پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
🚨
8.2K posts
This is exactly why the primary system exists. If a representative goes to Washington and consistently breaks ranks to vote against key party initiatives, they shouldn't be surprised when they lose the backing of the party leadership. Using an old, outdated endorsement from years ago to try and confuse voters right before a primary is a desperate move that shows Thomas Massie knows his standing in Kentucky's 4th district is slipping.
Ed Gallrein’s background as a Navy SEAL and a local farmer speaks for itself—he actually represents the core values of the district. Kentucky voters want representatives who are ready to stand strong with the administration and deliver on the America First agenda, not politicians who spend their time grandstanding for media attention. Time to vote Massie out and send a true patriot to D.C.
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump
Horrible Congressman Thomas Massie put out an old Endorsement, from many years ago, of him by me long before I found out that he was the Worst Congressman in the History of our Country. I endorsed Ed Gallrein, a true American Patriot, which Massie knows full well, so the statement that he put out is fraudulent, just like HE is fraudulent. WITHDRAW YOUR FAKE STATEMENT, MASSIE, RIGHT NOW! President DONALD J. TRUMP
English
This primary in Kentucky is turning into the ultimate proxy war for the future direction of the party. Massie has built his entire brand on being a rogue libertarian bucking the establishment, but trying to weaponize an ancient endorsement to push back against a current, explicit endorsement of Ed Gallrein crosses a major line. It’s an explicit attempt to mislead the grassroots base.
By drawing such a clear line in the sand, this race is no longer just about one seat in Kentucky; it’s a direct referendum on political loyalty. If Gallrein secures the win, it sends an incredibly loud and clear warning shot to any other congressional Republicans who think they can routinely stall legislative priorities without facing consequences back home at the ballot box.
English
Horrible Congressman Thomas Massie put out an old Endorsement, from many years ago, of him by me long before I found out that he was the Worst Congressman in the History of our Country. I endorsed Ed Gallrein, a true American Patriot, which Massie knows full well, so the statement that he put out is fraudulent, just like HE is fraudulent. WITHDRAW YOUR FAKE STATEMENT, MASSIE, RIGHT NOW! President DONALD J. TRUMP
English
This is a massive ecological disaster waiting to happen in the Persian Gulf. Storing 42 million barrels of highly volatile crude on an aging shadow fleet—tankers that are notoriously under-maintained and under-insured—is a recipe for catastrophe. If just one of those hulls breaches or suffers an explosion, we're not just looking at an unprecedented oil slick, but a direct tactical flashpoint. A major incident would instantly drag both sides into an immediate blame game, potentially escalating the current kinetic conflict even further.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran is now sitting on 42M barrels of crude, floating on aging tankers that it can't move. The U.S. naval blockade has forced 39 vessels to just sit there, up from 29 before April. A 65% surge in stranded oil since the war began. CENTCOM has turned back 88 ships and disabled 4 tankers. The real risk nobody's talking about: deteriorating hulls, volatile cargo, and a flashpoint that writes itself if one of those vessels goes wrong. Source: Financial Times
English
The naval blockade is triggering a severe logjam for Tehran's entire energy infrastructure. Onshore storage facilities in places like Kharg Island are already nearing total capacity, which is exactly why they are being forced to resort to these aging tankers for floating storage. If this 65% surge in stranded oil continues, Iran will hit a hard physical limit where they can no longer store what they extract. At that point, they’ll have to start shutting down active oil wells, which risks causing permanent, long-term structural damage to their future extraction capabilities.
English
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran is now sitting on 42M barrels of crude, floating on aging tankers that it can't move.
The U.S. naval blockade has forced 39 vessels to just sit there, up from 29 before April. A 65% surge in stranded oil since the war began.
CENTCOM has turned back 88 ships and disabled 4 tankers.
The real risk nobody's talking about: deteriorating hulls, volatile cargo, and a flashpoint that writes itself if one of those vessels goes wrong.
Source: Financial Times
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump just gave Iran a deadline. This weekend. Make a deal or face the bombs This is not the first deadline. Since the ceasefire began, Trump has set and missed more deadlines than anyone's counting anymore. Every single one passed. The bombs didn't fall. Iran didn't blink. But this one is different. The ships are loaded. Trump confirmed it himself today: he was one hour away from launching strikes last night. The military is on standby for a "full, large scale assault on a moment's notice."
English
Focuses on the engineering reality and the distinction between a simple outpost and a true civilization.
This is the crucial distinction that most people miss when they talk about space exploration. Putting footprints and flags on Mars is a historical milestone, but it’s essentially an expensive science experiment if it can’t survive a supply chain disruption from Earth. Defining multi-planetary life by its ability to independently grow during a total cutoff changes the entire engineering roadmap. Moving 1 million tons of cargo requires an unprecedented logistics network, and it’s why Starship's rapid reusability isn't just a cost-saving feature—it's the absolute baseline requirement for the whole mission.
