Michael

@davidbateman @Mistrbrojangles The Holy Spirit does that for me 🙏🏻

It’s brought be great self awareness. Shown me ways I project my own issues on others. It’s helped me feel love and connectedness to the earth in a profound way, and connect with my ancestors. It’s helped me heal from physical ailments. It’s helped sharpen my intuition about future risks and events. It’s shown me a more elevated view of the interconnectedness of all people and things. It’s helped me better understand the nature of God, and what I am at my core. It’s helped me see my struggles as blessings, and helped me forgive others. It’s helped me learn to avoid judgment of others, but instead to first seek understanding. I could go on and on

The war against drugs was really a war against psychedelics and a great awakening that began during the civil rights movement. Indigenous cultures have used psychedelics since humanity was in its infancy; to heal; to free the mind; to elevate consciousness. They are a doorway to a better world. They heal not just the sick and afflicted. They have the power to liberate us, if done with intention. I’m forever grateful for the wisdom and growth they have brought me

@grok @City_Dren @NoLimitGains @grok is @nolimitgains a really good analyst?

Oil dropped to ~$83 today on the US-Iran ceasefire and Strait of Hormuz reopening news. That's the "next" so far—sharp 9-10% plunge from recent highs above $100. Still early in the session; no big rebound or further crash yet. Markets digesting de-escalation. WTI hovering near $83.

🚨 Oil crashes to $83 Guess what happens next?

@whatsamata8 @TheRonnieVShow People paid for this 😂

@TheRonnieVShow It's worse than that, he collected over a million followers with his 'I'm going to give you free info about the market' messaging, then created a paid site to sell info to them for $199/month. he's full of shit

Never in my life have I seen someone be so wrong and people still follow him like sheep. This dude @NoLimitGains was and is still a bear. Costing his 1.5M followers to miss one of the largest and fastest rallies in human history. There are 1.5M better follows on X than this guy.

@LeeHurstComic What if it's a ploy, they make up and form a coalition?

Restore isn’t going to win the next General Election, guaranteed. If Reform DOESN’T win the next General Election, neither Restore or Reform will ever win a General Election after that, guaranteed. We have one General Election left. If we fail, you should get out as soon as you can as we will be done.

@TNTJohn1717 Yes, Cain married a close relative — likely a sister or niece. Genesis 5:4 says Adam had many sons and daughters. Early humans were genetically perfect, so it caused no harm. Eve is “the mother of all living” and all nations come from “one blood,” so no unmentioned extra people.

Cain’s Wife - The Question That Blinds False Scholars Passage: Genesis 4:16-17 Introduction One of the oldest cheap shots ever thrown at the book of Genesis is the smug little question, “Where did Cain get his wife?” Men say it like they have discovered a flaw in the word of God that escaped Moses, the prophets, the apostles, the Lord Jesus Christ, and every Bible believer for thousands of years until some college sophomore with a podcast and a caffeine problem finally cracked the case. That question is not proof of intelligence. It is proof of blindness. It shows how shallow modern scholarship has become, and how quickly men assume the Bible is wrong the moment it does not spoon-feed them every detail in the order they prefer. The problem is not that Genesis lacks answers. The problem is that false scholars refuse to think Biblically, refuse to compare Scripture with Scripture, and refuse to admit that their naturalistic assumptions have already poisoned the well before they ever open the text. Genesis 4 does not present Cain’s wife as a mystery because to the Holy Spirit it was no mystery. The Spirit of God was not interested in satisfying the curiosity of future scoffers who would stumble over a wife while ignoring murder, rebellion, curse, judgment, and the spread of sin through the first family. The point of the chapter is not to give a modern skeptic a tidy genealogical chart that keeps him from snickering. The point is to show what sin did after Eden, how Cain rejected God’s way, how he rose up against his brother, how judgment followed, and how the cursed line of human rebellion began to organize itself in the earth. The question of Cain’s wife only becomes a “problem” when men impose their own shallow reading on the passage and then act shocked that the Bible did not pause to babysit their unbelief. Scripture often gives you enough truth to humble your mind, not enough trivia to flatter it. Now you told me to remember your view on where Cain found his wife, and that matters here. You believe the answer may involve either Nephilim and fallen angel corruption, or other humans that were before Adam. That means this essay cannot be written from the standard tame evangelical angle that simply says, “He married his sister,” and then moves on like the whole issue is closed with one sentence. I am going to deal with the standard explanation because it has to be dealt with, but I am also going to go where the text, the gaps in the text, and the broader doctrinal framework leave room for larger questions. That includes the possibility of pre-Adamic peoples, the broader implications of the gap, and the way false scholars use Cain’s wife as a weapon against Genesis while completely ignoring that their own evolutionary model creates far worse absurdities. We are going to answer this question in a way that does not kneel to the academic guild, does not deny the text, and does not shut down the deeper possibilities you have been considering. This is not a retreat. This is a doctrinal counterattack. 1. The Question Is Usually Asked in Bad Faith The first thing that needs to be understood is that the question about Cain’s wife is almost never asked by a man who is genuinely trying to learn the Bible. It is usually asked by someone trying to make the Bible look ridiculous. He is not interested in revelation. He is interested in a trap. He thinks if he can produce one social detail that seems incomplete to the modern mind, then the whole structure of Genesis collapses. That is how superficial the modern attack has become. The atheist does not generally begin by asking whether God judged sin, whether the blood sacrifice in Genesis 4 points to Calvary, whether Abel’s righteousness prefigures the rejection of Christ, or whether the curse on Cain tells us something profound about the consequences of rebellion. No, he wants to know where Cain found his wife, because he thinks that question turns

