Roman Stanek

16.4K posts

Roman Stanek banner
Roman Stanek

Roman Stanek

@RomanStanek

Watching how things fall apart.

San Francisco, CA شامل ہوئے Şubat 2008
2.3K فالونگ11.2K فالوورز
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Adam Thierer
Adam Thierer@AdamThierer·
truly one of the most amazing developments in trans-Atlantic tech policy over the past 20 years is the way that Europe set out to regulate US tech giants into the ground, but only made them more dominant as a result. This Economist headline really says it.
Adam Thierer tweet mediaAdam Thierer tweet media
James Pethokoukis ⏩️⤴️@JimPethokoukis

'Here is an uncomfortable truth for hand-wringing policymakers: Europe’s dependency on America is in no small part Europe’s own fault. Decades of over-regulating the old continent’s economy left businesses there unable to compete with American firms' economist.com/europe/2026/04…

English
70
797
4.9K
334.9K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
Kinda weird the Chief Product Officer of Anthropic was on Figma’s board the whole time Anthropic was building their design tool
English
41
16
1K
85K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ivan Landabaso
Ivan Landabaso@IvanLandabaso·
AI startups:
Ivan Landabaso tweet media
English
7
14
88
4K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ben Horwitz
Ben Horwitz@horwitzben·
I made the anti-Grammarly. Mess up your emails with AI. Sinceerly.com
English
430
590
11.1K
1.9M
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jake
Jake@JustJake·
4 roles of a founder: - Vision - Alignment - Culture - Urgency
English
35
64
777
25.5K
Roman Stanek
Roman Stanek@RomanStanek·
Venture debt works only if the future resembles the past.
English
0
0
0
97
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
austin petersmith
i made a chrome extension that removes the AI slop from my linkedin feed
austin petersmith tweet media
English
373
2K
37.3K
584.7K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Sick
Sick@sickdotdev·
$20 codex feels like a tool $20 claude feels like a demo
English
95
66
1.9K
68.8K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gary Brode
Gary Brode@Gary_Brode·
The Strait of Hormuz Reverse Uno Card When Raji Khabbaz and I were running Silver Arrow Investment Management, whenever we were trying to figure out why something happened, he was unsatisfied the explanation that people are sometimes stupid and institutions are often stupid. He correctly thought that people usually have a good reason (at least to them) for doing something even if it appears to make little sense to an outsider. More importantly, he thought that “sometimes people are stupid” was a lazy answer that was dismissive. As investors, it was our goal to understand what was happening, not to ignore it. Recently, I’ve written that many of President Trump’s critics are making the same error. When Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway that previously transported 20% of the world’s oil supply, the price of oil rose. Gas prices in the US have risen in response. Many screamed that this was an obvious move by the Iranian regime and insisted President Trump should have known it was something they’d do. How could he not know?! In 2002, the US Navy conducted war games they called the Millennium Challenge. One side represented Iran. The other represented the technologically superior US Navy and included an aircraft carrier, warships, and cruisers. The US Navy side had a substantial advantage in firepower. Retired Marine Corps Lieutenant General Paul K. Van Riper used asymmetric warfare tactics to wipe out the US side in one day. Had this been a real fight, the US would have lost 20,000 servicemen. The result was such an embarrassment that the Navy re-floated the sunk ships, changed the rules of engagement to ensure a US victory, and started the challenge again. These games were not a secret. They have been widely covered in the mainstream media and have been the subject of a New York Times documentary. Over the past two decades, I have seen the Millennium Challenge discussed in my daily financial news reading at least a dozen times. The event has its own Wikipedia page. Regardless of your opinion of President Trump, do you really believe that neither he, nor anyone in the White House, nor any of his military advisors, nor Secretary of War, Hegseth knew about this? I realize that many of you reading this have strong negative emotions regarding President Trump. I’m not asking you to like or respect him. I’m just suggesting that “he’s stupid and has no idea what he’s doing” is not good analysis. This is a point I’ve made in this space in the past. Early in the war, Iran closed the Strait which placed economic pressure on the rest of the world. Despite the fact that it was Iran mining the Strait and shooting at the ships that attempted to navigate it, many countries expressed anger at the US and Israel. This was the outcome Iran wanted. Then, the regime decided to allow friendly ships to pass if they paid a fee. The fees were about $1/barrel of oil, or about $2MM per large container vessel. (Many of these fees were paid in Bitcoin, something macro analyst, @peruvian_bull, explained in an excellent post within the past week.) This looked like worst-case scenario for the US. Iran succeeded in closing the Strait and causing economic problems all over the world, then found a way