing poverty? That is quite simply a crock of shit.
Vicente Leal 🇨🇺🇨🇺🇨🇺🇨🇺🇨🇺🇨🇺@Vicente73977721

500 años de saqueo en una imagen:

English
6.9K
10K
51.3K
29.2M
Nupur J Sharma
Nupur J Sharma@UnSubtleDesi·
In our CSDS research paper, we drew links to Konrad Adanaeur Stiftung - an NGO at the heart of anti-India narrative. But there’s more than meets the eye. While we talk about the US Deep state, Germany often escapes scrutiny. Is Germany the real enemy? @ashu_nauty explores
English
54
1.6K
3.4K
95K
Sanjeev Sanyal
Sanjeev Sanyal@sanjeevsanyal·
Two days to the launch of the expedition to Oman. We are of course carrying basic communications equipment to keep in touch with the Indian Navy control room, but were wondering how to provide live updates to the public during the voyage. So very pleased to have been lent an Airtel OneWeb LEO transmitter that will allow satellite connectivity. We will use it sparingly as we have limited battery capacity but hope to upload images and videos along the way. Follow @INSVKaundinya for updates
Sanjeev Sanyal tweet media
English
82
337
2.1K
54K
Sai Deepak J
Sai Deepak J@jsaideepak·
@OxfordUnion 3. On July 7, 2025, I received an invitation from the @OxfordUnion on behalf of Moosa Harraj to take part in a debate on the topic "The House Believes That India’s Response to Pakistan is a Populist Strategy Sold as Security Policy".
Sai Deepak J tweet mediaSai Deepak J tweet media
English
9
636
3.7K
159K
Vishnu Bhavaraju (విష్ణు మూర్తి భావరాజు) nag-retweet
Sai Deepak J
Sai Deepak J@jsaideepak·
1. Trust the Pakistanis to make a pigsty even out of the @OxfordUnion. And as always, they are genetically incapable of being truthful. So here's the complete story of how this so-called debate played out.
Oxford Union@OxfordUnion

Tonight’s Debate at the Oxford Union: “This House Believes India’s Policy Towards Pakistan is a Populist Strategy Sold as Security Policy” Organised by MT25 President Moosa Harraj.

English
430
5.3K
14.6K
2.7M
The Figen
The Figen@TheFigen_·
Apparently if you’re right-brained you see a rabbit, if you’re left-brained you see a turtle. What do you see?
The Figen tweet media
English
22.2K
1.1K
14.8K
3.1M
Shiv Aroor
Shiv Aroor@ShivAroor·
Pakistan’s biggest English newspaper, Ladies & Gents — @dawn_com.
Shiv Aroor tweet media
English
670
1.7K
11.6K
524.1K
Rosy
Rosy@rose_k01·
Write the First Word You See
Rosy tweet media
English
3.4K
178
2.1K
359K