Jude L

GBN and Miriam Cates. Reform don't actually have to do anything.

In 48 hours the Government has gone from "we'll bring forward legislation to proscribe the IRGC as soon as possible" to "we keep it under review." If @Keir_Starmer was serious about "antisemitism having no place in Britain", he'd proscribe the IRGC as promised in his manifesto.

@SlyForTheRight He actually said that if they were here, not working, not speaking English or living in social housing then they should not be here. Anyone who was here and making a net contribution was welcome to stay. I agree with that.

🚨LOOK HOW RUPERT BLEW IT 🤦🏽‍♂️ Rupert Lowe had a real shot — common-sense, no-nonsense ideas people actually backed: speak English in the NHS, deport illegal immigrants, work if you can, put Britain first, stay out of pointless wars. Solid. Popular. WINNING territory. Then somehow… he swerved. From practical policy to “millions must go” — including people here legally. And suddenly it’s not about solutions anymore, it’s noise, rage, and amplification from the usual ethnonationalist echo chamber. Here’s the irony: plenty of ethnic minority conservatives AGREED with his original policies. But now? They’re being abused and told they’ll be “next out” too. That’s not strategy — that’s self-sabotage. Britain has moved on. Voters want order, fairness, and realism — not grievance politics dressed up as patriotism. Prediction time: Restore Britain crashes at the local elections (~10% at best), 1 seat at the General Election, and ends up just another UKIP -style protest act — loud, chaotic, and going nowhere.

And from the French. They colonised us for three centuries ! That's got to be worth a few baguettes

It’s almost as if McSweeney deliberately misleading the police call handler to sow confusion. Says Belgrave Street, not Road. When call handler thinks it’s Belgrave Street in the East End and mentions Stepney, McSweeney does not correct the handler. Indeed he then confirms the thief turning at Stepney Green Park when the handler mentions that — knowing full well that couldn’t be true.

🚨DERANGED: RAF Illegally BLOCKED 160+ White Male Pilots to Boost Diversity — MoD Confirms “This is one of the craziest decisions ever made by any branch of the British state ever!” The RAF literally paused hiring white men, preferring to recruit NO ONE over a qualified white male pilot, all to hit woke diversity quotas for women & ethnic minorities. A senior female recruitment officer resigned in protest, calling it illegal & immoral. MoD inquiry confirmed: it WAS unlawful positive discrimination. Over 160 male pilots had training suspended. 31 got compensation. This is deranged. Putting ideology before competence doesn’t make our military stronger, it puts national security at risk.

Everything Cabinet Minister Reed says is in this interview is untrue. Everything.

Hiding behind process like this is pathetic. You are the Prime Minister. If Ed Miliband is blocking you, get rid of him.

This is beyond a joke. People are losing their lives because of endless doctors’ strikes. Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting have got to get a grip. Ban doctors’ strikes, just as strikes are banned in other vital public services.

The only leader that seems to care. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is the prime minister we need.

I’ve raised Jonathan Powell’s secret visits to China more than once… When we must rely on Beijing for transparency about our own Government’s actions, something has gone profoundly wrong.

Lammy says his attack on jury trials is needed for efficiency. Today Sir Brian Leveson blew that excuse apart. Labour are attacking this ancient English right for ideological reasons. We will fight them every step of the way.

🚨And there you have it. Lindsay Hoyle misled the house by omitting the fact that he has the power to pause proceedings and ask the prime minister to answer the question. He was quite happy to do this with Boris, but he REFUSES to do it with Keir Starmer. Absolute disgrace.

Why is it called the National Trust, when there's an embarrassment about the nation that the Trust is supposedly representing

The Slave Trade Reparations Trap Is Already Set On Tuesday, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution demanding that Britain and other former colonial powers enter into "good-faith dialogue on reparatory justice" for the transatlantic slave trade. It passed 124 to three. Britain abstained. The government called this a principled stand. James Kariuki, Britain's chargé d'affaires at the UN, said the UK "continues to disagree with fundamental propositions of the text." Strong words. The problem is that this government has already demonstrated, in precise detail, exactly how much those words are worth. The man who championed this cause from the backbenches is now Deputy Prime Minister. In 2018, Lammy told Parliament he wanted not just an apology but reparations. In 2020, he said the process of "repairing" Britain's colonial past was "obviously financial." He is now the second most powerful figure in the government. Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, said that same year that there was "a moral and legal" case for compensation. These are not old positions they have repudiated. They are positions they have declined to retract. The African Union's legal strategy is no secret. Their experts plan to seek an ICJ advisory opinion establishing reparations as a matter of international obligation. They chose this route because it worked. A previous ICJ opinion on Chagos prompted Starmer to hand over £30 billion of British sovereign territory rather than "break international law." The reparations movement noted the outcome. Tuesday's resolution is the first brick in the same foundation. The abstention is not a defence. It is a waiting room. Look at who voted in favour. China. Iran. Russia. India. This is the moral coalition that has appointed itself arbiter of Britain's historical guilt. China, which runs the largest forced labour system currently operating on earth. Iran, whose government funds proxy militias and whose record on human rights requires no elaboration. Russia, prosecuting a war of territorial conquest in Europe. These governments did not vote yes because they have thought seriously about Atlantic slavery. They voted yes because a financially and legally weakened Britain serves their interests, and because Western self-flagellation is a gift that keeps giving. The resolution contains a revealing admission. Its supporters openly ranked the transatlantic trade as more grave than the Arab slave trade, which ran for 1,300 years and took millions of Africans across the Sahara and Indian Ocean. The reason given: scale and duration. By that measure, the Arab trade should face equal scrutiny. It does not. The resolution targets Western nations and leaves others untouched. Some historical criminals are in the dock. Others helped write the charges. The US representative said so plainly. He rejected the idea of ranking atrocities by political convenience and accused the resolution's backers of using history as a weapon. Only the United States, Israel, and Argentina voted against. Britain could not manage even that. There is a pattern here that is no longer possible to mistake for coincidence. Gibraltar. Chagos. And now this. Each time, the same sequence: international legal pressure applied, ministers express disagreement, then Britain writes the cheque. Starmer did not create the reparations movement. But he handed it its proof of concept. The arguments against reparations are well-rehearsed and decisive. The question is whether a government containing David Lammy and Lord Hermer has the will to make them. When the ICJ opinion arrives, and the Foreign Office begins its familiar audit of what international law requires, that question will answer itself. "The arguments against reparations are well-rehearsed and decisive. The question is whether a government containing David Lammy and Lord Hermer has the will to make them."

Twice now you have “quoted” the Tory leader saying “she said ‘she wanted to go to war’” - that is a flat out lie. Deployed I might add to avoid answering anything you are actually asked. That’s not leadership Prime Minister that’s cowardice

The grooming gang court transcripts changed the debate - so Labour will obviously vote to make it harder to get them

Gosh!

I remember the good old days when the National Trust wasn’t about anti-white social engineering.

Superb from @TomTugendhat and so obviously right. Who are they governing for because it doesn’t feel they’re there for us…