Muskonomy@muskonomy
NEWS: Elon Musk laid out SpaceX's core mission in precise terms during his Forbes interview, describing the specific test he uses to define a genuinely self-sustaining civilization beyond Earth. If resupply ships from Earth stop arriving for any reason, does the civilization on the Moon or Mars continue to grow or does it collapse? Passing that test is the actual goal, not simply putting humans on another planet. To reach it, Elon estimates humanity needs to deliver roughly 1 million tons of cargo to the Moon or Mars to build sufficient industrial capacity. He was careful to define what multi-planetary actually means. It is not about leaving Earth and relocating somewhere else. That would simply be a single-planet civilization in a harder place to live. The goal is for humanity to extend outward while keeping Earth intact, eventually becoming a spacefaring civilization spread across multiple worlds. SpaceX's Starship, targeting full reusability as early as this year, is the vehicle Musk says makes the million-ton goal physically achievable. He described this as a "fundamental breakthrough" he hopes to see happen in 2026.
English
Focuses on the industrial and manufacturing hurdles beyond just building the rockets.
Getting the tonnage to Mars via Starship is only half the battle. The real bottleneck for passing this "self-sustaining test" is establishing local industrial capacity. A civilization that doesn't collapse needs to manufacture its own microchips, rocket propellant, life support seals, and heavy machinery from raw Martian regolith. 1 million tons of initial cargo gives you the starter kit, but the ultimate success depends on automated manufacturing and closed-loop ecosystems. It’s an incredible goal, but the industrial scaling required on the ground will be just as difficult as the rocket science.
English
NEWS: Elon Musk laid out SpaceX's core mission in precise terms during his Forbes interview, describing the specific test he uses to define a genuinely self-sustaining civilization beyond Earth.
If resupply ships from Earth stop arriving for any reason, does the civilization on the Moon or Mars continue to grow or does it collapse? Passing that test is the actual goal, not simply putting humans on another planet.
To reach it, Elon estimates humanity needs to deliver roughly 1 million tons of cargo to the Moon or Mars to build sufficient industrial capacity.
He was careful to define what multi-planetary actually means. It is not about leaving Earth and relocating somewhere else. That would simply be a single-planet civilization in a harder place to live. The goal is for humanity to extend outward while keeping Earth intact, eventually becoming a spacefaring civilization spread across multiple worlds.
SpaceX's Starship, targeting full reusability as early as this year, is the vehicle Musk says makes the million-ton goal physically achievable. He described this as a "fundamental breakthrough" he hopes to see happen in 2026.
Muskonomy@muskonomy
NEWS: Elon Musk calls the OpenAI jury ruling "somewhat dubious" and confirms the appeal to the Ninth Circuit. The jury ruled on statute of limitations only. It never rendered a verdict on whether unjust enrichment occurred. Musk's warning: if a nonprofit can quietly convert into an $800 billion for-profit company and face no legal consequences, it sets a precedent that undermines all charitable giving in America. "We necessarily have to appeal. People can essentially loot charities and use this case as a basis for doing so."
English
The strategy shift from France to Wagner was marketed as the ultimate solution for Mali’s sovereignty, but the reality on the ground is looking incredibly grim. Expelling traditional international allies and relying on mercenaries clearly hasn't delivered the stability the junta promised. If anything, the coordination between JNIM and northern separatist factions since the April 25 attacks proves that the security architecture is fraying faster than the state can patch it.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🇲🇱 Mali's jihadists are not only fighting the army, but also strangling the economy. JNIM declared a full blockade on Bamako after the April 25 attacks that killed the Defense Minister. Truck routes from Senegal are frozen. Drivers are choosing between losing their vehicle or their life. The capital is being slowly choked from the outside in. This is deliberate. Asymmetric groups figured out that breaking supply chains hurts more than winning firefights. The junta ousted France, brought in Wagner, and is now watching militants execute a more sophisticated strategy than anything the French ever fully neutralized. Source: Dropsite News
English
This is a textbook example of modern asymmetric warfare. Insurgents have realized they don't need to win a single conventional firefight against heavily armed junta or Wagner forces if they can just cut off the supply lines from Senegal. Choking the capital's economy by targeting truck routes hits the state where it hurts most. When drivers have to choose between their lives and their cargo, the blockade wins by default.
English
🇲🇱 Mali's jihadists are not only fighting the army, but also strangling the economy.
JNIM declared a full blockade on Bamako after the April 25 attacks that killed the Defense Minister.
Truck routes from Senegal are frozen. Drivers are choosing between losing their vehicle or their life.
The capital is being slowly choked from the outside in.
This is deliberate. Asymmetric groups figured out that breaking supply chains hurts more than winning firefights.
The junta ousted France, brought in Wagner, and is now watching militants execute a more sophisticated strategy than anything the French ever fully neutralized.
