Monsieur Tottenham

@footballconfid1 Ramon Vega

Question: Next Spurs Manager? WRONG ANSWERS ONLY…

@hotspurreports No

Does anyone want Tim Shirwood to return to the club, to try keep us up? 👀

@talkSPORT Oh what a coincedence

ANOTHER one?! 😱

@Don_Falcone2 Today it is

Tudor is gone tomorrow isn’t he?

@FabrizioRomano Cheats

🚨⚠️ Arsenal midfielder Martin Zubimendi leaves Spain camp due to knee discomfort, statement confirms. He won’t play against Egypt. ❌🇪🇸

Trump in 2008: Anyone who invades the Middle East under false pretenses should be impeached. Let’s make sure it goes viral here.

@FabrizioRomano Will they skipp the world cup to for medicl assessment?

🚨 Declan Rice and Bukayo Saka leave England camp for “medical assessment”. John Stones and Noni Madueke also return to clubs due to injury Aaron Ramsdale, Fikayo Tomori, Adam Wharton, Dominic Calvert-Lewin have left the camp too.

@TirthRajSharma5 @Microinteracti1 Good for european economy…

@Microinteracti1 This assumes Europe stays dependent. If the U.S. exits NATO, Europe won’t stop spending—they’ll just spend elsewhere or build their own industry. The demand doesn’t disappear, the supplier changes💥

If America Leaves NATO, the Bill Lands in Washington “NATO wasn’t there for us. We send billions of dollars to them every year to protect them. We would have always been there for them. But based on their actions, I guess we don’t have to be, do we? Why would we be there for them if they’re not there for us?” That argument sounds airtight. It also gets almost everything backwards. The Industrial Logic No One Wants to Say Out Loud. For decades, NATO membership has functioned as the world’s most effective arms sales platform. When a country joins the alliance, it buys American. F-35s, Patriot batteries, HIMARS, Javelins. It becomes structurally dependent on American spare parts, software updates, and maintenance contracts. It is the most sophisticated captive market in military history. Poland alone devotes 4.7 percent of its GDP to defense. These are not abstract trade figures. They are jobs in Fort Worth, Orlando, and East Hartford. They are the economic foundation of entire congressional districts. A US exit from NATO does not preserve this arrangement. It ends it. Canada and Portugal have already signaled reservations about F-35 commitments worth up to $19 billion, citing political unpredictability in Washington. When two countries walk away from an American platform, others begin running the same calculation. EU member states spent 343 billion euros on defense in 2024, a 19 percent rise from the year before. The political momentum behind “Buy European” is real and growing. The market will remain. NATO gives the United States something no defense budget line can purchase: forward positioning, intelligence integration, and political legitimacy across 30 countries. These are the operating system of American global influence.Without them, the United States becomes alone. The Indo-Pacific pivot is not wrong on its merits. But forward positioning in Europe is not a drain on Pacific readiness. It is the network that makes global power projection coherent. Cut one node and the whole system degrades. The Quiet Withdrawal Already Underway. A formal exit has not happened. But the functional retreat is well advanced. The Trump administration has told European allies the US will no longer serve as NATO’s primary conventional defense provider after 2027. Joint force commands are being transferred to European generals. Intelligence-sharing arrangements built over decades are being quietly renegotiated. Each move is individually defensible. Collectively, they produce the same outcome as a formal withdrawal, without the legal fight or the Senate vote. The irony is considerable. The administration that views NATO as a bad deal for America is dismantling the mechanism that made American arms exports dominant in global defense markets. The alliance was never just a security arrangement. It was the most durable commercial advantage in the history of the defense industry. So back to the question. Why would America be there for allies who aren’t there for America? Because “there for us” included $343 billion in European defense spending flowing toward American suppliers. It included 30 countries hosting American bases and intelligence networks. It included the political architecture that let Washington call itself the leader of the free world and have other governments agree. Not a subsidy to Europe. A return on investment that took 75 years to build. The bill for dismantling it will not arrive in Brussels. It will arrive in Fort Worth.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

@EricLDaugh Trump is a moron

🚨 HOLY CRAP. President Trump just said America no longer has to be there for NATO "We WOULD have always been there for them, but now, based on their actions? I guess we don't have to be, do we?!" "I think a tremendous mistake was when NATO just wasn't there. They just weren't there. It's going to make a lot of money for the United States, because we spent hundreds of billions of dollars a year on NATO, hundreds, protecting them." Trump NEVER FORGETS.

Schrödinger's Trump

@markraymond @atrupar How on earth did more than half of americans think it was a good idea to put this moron in the White House?

@atrupar Huh? He accepted a $400 million jet from Qatar, billions of dollars in crypto bribes, and CEOs have to show up in his office to hand him gold trophies with his name engraved on them to get tariff exemptions. He's the most corrupt president in American history.

Trump: "Can I look at that tractor? I assume it's a gift to me. Can you imagine if I accepted that, what they would do? A Democrat could accept, we're not allowed to accept."

@Madders10 @iamsanjaypatel @YouTube We need you.. you can keep us up

Session 6 months post ACL surgery. Working hard to be back 💪🏼Video of what it looks like out on Sunday at 6pm on my @youtube channel 🎥 (link in bio)

@TheLocalYidiot @premierleague @FA_PGMOL @SkySportsNews We conceded or had goals withdrawn due to simulation

This would never happen in the @premierleague because VAR, @FA_PGMOL and @SkySportsNews are all corrupt

Motherwell midfielder Callum Slattery has been handed a four-game ban, two of which are suspended, for simulation which resulted in a red card for St Mirren defender Richard King. #BBCFootball

@ajb_79 @Matt280994 Wooooah Teddy Teddy Love this from him. Where’s all the others who used to have a go at fans who criticised the board and club? They all seel to be hiding now it’s all goung south

Sheringham is doing what all of the other supposed legends of the club should be doing and using his voice. Would be good if the others followed suit and called the club out for the shambles it is #thfc

@adamdnathan @JaiP72 Most certainly if they knew he wanted to go after this season and need to replace him. Now they’ll know we’re in desperate need for a GK so ask for ridiculous prices probably

Again though, what the fuck were the hierarchy doing in January to resolve it? If we go down, a portion of blame will be on Vicario, for having an awful season. Turns out, not a huge surprise if he’s been injured for months! So why didn’t they sign someone?!

Are you watching @SpursOfficial enic and our board would never… #enicout

🚨💣 Coventry City owner Doug King has confirmed the club will fully honour the special Premier League package purchased by fans back in 2023. That package locked in frozen ticket prices for five years and promised a free season ticket for the club’s first year back in the top flight if promotion was achieved. With the Sky Blues now on the brink of returning to the Premier League, the 5,000 loyal supporters who bought the package will receive their free season tickets next season. Away tickets capped at £30 means they’ll see every single game — home and away — for just £570. 😍 A brilliant gesture to reward the fans who backed the club early! 👏

@Spurspapers Yep

City get deducted 60 points meaning Spurs stay up. But hands Arsenal the title. Do we take that 👀