to profit from their own actions. Then, President Trump played his “reverse uno” card. He correctly realized that it wasn’t just the rest of the world that depended on free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and that it was Iran that had the most exposure. Iran is a big oil producer, and oil exports account for 80% of Iran’s exports, 60% of government revenue, and 25% of its GDP. It turns out that Iran has more economic exposure to this narrow waterway than anyone else. President Trump sent the US Navy to form a blockade. He closed the Strait himself ensuring no more $2MM/vessel charges and an inability for Iran to export oil. Iran is close to filling its own storage. Once its oil tanks are full, the regime has two choices, either capitulate and come to an agreement with the US, or to stop producing from its own wells. The problem with the second choice is that it’s difficult to reverse. Stopping production on an active oil well tends to damage it and it’s hard to re-start later. Iran now has a limited amount of time to find a course of action before 25% of its GDP becomes permanently(ish) impaired. While no one in the US likes paying more for gas, prices were much higher just four years ago in 2022 and around $4/gallon in 2008, 2011, and 2012 when $4 had more purchasing power than it does now. The US is a net energy exporter with an economy that has survived higher prices in the past. Foreign ships are turning away from the Strait of Hormuz and sailing to Texas and other southern US ports to fill up at premium prices. I’m not suggesting that this is great for the US; but rather, that the US is well-suited to manage the situation while Iran is about to be faced with a massive long-term problem. Finally, Iran maintains control of the country using extensive human infrastructure. There are police everywhere monitoring protests, internet usage, the attire of citizens, and the hair of Iranian women. That level of control is expensive and the government just lost 60% of its revenue. I’m wondering how long they’ll keep doing their jobs without paychecks. I don’t know how this conflict will end. What I do know is that President Trump and the US Navy have turned Iran’s biggest strategic strength into a giant weakness. Sometimes people do stupid things. And sometimes, we just aren’t seeing the reasoning behind those actions. Last week, one of DKI’s interns wrote, ”The bottom line is that (financial analysis) can tell you what the market’s pricing in, but it’s your job to figure out why”. Right now, the mullahs are facing a difficult decision. It will be interesting to see what comes next.
English
118
275
1.3K
570.9K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Justine Moore
Justine Moore@venturetwins·
It's a weird time in AI land. Working at a big lab is attractive because they have resources (compute!) - and yet the opportunity cost of NOT doing your own thing has never felt higher. This is particularly true if your model or product isn't on your lab's "critical path."
English
51
13
436
32K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Michael Burry Stock Tracker ♟
If Sam Bankman-Fried did nothing illegal, he might have been the best VC in history What SBF bought vs. what it's worth today: • Cursor: ~$200K → ~$3B (+1,499,900%) • Anthropic: ~$499M → $82.3B (+16,400%) • SpaceX: ~$200M → ~$15B (+7,400%) • Solana: ~$189M → $5.1B (+2,600%) • Robinhood: $612.5M → $4.9B (+700%) • Genesis Digital: $1.17B → $3.5B (+200%) Had he done nothing wrong, he'd have an estimated worth of $114,000,000,000 today Instead he's tweeting from Federal Correctional Institution
Michael Burry Stock Tracker ♟ tweet media
English
390
596
6.9K
1.3M
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Craig Weiss
Craig Weiss@craigzLiszt·
these ai labs are about to take over the world, and everyone is acting like it’s a normal wednesday
English
93
21
349
11.6K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
signüll
signüll@signulll·
not a single person i have ever spoken to uses gemini for coding. this is still very very weird. why is gemini so bad at coding when google has scoured the web full of code for decades?
English
1.1K
159
9.5K
827.7K
Roman Stanek ری ٹویٹ کیا
Alex Volkov
Alex Volkov@altryne·
The goal of this model to first detect and then remove personally identifiable information (PII) in text. This definitely helps OpenAI to anonymize the prompts they train on. The model is focused on scale and speed, with a very high accuracy scores on recall and precision!
Alex Volkov tweet media
English
1
3
29
6.9K
Roman Stanek
Roman Stanek@RomanStanek·
SpaceX will rename Cursor to CodeX, not to be confused with Codex.
English
0
0
2
261
Roman Stanek
Roman Stanek@RomanStanek·
The fact that GPUs behave like perishable goods with a rapid depreciation curve explains everything about the SpaceX-Cursor deal, including the price. It's a time-to-deploy arbitrage.
English
0
0
2
278
Roman Stanek
Roman Stanek@RomanStanek·
@kozzi11 Neplacení daní je asi technický důvod :)
Čeština
0
0
0
83
Daniel Kozák
Daniel Kozák@kozzi11·
@RomanStanek Nejlepší jsou podniky kde mají cedulku že s technických důvodů dočasně nelze platit kartou. A tuto cedulku tam mají už druhým rokem 😁
Čeština
1
0
0
115
Roman Stanek
Roman Stanek@RomanStanek·
Ten vykřičník na konci je tam proto, aby to bylo všem otravům, co chtějí platit kartou, jasné
Roman Stanek tweet media
Čeština
3
0
3
1K