I AM DISCLOSURE

@OMApproach Thank you for reinforcing the point I’ve been trying to communicate.

Since there is little interest in these kinds of posts, I’ll be brief. It is not a coincidence that J. Allen Hynek was appointed to head Project Blue Book. He was a Rosicrucian, and it is also not a coincidence that the symbols reported on UAPs are ancient and alchemical, symbols that form the core of secret societies. So if a Rosicrucian saw the alchemical symbol for amalgam on a UAP, it is obvious why he would change it to something else. Amalgam is central to transmutation and transformation, whether internal and spiritual or external and material. They don't want disclosure!

Something that would help you understand Thomas Townsend Brown’s asymmetric capacitor more precisely is this: “asymmetric” does not refer to a simple spatial gap between two electrodes. It refers to a structural imbalance in their geometry and field distribution. The electrodes must be deliberately unequal in shape and curvature so that the electric field cannot distribute uniformly. For example, a more proper asymmetric capacitor must be formed as a cone or triangular structure, with the positive electrode concentrated at the tip, while the negative electrode is positioned across the flat base. This configuration forces charge density to concentrate at the tip and spread across the base, creating a steep electric field gradient directed along the axis of asymmetry. The field is not uniform; it is compressed at one end and diffuse at the other, which establishes a directional bias in how energy propagates through the system. That gradient enables the formation and propagation of surface-bound electromagnetic modes, specifically Surface Plasmon Polaritons, which travel along the interface as transverse oscillations. These oscillations are perpendicular to the direction of propagation, meaning the energy transfer occurs in a transverse wave structure rather than a purely longitudinal one. Gravitational waves are also transverse in their mode of propagation, meaning their oscillations occur perpendicular to their direction of travel. To reinforce and amplify this behavior, three additional time-varying magnetic field inductors can be arranged around the cone in an orthogonal configuration, each separated by 60 degrees, forming an anti-Helmholtz-like arrangement. This geometry imposes opposing field gradients that do not cancel but instead reinforce directional asymmetry, producing an intensified, structured transverse electric field that behaves analogously to focused gravitational waves.

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

@DocAlienista A commonly overlooked detail in this video is that the bottom section rotates in the opposite direction.

🚨👽 Avistamiento OVNI, en el 2000, excelente filmación, aún no había IA, así que no vamos a desacreditar éste metraje👍

Do you really think that's going to happen? I mean, seriously. Are you honestly going to tell me that the U.S. government is going to listen to Trump or Congress regarding releasing ET information, when they have already concluded that there is no evidence of extraterrestrial involvement? They would have to backpedal everything they said, including all the documents they repeatedly denied. It would ruin their entire credibility. Even the richest, most powerful, and most influential people on Earth don't have the strength to pry open this can of worms. I'm sorry, but you and everyone else who keeps talking about wanting it to happen are not going to make it happen by brute force. To have power in this field, you can't just expect people to hand you things because you think we deserve it; you need to earn it by recognizing what is actually real and what is not. And unfortunately for you and the rest of the ufology journalist community, that's not possible with your current state of mind. You're all playing it safe by not risking your stance to claim something that you think may be false. And that's the cycle of distinction: you don't know what's real and what isn't, and you're just spectating and demanding. It doesn't work like that, and it never will. You need to stand up for your beliefs, take risks, and make claims. I, on the other hand, claim these beings are extraterrestrial, they come from the Orion constellation, they are electrostatic in nature, they communicate using electrogenesis via electroreception and magnetoreception. They use MHD field propulsion, and they mostly come from water worlds. Those are big claims and big risks because I make those claims boldly and unapologetically, but it is a stance I stick to and know is the truth. Their entire physics is based on electrical motor principles because it electrically leads to Kerr-Newman black hole physics. You may have all the influence and notoriety in this field, but you are agnostic for the truth. And that makes you powerless.

ESTIMATE OF THE SITUATION Because what happens next matters more than most of us acknowledge. These craft have been with us since the beginning of recorded human history. We called them UFOs. Now we call them UAP. The name has changed. Their presence has not. WHAT STEPS MUST HAPPEN FOR DISCLOSURE? There is one path forward. Four steps. Each step, a decade overdue. The foundation everything else must be built upon: EARNEST, RADICAL HONESTY to the American people, and to the world. 1. FORMAL ADMISSION OF THE KNOWN FACTS 2. FORMAL ADMISSION OF THE UNKNOWNS 3. FORMAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE UAP PRESENCE & REALITY [That we are not alone. That we never have been] 4. FORMAL ARTICULATION OF THE PRELIMINARY DEFINITIONS, DETERMINATIONS, AND GLOBAL DEFENSE CONCERNS THAT CAUSED THE SECRECY IN THE FIRST PLACE Once we explain WHY it was hidden, the reasoning, the fear, the calculus made by those who came before us - we can finally begin to move FORWARD together, toward our shared future. The future of humanity itself. WHAT'S THE VERY FIRST MOVE? Release all scientific data and corroborative visual evidence of UAP that doesn't directly endanger national security. Start there.