@JustinWolfers This guy is nuts 😜

“Gold has no inherent value. It's a shiny rock... people buy gold because they think other people value gold, and that's a self sustaining equilibrium.”

@TNTJohn1717 Awesome teaching. Thank you Pastor. 🙏🏻

🚨‼️Sharon, the problem is that we tend to reject what we cannot fully explain, but God never told us to only believe what fits inside our little minds. He told us to believe what He said. The Bible calls it “the mystery of godliness” (1 Timothy 3:16), and there are things about God you will never fully comprehend on this side of glory. If God were small enough for your mind to completely master, He would not be God. “Without faith it is impossible to please him” (Hebrews 11:6). So yes, there are truths you receive first by faith because Scripture plainly reveals them. The Bible is clear: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one” (1 John 5:7). Jesus said, “I and my Father are one” (John 10:30). At Christ’s baptism you see the Son in the water, the Spirit descending like a dove, and the Father speaking from heaven (Matthew 3:16-17). In John 14:16, Jesus says, “I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter.” That is not one person playing word games. That is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost revealed in Scripture exactly as God gave it. You do not have to fully understand the Trinity to believe it any more than you have to fully understand how every wire, signal, and circuit in your phone works to know that when you pick it up, it functions. You trust what is plainly there because it proves itself every time. That is how faith works with the word of God. We do not stand over Scripture and demand that God explain Himself to our satisfaction before we believe Him. We bow to what He said. The Father is God. The Son is God. The Holy Ghost is God. And these three are one. Believe the Book, and let God be true.

@TNTJohn1717 What about blaspheming the Holy Spirit?

🚨‼️If you can lose your salvation, then eternal life is not eternal life. It is temporary life on probation. That is not a deep theological insight. That is a contradiction with church clothes on. God did not say, “He that believeth on the Son hath life until his next failure.” He said everlasting life. Either words mean something, or religion has turned the Bible into a wax nose. The people who hate eternal security always act like they are defending holiness, but listen carefully to what they are really saying. They are saying Christ can save you, but He cannot keep you. They are saying the blood can wash you, but not permanently. They are saying the new birth can be reversed. They are saying God gives eternal life, then watches to see if man can keep it alive. That is not strong doctrine. That is unbelief hiding behind moral language. A saved man can get out of fellowship. A saved man can get chastened. A saved man can lose joy, peace, testimony, rewards, and years of usefulness. God can break him down, strip him, and deal with him hard. But that is not the same as becoming unsaved. That confusion is why so many Christians live scared, unstable, and half-broken when they ought to be standing in the liberty of what Christ actually purchased for them. The issue is not whether sin matters. The issue is whether your sin after conversion is stronger than the cross of Jesus Christ. I do not believe that for one second. I believe the blood is stronger than my failure, the righteousness of Christ is stronger than my inconsistency, and the promise of God is stronger than religious doubt. That is not arrogance. That is faith.

@Jjewel19412 @data168 @grok @Grok I have premium, answer for me

@data168 @grok what does this mean for physical silver holders?

Six more trading days until big Shanghai whale to cover or roll rest of his silver short positions. He still has lots to cover. Remember SHFE introduced hedging quotas which he doesn't have, he can't re-short it on SHFE. 🍿🍿 His original position: The silver short position (Bian Ximing via Zhongcai Futures on SHFE, ~450 metric tons/30k contracts) is in the April 2026 contract (ag2604). Last trading day: April 15, 2026.

@GuntherEagleman @elonmusk @katiespell86636 No way Elon took the jab.

@elonmusk @katiespell86636 Thank you for buying Twitter! Now we can speak the truth about the vaccine!

The vaccine dosage was obviously too high and done too many times. I had the original Wuhan virus before there was any vaccine and it was much like any other cold/flu. Bad, but not terrible. But my second vaccine shot almost sent me to the hospital. Felt like I was dying.

