@blank_Schwi@onlysammms You acknowledge that pregnancy requires two people, then immediately assign all moral responsibility to one. Do you not see the contradiction?
@ARKgcg@reef_blu_302@onlysammms So your position isn't really about protecting life. It's about deciding which women deserve choices and which ones deserve punishment.
@016_00@reef_blu_302@onlysammms You said “an accident with contraceptives” as implying that she had taken precautions. Now you’re calling it an accident with contraceptives when she didn’t use any contraception at all and was completely irresponsible.
So I was completely right. It was an excuse.
@ARKgcg@reef_blu_302@onlysammms An unplanned pregnancy is still an accident, whether contraception was used or not. Calling it an 'excuse' doesn't address the actual question of bodily autonomy.
Se quejan de que abortar es "asesinato" pero si una mujer se liga las trompas para no tener hijos le dicen que es una egoísta de mierda y que se va a arrepentir. O sea, quieren que tenga hijos sí o sí. No es por la "vida", es por control...
@blank_Schwi@onlysammms If telling women to suppress their instincts is considered reasonable, why isn't telling men to suppress theirs? Either both are responsible for their actions, or neither is.
@blank_Schwi@onlysammms "Unaligned with instincts" isn't an excuse. We expect people to control plenty of instincts every day. Funny how that argument only seems to get used when it's men's responsibility being discussed.