FinalMasterM

185 posts

FinalMasterM banner
FinalMasterM

FinalMasterM

@TheFinalMasterM

Lover of video games, anime, manga. 🔞 NSFW report and discussions. Minors, Antis, SHEDtwt DNI/Blocked instantly.

Home شامل ہوئے Mart 2026
35 فالونگ79 فالوورز
hippro
hippro@TheCosmickidsg1·
@IncroyableSauce wanna know what's ironic, the lol they used was actually from an anti loli song, hilarious
English
8
0
3
2K
CaslNoa
CaslNoa@CaslNoa·
@IncroyableSauce Are you saying that it makes us look guilty to show evidence we aren't? How do you get to this conclusion?
English
2
0
10
322
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
Man, might get verified so I can filter out a lot of the shitty posters.
English
0
0
0
39
FinalMasterM ری ٹویٹ کیا
Pipi Slayer🦇💀
Pipi Slayer🦇💀@ppslayer_vt·
This is mental illness. It's all body positivity until god forbid genetics dont give me giant breasts. I am a 24 year old woman, and I'm so tired of people acting like being atracted to me is fucking pedophillia
Pipi Slayer🦇💀 tweet media
English
2.7K
6.1K
174.3K
4.5M
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
@speakukorg "You have to give up your rights so we can force propaganda on you!" I hope the people in the UK who want to keep their freedoms win or leave before it becomes a Muslim rape paradise.
English
0
0
1
15
SPEAK UK
SPEAK UK@speakukorg·
When people imagine legislation designed to ensure "online safety", they sometimes forget that it actually requires everyone to submit their ID to access much of the internet. In the UK, you now have to submit an ID to access some blog posts and discussion forums.
SPEAK UK tweet media
English
12
49
160
3.9K
FinalMasterM ری ٹویٹ کیا
Mizu🛟
Mizu🛟@miz_blank·
Arcana💙#NIKKE #ニケ
Mizu🛟 tweet media
Español
3
529
4.9K
21.4K
FinalMasterM ری ٹویٹ کیا
chiimanju 📛💢
chiimanju 📛💢@chiimanjuUu·
Smug brat
chiimanju 📛💢 tweet media
Nederlands
22
643
9K
43.6K
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
Let me guess, mass reported.
FinalMasterM tweet mediaFinalMasterM tweet media
English
13
18
191
1.2K
Nikandros
Nikandros@realNikandros·
The pedophiles bundled together to brigade and community note my thread asserting it claims that it is NECESSARY to use CSAM to draw small anime girls, when it doesn't say that. Ever. This is a total strawman, which is expected of lolicon retards. If you say they're attracted to children and call them pedophiles (which they are, it's literally what a lolicon means in Japanese), they will claim you're calling them predators and demand evidence of them preying on a child. This kind of strawmanning and elevation of claims is the cornerstone of the lolicon persecution complex. If you make a thread talking about how artists use references and that if you're looking at lolicon art, you have no guarantee the artist did not use images of real children or even CSAM as reference to produce it, they will claim (as you can see in the community note) that "CSAM is NECESSARY to draw small anime girls". The only thing that is asserted is that all lolicon art is based on what real children look like, which is undeniably true. Loli characters don't look like old grandmothers or adult women. Despite being stylized, they heavily emphasize childlike features. This isn't the same as claiming all lolicon art uses photographs of real children as reference or traces photographs of real children. The whole point is that if you're willing to draw a line at Shadman draw explicit images of real children, you should reasonably be skeptical about what material the other lolicon art you look at is based on. As is stated at the end, it could even be CSAM passed through an AI filter. "But it literally never happens!" I already mention the example of Shadman in the OP, but that seemed to fly over people's heads, but there are other examples: x.com/realNikandros/… I've already pointed to an example of Dorontabi, the artist responsible for the "uoooh 😭💢 correction" memes that he publicly talked about hoarding Japanese child gravure photos. x.com/P33P00peepee/s… Other commenters brought up other examples like the author of Vampeerz clearly using a photo of a real child on their work. What is the number of examples I need to pull up before you accept that there is a non-zero risk that the artist behind the lolicon images you enjoy might be using real children as reference? It doesn't matter what the artist says, because they have every incentive to lie. Just like lolicons have every incentive to lie and boldly strawman me, because they know exactly what they are and refuse to accept it.
Nikandros tweet media
Nikandros@realNikandros

