Alex Osinga

Bring back the Real Formula One!

Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 and Temperature Over Last Three Million Years Stumps Net Zero Activists | Chris Morrison, Watts Up With That? The climate science world (‘settled’ division) is in shock following the discovery in ancient ice cores that levels of carbon dioxide remained stable as the world plunged into an ice age around 2.7 million years ago. Levels of CO2 at around 250 parts per million (ppm) were said to be lower than often assumed with just a 20 ppm movement recorded for the following near three million-year period. In addition, no changes in methane levels were seen in the entire period. Massive decreases in temperature with occasional interglacial rises appear to have occurred without troubling ‘greenhouse’ gas levels, and this revelation has caused near panic in activist circles. The assumed level three million years ago of CO2 was around 400 ppm, a convenient mark that has been used to explain the subsequent ice age and a drop to 250 ppm. Due to the recently published paper, this explanation has become more problematic and natural climate variation is correctly noted to have occurred with the temperature changes. Alas, similar explanations are mostly ignored in discussing today’s climate changes in the interests of promoting the Net Zero fantasy. Some cling desperately to a dominant CO2 role, including one of the authors of the findings published in Nature. The co-author states that the results suggest even greater climate sensitivity to the warming effect of CO2. In short, there is a great deal of applying the laws of physics and chemistry to one era, but failing to extend the same courtesy to another. The title of the paper, produced by 17 America-based scientists, was enough to set alarm bells ringing in the ‘settled’ science, Net Zero-obsessed community: ‘Broadly stable atmospheric CO2 and CH4 levels over the past three million years.’ A related paper examining ocean heat content derived from the ice core record was also published. Carrie Lear, Professor of Past Climates and Earth System Changes at Cardiff University, claimed that the papers “don’t rewrite the role of CO2, they underline how sensitive the climate system is… that is why today’s rapid CO2 rise is so alarming”. Ah, yes. Even if CO2 movements are minimal, probably within a margin of potential error, they are still responsible for large variations in temperature. The laws of climate science are ‘settled’ – if the trace atmospheric gas CO2 is rising, falling or generally stable, it is almost wholly responsible for large movements in global temperature. Under this rather shaky assumption, humans must stop burning hydrocarbons and return to a neo-Malthusian pre-industrial age. Study lead author Julia Marks-Peterson noted: “We definitely were a bit surprised. If correct, the findings may suggest that even small changes in greenhouse gas levels could trigger major shifts in climate.” That’s a little bit of a scary thought, she added, possibly with an eye on future grant funding. “May suggest” is doing a lot of the work here, and it may also be suggested that more plausible opinions are available. Quoted in New Scientist magazine, Tim Naish, Professor of Earth Science at Victoria University in New Zealand, said it was “way too early to thrown the baby out with the bathwater”. Perish the thought that baby should be given its marching orders, ending a science-lite 40-year demonisation of CO2 and related promotion of a hard-Left Net Zero dream. The latest Nature-published research gives a snapshot from ancient Antarctica ‘blue’ ice drilled in the Allan Hills area. It looks back further in time past the usual 800,000 ice core records. The key finding is that over the last three million years, when sea levels fell and ice periods intensified, the level of the main ‘greenhouse’ gases remained remarkably stable. For the first time, the work has pushed the direct gas measurements back into the late Pliocene era. Over the last three million years moving into the Pleistocene, global temperatures showed a long-term cooling trend of several degrees Celsius, interrupted by increasingly large interglacial oscillations. Interglacial temperature swings, as in the current Holocene, often see temperatures rise by 5°C and more. Critics seeking to downplay ice core evidence often suggest it is too imprecise to provide a wholly accurate record of gas levels and temperature. But it is accurate enough to give a broad cyclical insight. It remains the source of some of the best data we have on the past climate. It is undoubtedly more accurate than most proxy evidence from millions of years ago. But whatever the evidence used, it is hard to detect any obvious and continuous link between CO2 and temperature across the entire geological record going back 600 million years to the start of abundant life on Earth. Certainly none to justify the political notion that humans control the climate thermostat by burning hydrocarbons. In fact the evidence is so slim that Les Hatton, Emeritus Professor in Computer Science at Kingston University, was recently able to determine from ice core records that 100-year rises of 1.1°C in the current interglacial, which started 20,000 years ago, have occurred in one in six centuries. Going back 150,000 years, the frequency was around one in six to one in 20 centuries. None of these findings suggest that current warming is either unusual or primarily caused by human activity. Needless to say, none of these findings trouble the headline writers in narrative-addicted mainstream media. wattsupwiththat.com/2026/03/28/sho…

🔥 NIEUWSBERICHT: Grok heeft zojuist IPCC-klimaatbeleidsfraude aan het licht gebracht "Het hele bouwwerk van klimaatbeleid, net-nul doelstellingen, energierantsoenering, koolstofbelastingen en apocalyptische 'klimaatverandering'-verhalen, dat vele biljoenen dollars heeft gekost, is gebouwd op een constructie waarvan de klassieke natuurkunde zelf stelt dat die geen enkele fysieke realiteit heeft." @2eKamertweets @MinPres @ongehoordnedtv @AndereKrant @_GezondVerstand Lees het zelf: grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5…

@jesseklaver Hahahaha

Dit land verdient een nieuwe politiek die vooruitgang vooropstelt voor ons allemaal. Die staat voor eerlijk delen. Voor standvastig zijn en trouw blijven aan wie je bent. Dat is waar wij voor zijn opgericht. Welkom thuis bij Progressief Nederland.