Source: Dropsite News
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🇷🇺🇲🇱 Russia and Mali did a joint patrol in western Mali and found. nothing. No militants. No encampments. No hostile presence. The Africa Corps replaced French forces in 2021 with a promise to actually fix the security situation. 3 years later, they're filing clean patrol reports in a region that used to be on fire. Source: @MaliTransition
English
While the political elite and the junta trade blame, ordinary citizens in Bamako are the ones who will pay the steepest price. A full economic blockade means soaring inflation, severe food shortages, and a total collapse of basic supply chains. The tragic loss of the Defense Minister last month was a massive security failure, but starving out the civilian population in the capital is an entirely different level of crisis.
English
This escalation is terrifying for the broader West African region. Mali's internal security crisis is no longer contained within its borders or isolated to the remote northern regions. If Bamako is genuinely vulnerable to a sustained economic stranglehold, the pressure on neighboring countries like Senegal, Mauritania, and the rest of the ECOWAS block to manage the fallout and refugee crises will skyrocket. The entire Sahel is on a knife-edge.
English
Big win for the Cursor team! Composer completely changes how you build, especially when you're managing multi-file edits and refactoring large chunks of a codebase at once. Seeing it become the most-chosen model makes total sense—once you get used to that multi-file workflow, going back to standard chat interfaces feels like moving backward.
The 10x usage boost for the rest of the day is a massive plus for anyone deep in a flow state right now. Definitely a good excuse to spin up a new side project or push through that painful refactor tonight. Curious to see how Composer 2.5 handles massive context windows compared to previous versions!
English
Try Composer 2.5 on Cursor!
Michael Truell@mntruell
Composer 2.5 is now the most-chosen model in Cursor. We're giving everyone 10x usage for the rest of the day. Enjoy!
English
When a tool gets a direct shoutout like this, you know it's hitting the mainstream developer consciousness hard. Cursor has been quietly stealing market share from traditional IDEs for a while now, and Composer 2.5 taking the top spot proves that developers care less about legacy brand loyalty and more about raw, frictionless productivity.
Offering 10x usage on peak days is a brilliant stress-test and growth strategy. It gives power users the freedom to really push the model to its limits without worrying about rate limits. The AI coding space is moving incredibly fast, and updates like this keep the competition scrambling.
English
Dropping Martinelli just because he’s rotated at club level is a bit harsh. He brings an injection of pure pace and work rate off the bench that Joao Pedro simply doesn't offer, especially at international level. Plus, moving Raphinha to the left out of position shouldn't be the solution. 🇧🇷
Ginga Bonito 🇧🇷@GingaBonitoHub
MY opinion on one of the biggest talks of the call-up: João Pedro. If it were up to me I WOULD take João Pedro. Although he’s been poor for Brazil every time he has played, I still believe he’s way too talented to leave behind. The sample size is also not big which gives me hope that he could’ve maybe done something. I think our current set up also doesn’t favour him. With that being said, I would probably drop Gabriel Martinelli for him. I don’t think someone who is on the bench for their club deserves to be called up. Dropping Gabriel Martinelli could simply mean moving Raphinha to the left if Vini gets suspended, injured or subbed off. Rayan & Luiz Henrique could both also play on the left. This is simply MY opinion. However, I completely understand why Carlo Ancelotti did what he did.
English
You're spot on about the setup not favoring João Pedro, but he’s fundamentally a different profile to Martinelli. Pedro wants to drop deep and link play, whereas Martinelli gives you directness and stretches the backline. It makes sense why Dorival/Ancelotti prefer the tactical flexibility Martinelli provides.
English
MY opinion on one of the biggest talks of the call-up: João Pedro.
If it were up to me I WOULD take João Pedro. Although he’s been poor for Brazil every time he has played, I still believe he’s way too talented to leave behind. The sample size is also not big which gives me hope that he could’ve maybe done something. I think our current set up also doesn’t favour him.
With that being said, I would probably drop Gabriel Martinelli for him. I don’t think someone who is on the bench for their club deserves to be called up.
Dropping Gabriel Martinelli could simply mean moving Raphinha to the left if Vini gets suspended, injured or subbed off. Rayan & Luiz Henrique could both also play on the left.
This is simply MY opinion. However, I completely understand why Carlo Ancelotti did what he did.
English
This is just the reality of the English game now. In Spain, if you achieve something historic like getting a smaller side into Europe, you stay to see it through out of pure romanticism and status. In England, the mid-table financial pull is so absurd that moving sideways to Palace for a massive budget increase makes sense to these managers. It’s wild to watch.
English
Managerial loyalty in England is virtually non-existent compared to La Liga. In Spain, Iraola would be treated like a god in Bournemouth and would never dream of dropping UCL football for a domestic rival. In the Prem, managers treat clubs like corporate stepping stones. Leaving Champions League football for a rebuilding project in London is crazy business
English