"It's fictional content!" "No real children are being harmed!" Contrary to popular belief, artists don't conjure images from a void in their imagination. It's actually impossible to think up a totally original, unique idea that isn't derived from something that already exists. What reference material do you think loli artists use for anatomy, pose, proportions etc? Just because anime or cartoons are stylized doesn't mean that they're entirely detached from real human anatomy. The reason why predators keep getting caught with this stuff is because these drawings are depicting child anatomy in a manner that pedophiles find arousing. The other people looking at it aren't necessarily going to molest a real child, but they still have a pedophilic attraction. What I find fascinating is how many l*licons are willing to condemn Shadman for drawing explicit art of real children or child actresses, while tolerating drawings that "are not based on real children". Bro, they all are. The only difference is the extent to which it looks like a specific child. If it looks like one kid it's not okay, but if the drawing is based on pictures of 10 kids it's fine? How does this work? Do you think someone like Chibireviews is evaluating what material the artist use as reference when drawing the pictures in his special folder? If all you have is the final product, you really can't, unless you're already familiar with the source material. For all he knows, the artist might've used CSAM as reference. You think the artist is going to say that publicly? It could also be CSAM passed through an AI filter. As AI models get better that's only going to become less noticeable and more likely to happen. Vaush already had a bunch of AI images in his tax folder that he didn't notice were AI.

English
66
84
709
45.4K
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
@KongoUsAmongUs @realNikandros @Winwinsarun DSM-V on pedophilic tendencies needs a lot more studies. I believe anyone with attraction to minors should seek help and be studied. I also believe anyone with attraction that doesn't is a potential pedophile.
English
0
0
3
36
KongusAmongUs
KongusAmongUs@KongoUsAmongUs·
@TheFinalMasterM @realNikandros @Winwinsarun The law does speak on what constitutes CSEM, (including specifying that cartoons do not count) but does not say anything about legal consequences for mislabeling content as CSEM. You're thinking of a different law, provided below. Many states have different penalties or criteria.
KongusAmongUs tweet mediaKongusAmongUs tweet mediaKongusAmongUs tweet media
English
2
0
4
221
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
@realNikandros @SoVl_UnVain None of which have anything to do with real or realistic depictions of children, but fictional, styalized characters most commonly found in Japanese media (manga, anime, video games).
English
1
4
19
204
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
@realNikandros @SoVl_UnVain Lolicon, like shotacon, kodocon, etc are just portmanteau with roots in Otaku culture. Google translate doesn't translate either shotacon (young boy equivalent to loli) or kokocon (young child) in the same manner because that portion of its translate is based on an algorithm.
English
1
4
17
127
FinalMasterM
FinalMasterM@TheFinalMasterM·
@realNikandros @Winwinsarun Federal law 2256 makes it illegal to misidentify or label material as csa. For someone who loves to Google, you don't seem capable of doing any research.
English
1
0
22
173
Nikandros
Nikandros@realNikandros·
@Winwinsarun Yeah, we all saw the ridiculous community note they put on Schlep's tweet claiming it's illegal to call something CSAM.
English
4
1
13
1.4K
FinalMasterM ری ٹویٹ کیا
Brandon Riley
Brandon Riley@BrandonRStreams·
How to draw a loli, for dummies Step 1: Draw human girl in anime style Step 2: Make head and eyes slightly bigger That's it
Brandon Riley tweet mediaBrandon Riley tweet mediaBrandon Riley tweet mediaBrandon Riley tweet media
Nikandros@realNikandros

"It's fictional content!" "No real children are being harmed!" Contrary to popular belief, artists don't conjure images from a void in their imagination. It's actually impossible to think up a totally original, unique idea that isn't derived from something that already exists. What reference material do you think loli artists use for anatomy, pose, proportions etc? Just because anime or cartoons are stylized doesn't mean that they're entirely detached from real human anatomy. The reason why predators keep getting caught with this stuff is because these drawings are depicting child anatomy in a manner that pedophiles find arousing. The other people looking at it aren't necessarily going to molest a real child, but they still have a pedophilic attraction. What I find fascinating is how many l*licons are willing to condemn Shadman for drawing explicit art of real children or child actresses, while tolerating drawings that "are not based on real children". Bro, they all are. The only difference is the extent to which it looks like a specific child. If it looks like one kid it's not okay, but if the drawing is based on pictures of 10 kids it's fine? How does this work? Do you think someone like Chibireviews is evaluating what material the artist use as reference when drawing the pictures in his special folder? If all you have is the final product, you really can't, unless you're already familiar with the source material. For all he knows, the artist might've used CSAM as reference. You think the artist is going to say that publicly? It could also be CSAM passed through an AI filter. As AI models get better that's only going to become less noticeable and more likely to happen. Vaush already had a bunch of AI images in his tax folder that he didn't notice were AI.

English
108
452
7K
225.7K