@maartenpodcast En dit allemaal uit je grote duim gezogen...

Trump kleineerde Zelensky, maar staat zelf schaakmat in Iran. Zijn 15-puntenplan ligt in de prullenbak. Iran eist herstelbetalingen. Met de Straat van Hormuz als geopolitieke wurggreep staat hij met lege handen. Wie heeft hier nu de kaarten in handen?open.spotify.com/episode/5mBT6c…

@jesseklaver Wat een enorme flopnaam

Progressief Nederland, roepnaam: PRO. Dat is de nieuwe naam van GroenLinks-PvdA. PRO staat voor een eerlijke en rechtvaardige samenleving. Ik ben Pro. Jij ook? progressiefnederland.nl

New Study: Ice Core Data Shows Modern Warming Is Statistically Unremarkable climatechangedispatch.com/ice-core-data-… via @ccdeditor Yes, the doctored hockey stick of Mann built climate alarmism on deceit.

@ayeshavisk41781 40

What is the missing number..? Only 1% will succeed

@Arden_2210 34

Most people say 13 But that’s not correct If you solve this, your brain is sharp 🔥

New evidence from Antarctica ice cores showing no link between CO2 and temperature over the last three million years has stumped Net Zero activists, says Chris Morrison. dailysceptic.org/2026/03/25/sho…

@Arden_2210 18

If you solve this, your IQ is high 🔥 What should come instead of ?

@antonioguterres @WMO Retard

Our global climate is in a state of emergency. The latest @WMO report clearly shows that every key climate indicator is flashing red. The way ahead must be grounded in science, common sense & the courage to take urgent #ClimateAction. wmo.int/news/media-cen…

You wouldn't know it because the press won't report on it, but parts of Alaska have had their coldest winter in years, in some places, decades. Fairbanks, for instance, has had its 2nd coldest December 1st to March 22 period on record since 1904-05.

@Kirs67 Europa gebruikt geen olie uit midden oosten. Amsterdam 1 van de grootste bezine havens ter wereld. Onze prijzen slaan nergens op. Is puur belasting

Wat ik mij afvroeg: als die extreemrechtse wappen die zo tegen windenergie en EV’s zijn, zijn dat dezelfden die nu schreeuwen dat de benzine te duur is? Waarbij ze vergeten te melden dat de veroorzakers hiervan hun helden Trump en Netanyahu zijn?

@0xChiraag You owed 100K but gave 2 K back is 98K / 2 is 49K PER PERSON. So what's the question ?

I borrowed 50k from Dad and 50k from Mum to buy a laptop that costs 97k. After the purchase, I had 3k left. I returned 1k to Dad and 1k to Mum, and I reserved 1k for myself. I now owe Dad 49k and Mum 49k also. 49k + 49k = 98k plus 1k I reserved for myself, which is 99k. So where did 1k go..?

Heeft u nog twijfels ten aanzien van corruptie?

berliner-zeitung.de/wirtschaft-ver… Oekraïne overspoelt de EU met antibiotica eieren. Waar blijft de druk van de altijd zo ‘bezige’ Europese Commissie onder leiding van haar machtige consiglieri ?

THE TRUTH ABOUT CO2: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by ~800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink.

365 jaar aan temperatuurdata uit Midden-Engeland, de oudste ononderbroken klimaatreeks ter wereld, laten geen trend zien. Ondanks een verzesvoudiging van de bevolking en een sterke stijging van de CO₂-uitstoot zijn de temperaturen in januari sinds 1600 nauwelijks veranderd. Ook voor juli, de warmste maand van het jaar, zijn de temperaturen vrijwel onveranderd gebleven. Zelfs tijdens de door steenkool aangedreven Industriële Revolutie was er geen plotselinge piek. De warmste winters ooit gemeten deden zich voor in de 18e, 19e en vroege 20e eeuw, lang vóór de moderne uitstoot. De opwarming verloopt traag en op natuurlijke wijze, waarbij de lichte stijging in de recente tijd waarschijnlijk te wijten is aan twee factoren: 1) het stedelijk hitte-eilandeffect, en 2) het geleidelijke herstel van de aarde na de Kleine IJstijd. Als kooldioxide werkelijk bepalend zou zijn voor het klimaat, zou de CET-grafiek aan de rechterkant omhoog schieten. Dat is echter niet het geval. Met dank aan @Electroversenet

@BlockBenny Waarom laag? Dit is wat Jetten zegt en vindt. De enige nsb'er is Rob

Geert Wilders gaat full NSB. Lekker klikken bij De Grote Leider. Ontzettend laag en enorm laf. Het blijkt; Wilders denkt alleen maar aan zichzelf. Sneue man, slechte verliezer en een schande voor dit land. Vieze verrader.