Houses and rooms are full of perfumes—the shelves are crowded with perfumes, I breathe the fragrance myself and know it and like it, The distillation would intoxicate me also, but I shall not let it. The atmosphere is not a perfume—it has no taste of the distillation—it is odorless, It is for my mouth forever—I am in love with it, I will go to the bank by the wood and become undisguised and naked, I am mad for it to be in contact with me. The smoke of my own breath, Echoes, ripples, buzz’d whispers, love-root, silk-thread, crotch and vine, My respiration and inspiration, the beating of my heart, the passing of blood and air through my lungs, The sniff of green leaves and dry leaves, and of the shore and dark-color’d sea-rocks, and of hay in the barn, The sound of the belch’d words of my voice loos’d to the eddies of the wind, A few light kisses, a few embraces, a reaching around of arms, The play of shine and shade on the trees as the supple boughs wag, The delight alone or in the rush of the streets, or along the fields and hill-sides, The feeling of health, the full-noon trill, the song of me rising from bed and meeting the sun. Have you reckon’d a thousand acres much? have you reckon’d the earth much? Have you practis’d so long to learn to read? Have you felt so proud to get at the meaning of poems? Stop this day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of all poems, You shall possess the good of the earth and sun, (there are millions of suns left,) You shall no longer take things at second or third hand, nor look through the eyes of the dead, nor feed on the spectres in books, You shall not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me, You shall listen to all sides and filter them from your self. The past and present wilt—I have fill’d them, emptied them, And proceed to fill my next fold of the future. Listener up there! what have you to confide to me? Look in my face while I snuff the sidle of evening, (Talk honestly, no one else hears you, and I stay only a minute longer.) Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.) I concentrate toward them that are nigh, I wait on the door-slab. Who has done his day’s work? who will soonest be through with his supper? Who wishes to walk with me? Will you speak before I am gone? will you prove already too late?

SOON🚨Fresh Freedom Episode 66 - The Hidden Power Structure Behind UAP Disclosure w/ @UAPGERB

#ufo #uap #ovni #nhi #disclosure #ufox #uapx Ufology becomes coherent only when higher-order communication is treated as structured and continuous, expressed through patterns long embedded in Biblical foundations; interpretation evolves, but its base does not, and as conditions change, cognition must update to close what remains unresolved. Abstractions organize perceived complexity, yet coherence depends on continuity, and each constructed layer rests on a base aligned with simplicity. Any apparent incompleteness resolves when prior and emerging modes of thought are integrated into a single, evolved rationalization.

#ufo #uap #ovni #nhi #disclosure #ufox #uapx When the drive for disclosure reaches necessity, understanding follows.

There is no proof of it being a fact because there is no alleged evidence of extraterrestrial involvement and no way for historians to cross-reference what they believe to be untrue. However, I have extensively studied these symbols as electromagnetic coil geometries, as has Mark R. Tomion, and the conclusions are undeniable: the patterns align in perfect unison with established physics and propulsion principles. Do not mistake my inference for arrogance or dogmatism. Treat me the same way you would for the works of liftingthelamp, a symbologist, and cross-disciplinary researcher attempting to educate the broader audience on concepts that they do not yet fully understand, to clarify what many currently regard as mere speculation.

Thank you for this thoughtful reply, however, I don’t think there has been any definitive proof of what you’re saying here. No issue with what you think, it’s a super interesting perspective, and I’m all for the inherent connection between esoteric traditions to the electromagnetic nature of physical reality, which I have covered extensively on the show, but stating your position as an undeniable fact is just as much an opinion as someone claiming the same in reverse.

Aliens or Spiritual Beings?… @liftingthelamp #esotericism #UFOs #magic #InvisibleCollege #TheTLBPod

@maniaUFO Big yes!

Mysterious 2,000-Year-Old Disco Colgante - Unknown High-Tech Device...🧐🤔 The 2,000-year-old Disco Colgante is an object that was produced for unknown reasons, or at least it seems so to us, modern humans. Was it an ancient tool, a high-tech device, ritual artifact or does it offer evidence of our ancestors’ vast knowledge of astronomy?

According to the source this is a photo of the UFO recovered by the CIA in Zimbabwe in 1974.🧐🤔

Please, Mr. Eric Burlison...don't be so naive. NASA, the AEC, and ONI are co-partners in unacknowledged programs to conceal and recover ETI craft. Please brush up on the Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA, which I recommended to Mr. Jesse Michels, to which he made a video about it months later. Science as we know it has been seeded from alchemical/hermetic/angelic symbols which have been around for thousands of years with every known scientist in pre-modern era studying their implications. The Philosopher's Stone: liquid mercury and sulfur to transform metals. Do you think the helical rods below the pyramid of Giza is a mere coincidence? Do you think it is a coincidence that the archaeologists in Teotihuacan discovered liquid mercury in an underground tunnel beneath the Temple of the Feathered Serpent? Do you think it is a coincidence that the ET from the Herbert Schirmer UFO incident had a winged serpent symbol on their suits? Do you think Vimana having a liquid mercury vortex engine is a coincidence? Do you think that Michael Herrera's encounter with a pyramid shaped craft is a coincidence? Is it a coincidence that the interior geometry of the Pantheon in Rome matches the external geometry of Herrera's pyramid-shaped craft, with the central oculus resembling the vortex core of a Vimana? You simply don't know your own history.

