Tim Ray

@Built2Rise @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Bongino didn’t say what he was claimed to have said.

@TimRayWV @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Did you not listen to the podcast

Why @joekent16jan19 believes there is much more to investigate related to Charlie Kirk's assassination ⬇️ megynkelly.com/2026/03/20/joe…

@Built2Rise @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Yes

What you just did wasn’t a rebuttal, it was a pile of accusations replacing actual argument. You started by attacking a position I didn’t even make. I never said “support every action of Israel or you’re against God.” That’s something you invented so you could knock it down. A modern government and God’s covenant are not the same thing, and pretending they are just shows you’re arguing with a caricature instead of what was actually said. Then you pivot to how Christians are treated in Israel as if that somehow disproves Scripture. It doesn’t. Christians have been mistreated in countless places throughout history, including by people who claimed to be religious. That has never been evidence that God broke His promises or rejected entire groups of people. It proves human sin, not divine inconsistency. And the claim that “Judeo-Christianity is blasphemy” collapses under even basic biblical understanding. Jesus was a Jew. The apostles were Jews. The entire foundation of the New Testament is built on the Old Testament. Christianity doesn’t float in midair detached from that it is the fulfillment of it. If you cut off the Jewish root, you don’t purify Christianity, you destroy its foundation. What you’re really doing is blending political frustration with theological conclusions and treating them as if they’re the same thing. They’re not. You can critique any government on earth, including Israel, without rewriting what Scripture says about God’s covenant and His faithfulness. So no, this isn’t me backpedaling. It’s you shifting the argument into something easier to attack because dealing with the actual biblical issue is harder.

You went full blown Zionist right out of the gate with your “support Israel or you’re going against God’s word” nonsense. Now you’re backpedaling, ignoring every point made about Christian life in Israel and saying nothing about the collective hate of Christians by the settlers there. Judeo-Christianity is contrived blasphemy, and it’s evident in your rhetoric.

If you're curious how zionism is a warped ideology born in the 1800's, not the bible, this is a speedy summary that most people are clueless about. The truth shall set you free. Deception may lead to nuclear war. @JohnMappin johnmappin.substack.com/p/the-theology…

We didn’t become a nation until we gained our independence. The original settlers came here seeking religious freedom, escaping the control of England. Over time, however, England reasserted authority over the colonies, leading to the Revolutionary War that ultimately resulted in our independence.

“America began as colonies of the British Empire”

@JenyaMia @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 @TuckerCarlson But, that is a lie! He didn’t have that authority. The FBI handles all terrorism investigations. Joe Kent as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), was essentially a counter-terrorism analyst. Definitely not an investigator.

@TimRayWV @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 he explained it in his interview with @TuckerCarlson … when there is a reason to believe that the foreign powers are involved, the counter terrorism has to get involved.

@mrswolt @BonnieK92175868 @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 What does that prove?

@TimRayWV @BonnieK92175868 @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Because he talked about it in the interviews

