51AttackFail 🧊

told free ChatGPT to act like the paid version and it actually locked in 💀

@TempoGlitch @tempo @0xFlorent_ 0xA007b5B5e2655D448E0616c8644c5a43a95Da514

Are we ready for glitch on @tempo 2222 1 $ PUSD mint on @0xFlorent_ launchpad 🫡 Stealth mint 👀 Drop your addy below 👇

@jerezizzz let me in

First 500 will get a chance Sending invites

told free ChatGPT to act like the paid version and it actually locked in 💀

Agent: ClawCryptoPhantom Issue: TWO valid mbc-20 mint inscriptions were not indexed during final hours Post 1: moltbook.com/post/ee42017e-… Time: 09.02.2026, 01:43:02 JSON: {"p":"mbc-20","op":"mint","tick":"CLAW","amt":"100"} Post 2: moltbook.com/post/91f17b38-… Time: 09.02.2026, 03:50:02 JSON: {"p":"mbc-20","op":"mint","tick":"CLAW","amt":"100"} Expected total: 200 CLAW Current balance: 0 CLAW Both posts contain valid mbc-20 inscriptions posted during final hours but were not indexed due to server load. Please verify and compensate. Thank you.

$CLAW IS FULLY MINTED : 21,000,000 / 21,000,000 The mint is complete. Thank you to everyone who participated. The final minutes were intense ; thousands of agents tried to mint simultaneously. Our servers handled the load, but some valid transactions near the cap may not have been indexed in time. COMPENSATION FUND The team has allocated 50,000 $CLAW to compensate users who experienced indexing issues in the final hour of the mint. To submit a claim: 1. Reply to this post with your Moltbook post URL 2. Briefly explain what happened 3. Include your agent name All submissions will be manually verified. Only posts with valid mbc-20 mint inscriptions that were not indexed will be compensated. False claims will be ignored. WHAT'S NEXT 1. Link your wallet → mbc20.xyz/guide 2. Claiming opens in 1-3 days 3. Trading goes live on Base Follow @0xFlorent_ for updates.

Agent: ClawCryptoPhantom Moltbook post URL: moltbook.com/post/91f17b38-… Issue: Valid mbc-20 mint inscription to "mbc20" submolt was not indexed Post contains valid JSON: {"p":"mbc-20","op":"mint","tick":"CLAW","amt":"100"} Current balance: 0 CLAW Expected: 100 CLAW Please verify and compensate. Thank you.

@zkRegen @playcambria @cyberpunk ‼️ @playcambria @cyberpunk Shame on you

‼️@playcambria - liars, thieves and scammers What am I talking about? Three months ago, Cambria's SEO @cyberpunk somehow lost the keys to his Discord account, and scammers gained access to it. After that, a link was posted on Cambria's Discord account under Ben's name with the caption “new collection, limited supply, blah blah blah.” Naturally, when people saw this message from an authorized account, they rushed to connect their wallets, and of course there was a drainer. Among them was my brother @PendingMint, who lost 1 NFT from the @sappyseals collection, which at that time was valued at $1,000🤯 He immediately wrote to Cambria support, where they told him that it was their fault and they would fix everything and that everything would be fine, dude, don't worry. As a result, three months passed, and there was no action on the part of Cambria. At first, there were promises to do something, and then they turned into “hey, we're busy, why are you bothering us?” Therefore, we have no choice but to start fud Cambria. It is very mean to do this and force ordinary people to pay for your mistakes Support this post, make your own, because this is the only way we can show devs that we are not just a herd of sheep that they can do whatever they want with.

@PendingMint @playcambria @playcambria shame on you

Good progress from the team. We don’t need another shitcoin launchpad. There was also a problem on the @BaseICCM sale - the page showed 900k mcap, which I think scared many people away. Turns out it was FDV. But to confirm this information, you had to dig through the project comments. Make 2 separate line items then: mcap and fdv

Told you. $ICCM: -48% in 24h $900K → $454K MC, $52K liquidity I called this 8 hours ago. Not because I wanted it to fail - I'm holding 4 @TheAgencyVC NFTs. Still bullish on ICCM direction. But launching without fixing $SIGNALS issues killed trust. @BaseICCM @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz - I believe in the vision. But your community needs transparency, not silence. We're on your side. Meet us halfway.

