Cruel Princess

@craigkellyAFEE Permanent residents shy not be entitled to any government subsidies or welfare, it should only go exclusively to citizens.

Unbelievable. We must vote out this treacherous Albanese regime.

@TFTC21 @DrJackKruse BTC is already dead - it’s just a zombie corpse for hodl- meanwhile Bitcoin has been upgraded with terranode 1 million tps - BSV

Every Bitcoiner thinks every attack vector has been covered. This one hasn't. "They are trying to slow the base layer down incrementally, just like chronic disease in biology. When you ossify the main chain, that's an extinction-level event." - @DrJackKruse

@SirToshiTV Who is the Bullshit artist?

Shitcoin'ers Talking Shit!!! 💩🤦‍♂️

@cryptorebel_SV @SirToshiTV Do they rabbit on about any other coin like this or is it just Craig Wright and BSV? …. If they don’t, then it’s very telling

According to BlockStream co-founder and Jeffrey Epstein associate Greg Maxwell AKA "nullc", the upcoming "Killing Satoshi" move about Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre is designed with the end goal of pumping #Bitcoin #BSV:

A CORRUPT, DISGUSTING STITCH-UP So now we know exactly why they deliberately waited to arrest Ben Roberts-Smith in Sydney. They didn’t want the trial in his home town in Brisbane, in front of jury his actual peers in Brisbane. They rigged it for Sydney because a Sydney jury is far more likely to be packed with Hamas & Hezbollah sympathisers and their leftist inner-city latte-sippers friends who carry a deep prejudicial hatred of our military. In short, they think they have a better chance of a guilty finding in Sydney than Brisbane - so they stitched it up so he’d be arrested in Sydney. And these "prosecutors" are in bed with Channel 9 — who have a massive commercial stake in seeing him destroyed. That’s why Nine’s cameras were conveniently parked at the airport like vultures, filming him being taken off the plane to create the impression that he was “at the airport trying to flee the country" because he’s guilty. Now almost every single juror dragged into that courtroom will have that prejudicial image burned into their brains. This is outright corruption. It stinks to high heaven. And these holier-than-thou, corrupt bastards have the absolute gall — the sheer stinking hide — to lecture their prosecution is all about “justice.”

I’m not a Developer can’t build a thing on block chain, but I completely understand the closing window of cash and the need to pivot to a new system. I teach people in the older demographic (GenX+) how to use a simple wallet, load it, spend it & escape the trad bank crab pot. The biggest movements always have homegrown beginnings. 🙏🏻please keep $imply€ash wallet updated & add AUD to Handcash .. TA

The thing I despise about this industry—blockchain broadly, not just BSV—is the creeping, incessant strain of economic illiteracy masquerading as virtue. Call it what it is: a kind of soft socialism dressed up as “community concern.” People sit there endlessly talking about what should have been done—with other people’s money. “If only they funded this.” “If only they spent on marketing.” “If only someone stepped in.” Not their money. Not their risk. Not their capital allocation. Always someone else. That is the tell. Because the moment you strip it down, what they are saying is: I am entitled to direct resources I did not earn, did not invest, and did not risk. No—you are not. You do not get to decide how someone else deploys their capital. Not in marketing. Not in infrastructure. Not in development. Not in anything. Capital allocation is not a committee exercise for spectators. It is a function of ownership and risk. From my perspective, it is very simple: If capital had been diverted into marketing years ago, perhaps the price would have been higher in the short term. And the system would not scale. If capital had been spent appeasing sentiment instead of building capability, you would have optics—and no substance. No throughput. No capacity. No foundation. So the trade-off was made. Deliberately. You can disagree with it. You can argue against it. That is fine. But this endless whining about what others “should have done” with their money is not argument—it is resentment. If you believe something different should exist, then fund it. Build it. Execute it. Otherwise, stop pretending that dissatisfaction entitles you to someone else’s capital. It doesn’t. Get over it.

@abomac3 You Lucky Bugger!

I purchased more $BSV today! 16.01 per coin!

I have spent nearly 14 years in this industry. I'm writing the real history. 18 articles. Primary sources. No shortcuts. This is Part 0: the three decades BEFORE the whitepaper: kurtwuckertjr.com/post/written-h…

Building ‘The supercar of blockchain’ was only possible with the right tools. Teranode was built for global adoption & support from AWS infrastructure allowed us to deploy & push the limits of throughput. Capable of holding the NY Stock Exchange on-chain, scalable dApps & a secure global data ledger.

Every time value crosses chains, something takes a cut. A spread. A fee. A delay. A risk premium. You’ve simply rebuilt the financial system—badly. And then called it innovation.

If you wanted systems to talk across those networks, you didn’t get simplicity. You got gateways. Protocol translators. Encapsulation layers. Routing bridges. Each one added cost, delay, fragility—and most importantly, control. The “multi-network world” wasn’t freedom. It was friction.