Here’s the problem: Kent has spoken about looking into possible foreign connections in high-profile incidents. But, as critics point out: He describes actions using language like “investigating” or “running down leads,” which sounds official. But under U.S. law, actual investigations are conducted by agencies like the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He has suggested he was prevented from continuing to pursue certain leads. You cannot be formally “shut down” from something that was not an official investigation. Kent often references his Special Forces and counterterrorism background, which is legitimate. Military intelligence work overseas ≠ domestic criminal investigation authority. Counterterrorism operations ≠ FBI-style casework. If someone speaks as though they are conducting an investigation, but they don’t hold a position that legally allows them to do that, then either the wording is inflated or the activity was informal. Supporters would say he was just analyzing information or following leads in a personal or advisory capacity. Critics say the way it was presented gives the impression of official authority that wasn’t there. The second tension shows up in statements about being “shut down.” He has suggested that he was prevented from continuing to pursue certain lines of inquiry. Critics immediately push back on that because you can’t be formally shut down from an investigation you were never authorized to run. Federal agencies don’t terminate private inquiries, they simply operate within their own jurisdiction. So again, the contradiction is between the implication of official involvement and the legal reality that no such role existed. When he claims that Donald Trump was “duped” by Israelis, he’s not making a small or casual point. He’s alleging that a close U.S. ally outmaneuvered the President of the United States and, by extension, the entire U.S. intelligence apparatus. That would require a massive failure across agencies like the CIA, NSA, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, along with no internal pushback, no whistleblowers, and no confirmed investigative findings. That’s an extraordinary claim. The contradiction comes from the gap between how serious that allegation is and how it’s presented. On one side, Kent leans on his background to signal credibility in intelligence matters. On the other side, he puts forward a sweeping geopolitical claim without publicly verifiable evidence to support it. In intelligence work, claims at that level are never taken at face value without corroboration. They require sourcing, validation, and usually multiple independent confirmations. None of that has been demonstrated publicly in this case. You can’t appeal to intelligence credibility when it suits you, then bypass the standards of evidence that intelligence work actually requires. Either there is hard proof, in which case it wouldn’t be discussed casually in interviews, or there isn’t, in which case presenting it as near certainty undermines the credibility you’re trying to establish. You don’t get to speak with the authority of intelligence while operating without the discipline of evidence.

@TimRayWV @BonnieK92175868 @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 What you just described is exactly what Joe was trying to accomplish. He wasn’t investigating. He was providing intel based on evidence he saw. They didn’t want anything to do with the information he provided so it never got investigated further…

The National Counterterrorism Center is not a law enforcement body. It does not open cases, conduct interrogations, collect evidence for prosecution, or make arrests. Its role is to analyze and integrate intelligence about terrorism and make sure agencies are sharing information. When an assassination happens, especially inside the United States, the case is led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The FBI has the legal authority to investigate federal crimes, gather evidence, and build cases for prosecution. If terrorism is suspected, the FBI still leads, often working through Joint Terrorism Task Forces. I don’t believe him, I believe he is attempting to gain sympathy from Charlie Kirk Trump supporters. I look for him to face prosecution for leaking classified information.

@TimRayWV @BonnieK92175868 @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Did he say he was trying to take over the case? He and Tulsi saw some things that made them want to look into it further because it was relevant to their department. That isn’t weird. What’s weird is that they were told to stop in a heated way.

So let me get this straight… Defending Jews from slander = supporting everything Israel does? By that logic, defending Christians = supporting every abuse done in church history. That’s not truth. That’s a double standard. I can defend Christians, reject injustice against Palestinians, and refuse collective hatred toward Jews all at once. The problem isn’t my consistency. It’s your need for a scapegoat.

@TimRayWV @AwakenWithJP @JohnMappin Palestinian Authorities have no authority when it comes to the settlers wanting ethnic cleansing. If only you defended Christians as rabidly as you do Jews. m.economictimes.com/news/defence/i… philippepernot.com/2024/07/25/lif… americamagazine.org/politics-socie…

@brunobarking Thank you for your post as well.

Thx for this. The timing of that last reaping harvest , separating the wheat 🌾 who will go safely to the “barn” ie the Father’s House , vs the Tares, bundled and left behind for wrath judgment , is laid out in Torah. Since Rapture is a reaping harvest, it must comply with Leviticus 25.

@Cozmonaut13 @Pete_Hutter @AwakenWithJP @JohnMappin Now posting a video of Charlie is a non sequitur & strawman?

@TimRayWV @Pete_Hutter @AwakenWithJP @JohnMappin Me: “I pray we stand in solidarity w/ our Jewish brothers & sisters”. (W/ video of a Rabbinic son of holocaust survivors providing historical context.) You: Video of Kirk about blaming Jews for everything”. = non sequitur & strawman. Thank you for further proving my point. 💚

What response are you referring to? I used AI to search Dan Bongino show transcripts because it would take hours to go through them all. Although I’ve watched those shows, I used AI to make sure I didn’t miss anything. AI is a powerful research tool and often more effective than traditional search engines. So why wouldn’t I make the best use of my time? Now it seems you’re unable to refute my claims, so you resort to sophistry and ad hominem attacks, as if I’m just a chatbot using AI to create false answers. The proper response is to refute what I posted, prove it wrong, or shut up!