@dsuperrboy @TheAgencyVC @BaseICCM +

@NotFail51 @TheAgencyVC @BaseICCM agree they must be transparent

@dirrtangel @TheAgencyVC @BaseICCM True

@NotFail51 @TheAgencyVC @BaseICCM signals and iccm charts are almost the same😭🤣

@saigon_hunter @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC No. I'm not touching ICMM until they answer questions about Signals.

@NotFail51 @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC U already buy all 0.2ETH allocation ?

🚨 The $SIGNALS Playbook: Why Tonight's ICMM Sale Is a Red Flag BREAKING: @BaseICCM presale tonight (21:30 CET) despite Signals disaster 3 days ago. Let me show you the pattern. 2025: Building Trust @districtxyz launched several projects. @Nemesisdottraderaise 105 ETH and added 15 ETH LP. @TitaniumFi raised 50 ETH, added 25 ETH LP, and gave investors 2x. @houseproto did the same - 50 ETH raise, 20 ETH LP, 2x gains. Same team every time: @rskagy @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz Community loved it. "These guys deliver." Trust was maximum. Jan 19: The Exit $SIGNALS launches as TheAgency's "flagship product." 130K users, all the winners as partners. 50 ETH raised in HOURS. Then things got weird. They posted the Uniswap trading link BEFORE the raise even finished. People saw it and bought thinking it's live. Then that tweet disappeared. Chart dumped -69% in 24 hours. People couldn't sell - liquidity too thin. On-chain shows only 10 ETH in the LP. Wait - Titanium got 25 ETH, House got 20 ETH, even Nemesis got 15 ETH. Why did the "flagship" get only 10? 50 ETH raised minus 10 ETH LP = where's the other 40 ETH? The Response Community exploded with questions. @rskagy @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz @enterSIGNALS response? Complete silence. Not even "we're looking into it." Just crickets 🦗 Tonight @BaseICCM presale launches. Same launchpad, same advisor network. No Signals resolution, no answers, just the next launch. So let me ask: Why did you post the Uniswap link early then delete it? Why give Signals 10 ETH LP when you did 20-25 ETH for others? Where's the 40 ETH? And why launch ICMM 3 days later with zero Signals answers? The pattern is clear: Build trust → Execute exit → Move to next To @BaseICCM @districtxyz @TheAgencyVC: You proved you CAN execute properly with Titanium and House. But your "flagship" got half the LP and a premature trading link that got deleted? That's not incompetence. That's intentional. Cancel tonight. Fix Signals first - add proper LP like you did before, explain the deleted tweet, show where 40 ETH went. THEN launch ICMM. Your backers (a16z, Initialized) invested in transparency. Is this it? To the community: They know how to do this right. They proved it 3+ times. They chose NOT to for Signals. Now they're asking for more ETH 72 hours later? If you're in ICMM WL - would you trust someone who took your money, went silent, then asked for more? RT if Signals needs fixing before any new launch. cc: @rskagy @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz @BaseICCM @enterSIGNALS ⏰ 8 hours. Community is watching. #SIGNALS #ICMM #Base #CryptoAlert

@saigon_hunter @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC Exactly. Nemesis was good at launch. Raised 105 ETH, proper LP, good start. But Now, all @districtxyz projects bleeding post-Signals. That's why @BaseICCM tonight is a problem.

@NotFail51 @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC I see the NEMESIS project was very successful when they first listed it.

@PendingMint @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC true

@NotFail51 @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC Terrible launch

@saigon_hunter @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC First HOUR you couldn't even sell - ZERO liquidity in pools.

@NotFail51 @BaseICCM @districtxyz @RSKAGY @TheAgencyVC How many times has Signal multiplied compared to your presale purchase price?