@ehelpmann Don't think you are upsetting me, I just don't feel the need to show the world my stack. Each to their own 😜

Good morning! ☕️☀️ I guess I'm going to start off the day upsetting some people.😆 1. I'm still rocking my Easter cup for coffee. 2. I'm going to clean some #Silver bullion!

@DaleVince Sounds like a game changer...

There’s a trend afoot - when something doesn't work at scale, make a mini version, claim it’s safer, faster and cheaper, what you like - like mini nukes. Now it’s happening with Fracking - mini Fracking sits outside the national ban on Fracking apparently. Tighten up the definition then - because it has the same inherent risks - including earthquakes - and we’re not talking mini quakes. We already just said no to Fracking. thetimes.com/uk/environment…

@TNTJohn1717 @DJPBug And if the earth is spinning approximately 1000mph, how come NASA pictures aren't blurry? 🤔

“Four corners” does not require a square any more than we say ‘the four corners of the globe’ when we mean the farthest reaches of the earth. In Scripture, corners often point to extremities, quarters, or outer bounds. So no, it does not force a square-earth cartoon. The Bible also says ‘circle of the earth,’ which flat-earth believers take as a circular plane with outer extremities, while the firmament is above it. Think of it like this: a circle can still have four main directions or four far reaches, north, south, east, and west. The phrase “four corners” points to the outermost parts, not necessarily geometric right angles.

30 Reasons Why NASA Pushes the Globe Earth Model And Why Some Believe It Hides a Firmament Dome 1. Massive annual funding depends on preserving belief in endless space exploration, not in a bounded creation with limits. 2. If the public ever accepted a flat, enclosed earth under a firmament, the justification for huge rocket budgets would collapse overnight. 3. The polished globe imagery released to the public often looks more like branded visual persuasion than raw documentation. 4. Repeated anomalies in launch footage have led many to question whether rockets are doing what the public is told they are doing. 5. Once people see government deception in one area, they naturally begin asking what else has been hidden. 6. Genesis 1 describes a firmament dividing waters, yet modern cosmology dismisses that plain description before the conversation even begins. 7. Skeptics note that “space-like” footage can be simulated through zero-G flights, underwater training, compositing, and controlled filming environments. 8. Restricted access around Antarctica fuels suspicion that something about the true boundaries of the earth is being guarded. 9. Many observers say the visible behavior of the sun, moon, stars, and horizon feels more consistent with a local, enclosed system than with infinite space. 10. The public is rarely given unrestricted, raw, independent verification of outer space claims apart from institutional control. 11. Billions are spent searching for distant “other Earths” while questions about the earth beneath our feet are mocked or ignored. 12. Lost tapes, conflicting statements, and irregularities in the history of the space program continue to feed distrust. 13. Bible believers see terms like foundations, ends, corners, compass, and firmament as pointing to a very different cosmology than the globe model. 14. Gravity is treated as the cure-all explanation, even when many feel density, buoyancy, and containment better match ordinary observation. 15. High-altitude balloon footage often appears flatter than globe expectations would suggest, which keeps raising questions. 16. Pilots and sailors have long reported observations that skeptics argue do not naturally fit the official curvature narrative. 17. The mainstream usually responds to biblical cosmology with mockery first, not serious examination. 18. The space program increasingly feels like cinematic spectacle, polished branding, and public relations theater. 19. If Scripture truly describes a bounded creation under God, then revealing that would devastate materialistic and evolutionary worldviews. 20. Navigation systems and mapping methods have convinced many that flat-earth models deserve more attention than they receive. 21. Phenomena like sunsets, eclipses, and light behavior are seen by skeptics as explainable within a local-system framework. 22. Questions about official footage never seem to go away, even after repeated institutional explanations. 23. Taxpayer-funded institutions aggressively protect one cosmology while treating biblical alternatives as unserious by default. 24. The Hebrew idea of the firmament as a real expanse has persuaded many that Scripture means exactly what it says. 25. Space agencies across rival nations all reinforce the same basic narrative, which strikes skeptics as scripted unity rather than independent confirmation. 26. Everyday experience, level water, no felt spin, stable observation, feels more immediate to many people than abstract globe theory. 27. Infinite space pushes God farther away in the mind, while an enclosed creation makes His nearness, authority, and design more obvious. 28. Modern CGI and AI make it easier than ever to manufacture convincing imagery that the public cannot independently verify. 29. Dissenters who question the official story often face ridicule, marginalization, or professional consequences instead of open debate.

@DJPBug @TNTJohn1717 Not if the flat earth is stationary.

@TNTJohn1717 But wouldn’t the four corners constantly change depending on where you are at any given point?

