_E M E F A_
5.4K posts

_E M E F A_
@EmefaAnka
“Better a short pencil than a long memory” #bibliophile✨
TX شامل ہوئے Ağustos 2018
485 فالونگ775 فالوورز

I take my whole birthday week off 😊
𝗠𝘂𝗵𝗲𝗲 ♛@muheediva01
ADULTS OVER 30; do you take off work for your birthday , or do you think it’s childish?
English
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا

There was this joint at Madina Taxi Rank years ago. 😋
Seyram@__theSeyram
One of the best Brukina joints in Accra!!!
English
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا

Ma Joyce, Ghana’s problems did not start 8 years ago.
Since 1993, NDC and NPP have taken turns running this country. Between them they have governed Ghana for over 30 years.
NDC was in power. Ghana went to the IMF in 2015. NPP came in. Ghana went back to the IMF in 2023 with a $3 billion bailout after public debt hit over 90% of GDP.
NDC is back now.
Both parties have borrowed in our name. Both have watched public schools go without classrooms. Both have watched pregnant women walk miles for healthcare. Both have celebrated milestones that should embarrass them.
The problem with this government is the same problem with the last one. They act as if Ghana’s challenges only started when they were in opposition. We deserve better!
English
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا

Hi guys!
We started menstrual hygiene kits last year. This year, we’re going even bigger!
We’re supporting 500 girls with menstrual & personal hygiene kits & education.
You can support by retweeting, sharing or donating
0558588486 – Britney Tachie
gofund.me/44fe28b21
English
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا

The Greatest SDG7 Speech of All Time at a UN ECOSOC Youth Forum! 🔥🙌🏾
- presented by Worship Joshua Frimpong 🇬🇭
Listen to this. Absolutely brilliant!
Tocqueville@WorshipFrimpong
Respondent for Africa at the SDG 7 Session at the @UNDESA ECOSOC Youth Forum
English
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا

ORAL said $21 billion of state money was stolen.
More than a year later, not one person has been convicted.
But two NPP communicators made social media posts and the police acted the same day.
So it’s simple: The state moves fast when it’s critics, very slow when it’s people accused of stealing. 👍🏾
English
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا
_E M E F A_ ری ٹویٹ کیا

The illusion of “no choice” is, at its core, a failure of linguistic precision. When someone says “I had no choice,” what they genuinely mean is “I had no acceptable choice,” but acceptable is a subjective filter applied after the options already exist. A man who hands over his wallet at gunpoint still made a choice: surrender the wallet, resist, run, scream, negotiate. The gun did not physically remove his agency; it altered the cost structure of his options. The choices were always present on the table. What changed was the price attached to each one.
Conflating the weight of a consequence with the absence of a choice is not humility. It is intellectual imprecision dressed up as victimhood. Because choice is structural, not emotional. It exists as a logical condition the moment two or more possible actions are available to a conscious agent, and in virtually every human situation, at least two actions are available. The confusion arises because people unconsciously disqualify options that carry pain, risk, or social cost before they even consciously register them as options. A person trapped in a job they hate tells themselves they have no choice but to stay, yet quitting exists as a real, executable action. What they mean is that quitting carries consequences they are not willing to bear.
- That is a preference, not an absence of choice. The moment you call it a preference, you reclaim your agency, and with agency comes the far more honest and productive question: given all options, which consequences am I most willing to live with?
Cos consequences are the currency of choice, not the cancellation of it.
Every choice exists within a system of outcomes, and those outcomes exert gravitational pull on decisions, but gravity does not stop you from jumping; it only determines where you land. The severity of a consequence does not erase the decision. It amplifies it.
- The more severe the consequence, the more undeniable the choice becomes, because only a genuine act of will could move someone toward or away from such a high stakes outcome.
To say you had no choice in the face of hard consequences is to strip yourself of the very dignity that makes the decision meaningful.
Owning the choice, especially the costly ones, is not a burden. It is the foundation of moral and personal accountability.
English










