NotGuilty

1.3K posts

NotGuilty

NotGuilty

@NotGuiltyEsq

She/Her | Attorney • Public Defender |

California, USA شامل ہوئے Temmuz 2019
427 فالونگ695 فالوورز
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
Don't let Obama play the Iran card in order to start a war in order to get elected--be careful Republicans!
English
2.1K
24.1K
33.3K
0
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Josh Kale
Josh Kale@JoshKale·
Anthropic: “We’ll work with the military on everything except autonomous killer robots and mass surveillance of Americans.” The Pentagon: “We don’t plan to do those things.” Anthropic: “Great, put it in writing.” The Pentagon: “No.” Trump: “BAN THEM FROM THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT.” This may be one of the most consequential AI policy decisions in history
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

BREAKING: President Trump orders ALL Federal agencies in the US Government to immediately stop using Anthropic's technology.

English
176
4.1K
28.4K
1.6M
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin – watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.
English
3K
44.5K
63.8K
0
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!
English
7.4K
75.3K
157.2K
0
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Ring paid somewhere between $8 and $10 million for a 30-second Super Bowl spot to tell 120 million viewers that their cameras now scan neighborhoods using AI. The math is wild. Ring has roughly 20 million devices in American homes. Search Party is enabled by default. The opt-out rate on default settings in consumer tech is historically around 5%. So approximately 19 million cameras are now running AI pattern matching on anything that moves past your front door. Today the target is dogs. The same infrastructure already handles “Familiar Faces,” which builds biometric profiles of every person your camera sees, whether they know about it or not. Ring settled with the FTC for $5.8 million after employees had unrestricted access to customers’ bedroom and bathroom footage for years. They’re now partnered with Flock Safety, which routes footage to local law enforcement. ICE has accessed Flock data through local police departments acting as intermediaries. Senator Markey’s investigation found Ring’s privacy protections only apply to device owners. If you’re a neighbor, a delivery driver, a passerby, you have no rights and no recourse. This tells you everything about Amazon’s actual product. The customer paid for the camera. The customer pays the electricity. The customer pays the $3.99/month subscription. And Amazon gets a surveillance grid that would cost tens of billions to build from scratch, with an AI layer activated by default, and a law enforcement pipeline already connected. They wrapped all of that in a lost puppy commercial because that’s the only version of this story anyone would willingly opt into.
Le'Veon Bell@LeVeonBell

if you’re not ripping your ‘Ring’ camera off your house right now and dropping the whole thing into a pot of boiling water what are you doing?

English
734
17K
75.3K
7M
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Aaron Regunberg
Aaron Regunberg@AaronRegunberg·
I just want to name how profoundly disgusted I am, and I think we should all be, by this set of demands. Almost all of this is entirely, profoundly unenforceable — meaning it's meaningless! (Who could possibly look at this administration's record, to say nothing of ICE's policy of violating court orders, and think that almost any of this would have any material impact.) They have abandoned any demands regarding ICE's obscene budget. They have abandoned anything related to creating a mechanism for victims to sue ICE for its constitutional violations. They have abandoned anything related to stopping ICE from subverting the upcoming elections. And this is Dems' opening bid! This is the "full loaf" that they are, I am sure, prepared to accept a slice or a crumb from! Just a profound, profound political failure, in the face of outright fascism. I think this merits — or actually necessitates — an outraged response.
Chuck Schumer@SenSchumer

SENATE AND HOUSE DEMOCRATS ARE UNITED ON REINING IN THE ABUSES OF ICE. Americans have watched in horror as ICE has terrorized communities across the country. Federal agents can’t continue to cause chaos in our cities while more Americans are killed. We must rein in ICE. Here’s what we are demanding:

English
34
356
1.5K
44.2K
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Scott MacFarlane
Scott MacFarlane@MacFarlaneNews·
The four prosecutors who spearheaded a $250 million Minnesota fraud case will not be in court at the next trial because .. they've all left their jobs in recent days, along with more than a dozen others in a growing wave of resignations cbsnews.com/news/minnesota…
English
59
816
2K
300.7K
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Noah Cat
Noah Cat@Cartidise·
STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT STOP USING YOUR NOTES APP AS A PASSWORD VAULT
English
2.2K
2K
89K
19.3M
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
taylr
taylr@taylr·
they showed us an example of a legal, judicial warrant vs an ICE administrative warrant
taylr tweet media
English
1
12.6K
34.5K
559K
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Matt McDermott
Matt McDermott@mattmfm·
Really can’t get over this video of more than a half dozen ICE agents forming a tactical perimeter at a suburban Minnesota Target so their commander can use the bathroom, cosplaying like they’re in Fallujah. What an absurd waste of taxpayer dollars.
English
3.2K
8.9K
60.3K
2.6M
NotGuilty
NotGuilty@NotGuiltyEsq·
@ax_onoken Is it open already? I’m in Taipei and want to visit
English
1
0
0
34
onoken | owl*tree
onoken | owl*tree@ax_onoken·
メロンブックス台北支店ギャラリー併設でオープンか!海外の実店舗に作品が並ぶと思うと付加価値でかいなぁ。次のアルバムでも委託継続しよう。melonbooks.co.jp/special/fair/s…
onoken | owl*tree tweet media
日本語
2
2
19
2.4K
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Paul Sherman
Paul Sherman@PaulMSherman·
Find you someone who looks at you the way Justice Gorsuch looks at cert. petitions involving tribal sovereignty.
Paul Sherman tweet media
English
12
70
917
143.5K
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Emily Galvin-Almanza
Emily Galvin-Almanza@GalvinAlmanza·
Law enforcement officers who lie *should* be fired... But, I'm sorry to say, they aren't. So routinely we have a term you should know: testilying.
Darwin BondGraham@DarwinBondGraha

Law enforcement officers who lie are normally fired. Lying taints casework, makes an officer worse than useless for prosecutions, obtaining warrants, etc. when leaders lie it’s even worse. theguardian.com/us-news/2025/n…

English
1
12
41
2.7K
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
Billy Binion
Billy Binion@billybinion·
Perfect example of why jury trials matter. The government had to argue—in public—that throwing a sandwich at a man in a bulletproof vest caused “fear of immediate bodily harm.” And the jury called that what it was: overreach. Prosecutors shouldn’t go unchecked.
reason@reason

A jury has acquitted the D.C. "Sandwich Guy," despite testimony from a Border Patrol officer about the devastating impact of the footlong sandwich against his bulletproof vest. reason.com/2025/11/06/d-c…

English
520
5.5K
51.5K
1.3M
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
James🔻
James🔻@GoodVibePolitik·
A lot of the anti-SNAP rhetoric seems to be coming from people who think that people living in poverty should be eating prison rations and whatever they can scrounge from the nearest dumpster. Just an unfettered kind of evil that wishes undue suffering for the poor.
English
541
2.9K
14.1K
176.4K
NotGuilty
NotGuilty@NotGuiltyEsq·
Crim defense lawyer here and I can tell you 100% of the welfare fraud cases I’ve seen are the government preying on the ignorance of poor people who fail to fill out paperwork properly or fail to update their new employment history (get a new job a raise etc)
yarn enjoyer 🇵🇸@Purlnelope

I’ve been on SNAP. you have to prove you qualify for it every 6 months. They do not give you enough to feed a family, this is on purpose. They tell you this. Nobody can defraud the govt that easily. You know who can and did? Brett Favre.

English
0
1
2
126
NotGuilty ری ٹویٹ کیا
yarn enjoyer 🇵🇸
yarn enjoyer 🇵🇸@Purlnelope·
I’ve been on SNAP. you have to prove you qualify for it every 6 months. They do not give you enough to feed a family, this is on purpose. They tell you this. Nobody can defraud the govt that easily. You know who can and did? Brett Favre.
English
6
8.5K
63.9K
774.5K
NotGuilty
NotGuilty@NotGuiltyEsq·
@am_yers my con law prof was there with Trump and Giuliani during J6 bc he was one of trumps lawyers so I really have no idea bc he’s disbarred 😆 😂
English
0
0
2
31
lyss, esq
lyss, esq@am_yers·
What are they teaching in con law these days
English
50
36
356
18.9K
NotGuilty
NotGuilty@NotGuiltyEsq·
@WaqarVick Without fail, I’m always in trial over Thanksgiving like whyyyyy
English
0
0
1
23
Vick
Vick@WaqarVick·
Why does the fall criminal trial docket always feel so punishing?
English
2
0
4
297