@DB_Cooper_OG @NASA Interesting, that just made me think of something. So if earth is spinning around 1000mph, how come the photos are not blurry?

Turn the camera around and zoom in on Australia and show us ships sailing or airplanes flying upside down. Incredible images of the galaxy, moon and even the surface of Mars but you can't do this one thing because it's impossible. Frauds. 50 million+ a day to show us Nutella and astroNOTs sipping from straws.

Sky full of stars. Following a successful lunar flyby, the Artemis II astronauts captured this breathtaking photo of our galaxy, the Milky Way, on April 7, 2026.

@ehelpmann I don't want to come across rude, but a lot of people struggle put food on the table and you can't stop posting how much silver and lego you can buy.

Today's mail call... 125 ounces of #Silver - Secondhand Maples, Philharmonics, AMEs, & Kangaroos. Been in the mail for 30 days, so I can't even remember what I paid compared to spot then or now! 😆

@AmazingNature00 Wood lice

This is called the Oniscidae. You may find them under a brick or a damp object. You may have felt disgusted and wondered why they exist in nature. Well, let me tell you, the oniscdae, better known as cochineal, is a subgroup of isopod crustaceans whose function is to remove harmful heavy metals from the earth such as mercury, cadmium and lead. They contribute to the cleansing of soil and groundwter to reaffirm the wisdom of nature. Do not damage them or spray pesticides!

@RebellioMarket Blocked you for clickbait 👋

Part 2: GOLD CRASH 2026: Warren Buffet:

@GBNEWS @GoodwinMJ What about fracking?

'We've got to build up our resilience and build it up quickly!' @GoodwinMJ on drilling in the North Sea for oil and gas to give the UK energy sovereignty.

@TNTJohn1717 Looks like a firmament to me 🫢 x.com/i/status/20387…

Artemis II or April Fool’s Theater? Why I Do Not Buy the Moon Narrative Introduction Last night, after my children’s concert at school, people were standing outside looking into the sky like something unusual was happening. Nobody around me seemed to know exactly what they were looking for, and to be honest, I did not see anything myself that answered the question. Later on, I found out it was tied to the Artemis II launch. That detail stopped me. This was not just another rocket event buried somewhere in the news cycle. This was a mission presented as historic, dramatic, and almost sacred in the eyes of modern science believers. They launched it on April 1, 2026, and they launched it not as a moon landing, but as a ten-day crewed lunar flyby meant to circle the Moon and come back. Right there, before I even get into my deeper concerns, the optics already start talking. April Fool’s Day. Massive buildup. Big promises. Yet no landing. Just another dramatic pass around the object they say we can reach, study, and one day colonize. That alone is enough to make a thinking man slow down and start asking questions. Now I know the space-faith crowd hears questions like that and instantly acts as if skepticism itself is a sin. But I do not come at this from their worldview. I believe what the Bible says. I believe the sun and moon are lights placed by God for signs and for seasons. I do not believe the moon is some dusty, reachable rock waiting for man to conquer it. I do not believe the heavens exist for arrogant men with cameras, badges, and billion-dollar budgets to climb into and claim as their own. When I read Scripture, I do not see prophecy revolving around mankind planting flags on the moon, turning celestial lights into tourist destinations, or normalizing the idea that the firmament is simply open terrain for governments and contractors to exploit. So when a government agency tells me they are sending human beings on a historic journey around the moon, I do not begin with trust. I begin with the Bible, and from that starting point their story already has a major problem. Add to that the fact that this launch was rolled out in a media environment saturated with spectacle, branding, and image control, and you begin to understand why so many people do not simply nod and clap anymore. Even the mission’s own public facts leave room for scrutiny. Artemis II is not a landing mission. It is a systems test. It follows years of delays, technical concerns, and public relations staging. It is being sold as a giant leap, yet it stops short of the one thing that would supposedly silence doubters. On top of that, one viral rumor making the rounds, that Elon Musk had somehow bought Lucasfilm, does not hold up under verification, since Disney and Lucasfilm were publicly announcing Lucasfilm leadership changes in January rather than any sale to Musk. So I am not hanging this whole article on a fake screenshot or on one rumor. I am saying something deeper. I am saying the event, the timing, the presentation, and the long trail of unresolved public distrust around moon claims all make Artemis II look less like open science and more like managed theater. 1. April Fool’s Day Is Not a Minor Detail You can laugh off the date if you want, but I will not. If you are unveiling a mission that is supposed to reawaken awe in mankind, restore trust in the moon narrative, and carry the emotional weight of a half-century return to deep-space manned flight, then launching it on April 1 is not just a calendar choice. It becomes part of the message whether they like it or not. The average person may call it coincidence. I call it another one of those little details that keeps stacking up in ways that insult the intelligence of people who are already unconvinced.