German Knight ✈️
6.3K posts
@GermaKnight
From Germany for Germany 🇩🇪💙🔥 Christianity prevails ✝️ Remigration ✈️ #WhiteLivesMatter 🥛 | Repost ≠ Endorsement
TRUMP LETS IT SLIP: He accidentally admitted he's been using nuclear weapons against Iran!!
@ApollHyperborea @ShivamHere_56 turks mog germans and it’s not even close
NEW - U.S. Vice President Vance on UFOs: "I don't think they're aliens, I think they're demons."
Germany, in my opinion, has two options if it doesn’t want to repeat a 1933 scenario in 2033: 1. Ban the AfD once and for all. 2. Or have the Union break the firewall, as moderates did in Sweden, for example, and force the far-right party to moderate itself and face the wear and tear of governing. By the way, to those who claim that tougher immigration policies curb the far right: Olaf Scholz’s liberal-left government saw the AfD rise by 10 points in four years during a worse economic situation. Friedrich Merz has increased it by 5 points in just one year, even talking about ‘problems with the urban landscape.’ And yet, there will still be people who think the solution is to become more racist...
Erklärung von Ulmens Anwälten! 1. Fernandes wurde in Spanien ihrerseits wegen Körperverletzung gegen ihren Mann festgenommen. 2. Beim spanischen Verfahren verweigert Fernandes die Kooperation ebenso wie damals beim deutschen.
By the way, every second statement by the US during this war involves nukes. Threatening their use, implying their use or pointing out that they're trying to stop Iran from obtaining them. Given Iran's surface appearance of restraint, what is the fear of nukes? Of course, it's below threshold and covert use of nuclear weapons, which are the ONLY MEANS by which modern warfare can be fought in the age of deep underground military bunkers and advanced fortifications.
Evidence for Tartus nuke (Dec 15 ’24, UTC) rests on 6 independent geophysical evidences (remote and local radiation, seismic waveform and amplitude, crater size, pressure damage). Every single one of these evidences are at variance with the unbased though widespread claim of a conventional explosive. Since more than a year, no single valid scientific argument has been presented against these evidences, despite unbased claims to the contrary. As some of these unbased claims are as unlikely to be correct as finding one particular atom in the entire Universe, yet find their way into absurdly "not even wrong" and misleading CN’s, here is a comprehensive rebuttal: 1) The observed radiation peak intensity in Cyprus (and Turkey) is in complete agreement with the quantitative predictions of a US DoD fallout model based on a 99.9% clean weapon [Housatonic ,1962] and a 0.3kt yield following independent from crater size *and* seismic data. 2) ) The unbased claim that observed radiation peaks are within “normal radiation levels”, blatantly ignores the fact in *all* 7 (!) Cyprus stations on Dec 16 ’24 are at 4-12 sigma above background. In addition, there are signals at 6 Turkish stations each with >7 sigma signals. The likelihood of all of these signals being random is much less than 1 in 10^52, or as absurdly unlikely as finding one particular atom in the whole of Earth. [Note that *one single* 5-sigma observation is sufficient for scientific discovery in Particle Physics, 2 sigma in Biology]. 3) There is a similar unbased claim that the Tartus GZ radiation readings were random. Instead of sending a team in Dec ’24, IAEA sponsored the DoD co-sponsored “GoodISIS” to produce an entirely flawed report containing above erroneous arguments. The readings of 6000nSv/h, finally performed after 3 months, exceeded those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after a shorter time. Observed Tartus GZ radiation levels *exceeded* the published background levels in Syria of 94 +/- 8 nSv/h by more than 700 sigma (!), The claim of a a random occurrence is even less likely to be correct than finding one particular atom in the entire Universe. And - last not least : 4) CTBTO Chief Rob Floyd has recently admitted that his organization is fundamentally unable to detect nukes with yield of <0.5kt ( that includes “dirty” ones). Thus CTBTO cannot detect the Tartus nuke of 0.3kt (B61-12 at lowest yield). Thus the claim that international agencies would have reported an event of the size of Tartus nuke is absurd and manifestly erroneous. In conclusion, every single one of these misleading claims attempting to refute the overwhelming evidence for Tartus nuke has been obliterated. ctbto.org/resources/for-…
TRUMP LETS IT SLIP: He accidentally admitted he's been using nuclear weapons against Iran!!