@TimRayWV @ZachCostello_ @hodgetwins 😍 did GPT formulate that answer for you? Be honest

Dan Bongino claims that Joe Kent is lying about Charlie Kirk being in the White House to advise President Trump against a war in Iran. Bret Weinstein's text messages with Charlie actually prove the opposite, and that Dan Bongino is a liar.

So even if Joe Kent had a role connected to counterterrorism or intelligence at NCTC, his authority would have been limited to analysis and coordination, not operational control of an investigation. He could review intelligence, flag threats, or share information with agencies, but he would not have the legal authority to direct agents, pursue suspects, or run an assassination case. This becomes even more important in a situation involving a killing on U.S. soil. That immediately triggers a federal criminal investigation. If there are foreign ties, it becomes a counterterrorism matter, but still within the FBI’s jurisdiction. The NCTC would support by providing intelligence analysis, helping connect foreign dots, and coordinating information across agencies, but it would not take over the case.

@TimRayWV @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Unless there is a foreign tie. He said there was more to look into, but was stopped.

@CEO_FPL @ZachCostello_ @hodgetwins I’m not a chatbot, maybe you are!

@TimRayWV @ZachCostello_ @hodgetwins Thank you mr chatbot👌

@BonnieK92175868 @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 The FBI handles investigations like that, he didn’t have the authority to conduct one himself. This looks more like scapegoating to generate political pressure, but it’s not going to hold up. Kent has already made multiple contradictory statements.

@TimRayWV @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 He was investigating whether there was a foreign tie to his assassination…until he was told to stop.

So, you deny that Palestinian Authorities control Bethlehem? Bethlehem is located in the West Bank and is primarily under the civil and security administration of the Palestinian National Authority (PA), particularly within Area A. Following the 1995 Oslo Accords, control was transferred to the PA.

I’ll take my fellow congregation member’s experience over some rando on X. Settlers are taking their land, bombing them, and driving them out, been happening for decades, and not just in Bethlehem. Taybeh was attacked so bad that the church released a public call for help. Maybe you should do some research and see how Christians are treated throughout the holy land by the “chosen” and then we can have a real discussion about your obsession with a people who deny and speak heresy against Yahweh.

If Kent was operating within or alongside intelligence circles (for example, connected to national security or advisory roles), that still wouldn’t grant him criminal investigative authority. Agencies like: •Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) •National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) Do not conduct domestic criminal investigations. Their role is intelligence gathering, not building prosecutable criminal cases. Even if Kent had access to intelligence, that is not the same as running an official investigation. If Kent accessed or shared classified intelligence related to the case without proper authorization: •That can trigger federal investigation itself •It may explain reports of scrutiny or investigation into his actions Classified material tied to an active case is tightly controlled. Unauthorized use is a serious offense. When an incident is suspected to be terrorism, jurisdiction becomes more restricted, not open to individuals. The lead authority almost always shifts to the: •Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) The FBI is the primary agency for domestic terrorism investigations under federal law. They coordinate: •Evidence collection •Intelligence integration •Interagency cooperation •Arrests and prosecutions No individual, regardless of experience, can simply step in because they believe it’s terrorism.

@TimRayWV @MegynKellyShow @TalkMullins @joekent16jan19 Because killing a US political activist on livestream was an act of terrorism --- that's why

Scary stuff!

@Cozmonaut13 @Pete_Hutter @AwakenWithJP @JohnMappin How do you feel about this?

@TimRayWV @Pete_Hutter @AwakenWithJP @JohnMappin Take a breath, Tim, review the history. And respond once you’ve taken the time to learn. Again, I expect another long AI generated obfuscation - that will only continue to show everyone reading along exactly what’s happening here. Thank you again 💚