Arul.eth

3.5K posts

Arul.eth banner
Arul.eth

Arul.eth

@Collector7NFT

web3 | BAYC | Mint.nft |Trading.crypto |167.eth| X.X

شامل ہوئے Temmuz 2023
3.2K فالونگ1.7K فالوورز
Arul.eth
Arul.eth@Collector7NFT·
@RickdotX mint.nft buy.nft agent.nft metaverse.nft x.nft punk.nft
Deutsch
2
0
3
31
Rick.x
Rick.x@RickdotX·
If .nft gets approved in the ICANN application round, the value single word domains will 🚀 #domains
English
4
0
7
201
Arul.eth
Arul.eth@Collector7NFT·
Nft season
Arul.eth tweet media
English
2
0
16
234
Captain GM
Captain GM@g13m·
Left or Right?
Captain GM tweet mediaCaptain GM tweet media
English
33
5
78
2.9K
Rafiq Nill
Rafiq Nill@rafiqnill·
Is Ape follow Ape still a thing?
Rafiq Nill tweet media
English
17
2
57
979
willVback
willVback@ventuwill·
Buying BAYC #6081 was the best decision so far and it has nothing to do with floor or ceiling price. Thank you @BoredApeYC @mfigge
willVback tweet media
English
6
4
80
867
Arul.eth ری ٹویٹ کیا
Adam Weitsman
Adam Weitsman@AdamWeitsman·
Thinking about having an impromptu IRL dinner at my place in NYC for any Apes/Meebits this Saturday. Let me know if you want to attend. No cost of course ….. @BoredApeYC @MeebitsNFTs
English
300
112
1.2K
39.7K
OpenSea
OpenSea@opensea·
gm five years ago today, an iconic collection minted out. @BoredApeYC - staying bored since 5/1/2021 🦧
English
305
372
2.1K
115.7K
Tony T
Tony T@haoxitong·
My first ape, it cost 77 ETH at the time.
Tony T tweet media
English
44
7
291
7.4K
JBond
JBond@jbondwagon·
Back in Nov 30, 2025, BAYC & Pudgy Penguins are valued around the same price Exactly 5 months later, BAYC is now valued 2x of a Pudgy Penguin What are your thoughts?
JBond tweet mediaJBond tweet media
English
47
7
121
6.9K
Arul.eth
Arul.eth@Collector7NFT·
@jbondwagon Holders are the builders .Hand overing complete IP rights to the permanent Azuki holders will benefit long term they spread across the whole they build the value using the IP same as apes
English
1
0
6
228
JBond
JBond@jbondwagon·
The main problem I see with Azuki rn is the lack of alignment between the brand & the holders To Azuki brand, being web3 is creating NFT & using the IP from this in TCG & manga To Azuki holders, being web3 is creating value for holding Azuki, & value is often seen as monetary At the moment, Azuki pushes holders’ IPs to new audiences via TCG. They feel like holders should be happy about this However, as Azuki makes push and sales of TCG using holders’ IPs, no money flow back to holders for the use of their IP Long-term, this approach may work IF Azuki becomes a global success, IPs in NFTs become more sought after But now, it’s a huge ask for holders to be ok with this set up while there’s no assurance that Azuki will be a successful IP This is the most visible disconnect. Obviously, it’s deeper than that but this paints a picture of the problem already
JBond tweet media
Zagabond@Zagabond

Some ppl think that Azuki isn't doing enough "web3" I think there’s a common misconception on what we're actually building. Azuki was built on the idea that the collectible characters belong to the holders. The NFTs are the 1st edition collectibles of this universe, the original characters of the Azuki IP. We care deeply about the art. It's why Azuki has consistently had sales well above floor for rare traits and aesthetics. Collectors are paying for what makes a specific character special. Today we're building the TCG to take those characters mainstream, followed by the official manga to turn the characters you own into a story millions will fall in love with. These characters started as PFPs. Today they’re used in trading cards played in tournaments. Soon they'll be in manga panels that people read on the train. They'll be loved by fans who've never owned an NFT. That IS web3. We're just doing it our way. The expectation is often that web3 means tokens are at the center of every product, fully onchain mechanics, experimentation at every layer, etc. That's a good fit for some projects. It's not what Azuki is. When we decided to build a TCG, there were holders adamant it should be digital and run on tokens. Despite gaming tokens mooning at the time, we chose otherwise. We knew that the facts were that 1. TCG players hate crypto. and 2. we have a goated team that has the ability to make a physical game that can compete with the best card games on the market. The right move was to build something players actually want and let the IP carry it. I'm glad that we stayed disciplined and made that call. That decision was specific to us given our team, our strengths, our constraints. Every team should lean into theirs. There is no single right way to do this. Going back to constraints for a sec bc it often gets overlooked... If your target audience hates crypto, why tf would you shove it in their face? Really think about that for a sec I've been very clear about what Azuki is and isn't. Read my pinned article. The NFTs are collectible characters and the original IP of the Azuki universe. The team is building a TCG and a manga from that IP. We work closely with the holders who've internalized this path, and that has been one of the most rewarding stretches of the journey. This path allows us to grow and proliferate the characters owned by holders with products that appeal to a mainstream audience. Some will disagree. I respect it. It doesn't change my mind. Azuki isn't built for everyone. It's built for the people who get it. If that's you, come join us. Azuki

English
45
0
113
12K