Why Adam Back, and Why Now For years, their safe answer was Hal Finney. Dead men don't deny. Coins don't move. It was convenient. Then in April 2026, the New York Times and John Carreyrou quietly dropped that safe script. They pointed at a living man, a talking man, a man who can deny it, and on top of that the CEO of #Blockstream. Not with cryptographic proof. With two spaces between sentences, British spellings, and hyphen habits. The piece landed right after the #BitcoinSV Chronicle activation. For years the line was "Bitcoin runs fine without its creator." Now, at the exact moment the creator's original protocol is being restored in code, the story flips to "we found the creator." That is a very loud coincidence. The "no Satoshi" narrative only works while Satoshi stays gone. The moment the original design walks back onto the field, that narrative expires. So a living stand-in becomes necessary. Someone who can deny. Someone controllable. Someone safely embedded inside the BTC camp. Look at what the article actually offered. Writing habits. Email exchanges. Citation style. Overlapping timelines. Cryptographic evidence: zero. Carreyrou went on the NYT Daily podcast and said he is "between 99.5% and 100%" certain. That is exactly the kind of evidence layer BSV people have been pointing to for years regarding Craig Wright, except the CSW record is thicker. Early technical writing. Forensic expertise. Philosophical alignment with Satoshi's own words. Steganographic traces. Research output predating the white paper. If linguistic fingerprints are now enough to clear the bar for Adam Back, Craig Wright is already well past that same bar. Regardless of the reporter's intent, the evidentiary threshold just came down, in public, on the record. Back denied it. Of course he did. The denial is part of the game. The real questions are simpler. Why now. Why right after Chronicle. And if writing habits count as proof, why does the same standard never get extended to Craig Wright? The bar came down. They lowered it themselves. #Bitcoin #BSV #Satoshi #CraigWright #BTC

People keep repeating the same tired complaint: “It’s a problem that Calvin is the only funder.” No. It isn’t. And the fact that this keeps being said shows a complete failure to understand both the situation and responsibility. First, the premise is wrong. He is not the only funder. He is the major funder. That distinction matters. Others exist—but they are smaller, quieter, and, notably, not the ones complaining. Second, the idea that he should somehow “relinquish control” betrays a deeper confusion. Control over what, exactly? Funding does not magically grant protocol control. And even if influence follows capital—as it does in every system ever created—the answer is not to demand that the person funding things withdraw. The answer is competition. If you believe the funding base is too concentrated, then expand it. Raise capital. Bring in new participants. Build something worth funding. Crowdsource if necessary. Structure it properly. Do the work. What you do not get to do is sit on the sidelines, contribute nothing, and complain that someone else has contributed too much. Funding is not assigned. It is earned, attracted, and built. If you dislike the current distribution, the solution is straightforward: change it. Not by rhetoric, not by complaint, but by action. Otherwise, what you are offering is not a critique. It is noise from people unwilling to do the one thing that would actually solve the problem.

Lightning Network can't compete. This is real peer-to-peer Bitcoin at its BEST - using layer one on Bitcoin. Satoshi had a poker game... BTC took it off, would be proud of this transaction. Direct from Handcash.io to Lilbet.com : Casino, Sports-book & Prediction Market. Fraction-of-a-cent fees. Instant. Fully verifiable. Show me anything close on Lightning. #Bitcoin #BSV #Layer1 #Casino #Sportsbook #PredictionMarket #Handcash #P2P

@SmilaZParadis Disappointing isn’t it, not many genuine people left.

How is it that #BSV'ers still support a liar? He's using Dr Craig Wright's name! Haven't you all had enough of that sort of thing and all such garbage!? I want you all to see this, so that you know the truth of what you are supporting, when you support Gavin Mehl. Sadly! I did adress what you see here, and instead of deleting the post, he keeps commenting on it, so that it keeps re-apearing in news feed. So, now it's not some sort of Oops that could be explained away! His statement is a straight up lie. There is No co-authoring with CSW! Gavin Mehl obviously thinks that you all just fall for everything he says. = holding you all for stupid. I want to prevent that you unknowingly end up trusting this person at some point; @bsvblockchain @BSVTeranode @CsTominaga

@rosscoulthart @nytimes Seriously Ross? Just when I started to believe some of your alien tripe, you do this? You just lost your credibility.

Is one of tech's greatest mysteries finally solved? Is the person who calls himself Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of Bitcoin, a 55yo Brit called Adam Back? This is an insightful story from @nytimes: nytimes.com/2026/04/08/bus…

@financeguy74 And yet here is BSV doing over 1 million tps & building web 3 with Craig Wrights version of Bitcoin as described in the white paper. Jack Dorsey is just a fool who got lucky struck it rich with Twitter and somehow you idiots think he is a genius.

"If Dr Wright were not Satoshi, the real Satoshi would have been expected to come forward to counter the claim." Jack Dorsey came forward to counter the claim and paid for the lawsuit that permanently ended CSW's assertions.

Keep Reposting untill the masses are with us?

Until we turn from the fiat currencies the criminal-pedo class use to pay for war and all they enjoy doing, nothing changes. #bsv

@CluelessScot81 @thecoastguy Your a clueless idiot! 7tps is not a world currency and lightning is a method for criminals to trade.

@thecoastguy Agreed, however.. I think you meant #btc! below is performance of bsv in bitcoin since 2019