From my experience, I can believe that NASA doesn’t know anything on UAPs/UFOs. Why would the intelligence community tell NASA ANYTHING? Their mission is science. It isn’t national security. They work and cooperate with foreign governments. There is no-way that they are trusted with critical intelligence.

🚨 Rep Tim Burchett says NASA is lying when they say they have nothing on UFOs "NASA saying 'we don't have anything, we don't study this'... I've been in meetings with them where they've told me they studied it and they have stuff that's classified that they can't share with the public."

@jamescfox All you ufology journalists are wasting precious time in doubt against the pushback. Help me help you understand.

This is very concerning — very.

Helicity is the direction a particle’s spin points relative to the direction it moves: spin aligned with motion is positive helicity, and spin opposite the motion is negative helicity. In graviton scattering, amplitudes are organized by the helicities of the participating gravitons. A single-minus amplitude means one graviton has negative helicity while all others have positive helicity. Standard results said these amplitudes vanish, implying the interaction probability is zero. The new result shows this is only true for generic momenta; when particle momenta align in a special half-collinear configuration, the cancellation fails and a nonzero amplitude appears. openai.com/index/extendin…

Thy speak as though all things settled, As though the world were softly known. I say some truths refuse all language, And some demand to stand alone. Not all is meant for grasp or naming, Not all dissolves in doubt or play. There is a line the mind must walk Where wonder sharpens into way. The world is not a simple contrast, Nor chaos dressed as choice or chance. It moves by laws unseen but fixed, And shame to chase without a glance. I see the board. I see the rules. I see how ignorance is fed. And I will not mistake belief For certainty that must be bled. In sphere kept with twists of fate, By fear and sanctioned blame; The cycle must take the poles to bend, And see the turn before the claim. With all the force my reasons hold, I press forward with reminiscence— Not to escape by blind refusal, But to be, or not to be complacent, I lean against the latter end— Not seeking shelter in denial, But placing truth as it was meant, For all to reprimand or unravel.

@LueElizondo I'm thankful for realizing the extraterrestrial species, their propulsion technology, where they're located here, their planet/habitat/biology/evolution, and how they shaped our religious history on Earth, without depending on anyone to validate it for me. I know it for myself.

Ask yourself this…what are you thankful for? As for me, I am thankful for a healthy family, good friendship, and all of you. Let’s not forget those who are not with family this holiday season and let’s be generous with those who have less. God bless you all and Happy Thanksgiving.

I expected more from you, James. A documentary built around the exclusivity of government officials or insiders doesn’t make the conversation more credible. Even with their presence, the material being presented is the same set of claims the field has been hearing for years. Nothing here is new. It’s the same story, just repackaged. It shows a lack of real investigative effort. It falls into the same pattern that has kept ufology stuck for decades: officials repeating familiar anecdotes, officials backing each other up, and audiences being handed recycled claims without a single step toward genuine clarity. There’s no deeper analysis, no attempt to dig, and no curiosity driving the discussion forward. For people who genuinely want real disclosure, this kind of work holds everyone back. Rather than pushing the subject into new territory, it slips right back into the same loop that has already played out across countless documentaries, interviews, podcasts, and online discussions. Every point has been public for years, and often explored elsewhere with more detail and honesty. The Age of Disclosure disrespects the audiences intelligence by pretending that old material is somehow revelatory and that viewers won’t notice the repetition, and won’t question the lack of substance. That attitude lowers the bar for what counts as meaningful, discourages real scrutiny, and keeps the entire topic trapped in place. The documentary offers no new perspective, no insight, and nothing that pushes understanding forward. Instead of raising the standard, it reinforces the idea that ufology is defined by recycling the same claims over and over again and in doing so, it further weakens a subject that deserves far more seriousness and respect than what’s being offered. James, I get that you’re trying to get close with other ufology documentary filmmakers, but that kind of familiarity can’t be allowed to blur judgment. This topic requires real seriousness, not automatic support for anything produced within the same circle. Boosting something just because a new friend made it, especially when it contains nothing new, doesn’t move the field forward. It lowers the standard, and ultimately reinforces the same shallow patterns the subject is already struggling to outgrow. I’m not trying to discourage disclosure. I want it as much as much as you do, probably even more. But the only way to get there is by moving the conversation forward, not by amplifying the same stories like a loudspeaker. What the field needs isn’t more conformity, it needs growth and depth. The documentary’s use of the term “warp bubble” illustrates this failure directly. That label should be replaced with what it actually refers to: field propulsion, because calling it a “warp bubble” oversimplifies the physics to the point of misunderstanding. It tries to sound sophisticated, yet it offers no reasoning or mechanism that would justify it as a serious explanation of how a field-based propulsion system would function. Instead, it just appears scientific while avoiding the deeper questions of how a craft manipulates its surrounding environment, what physical fields are being shaped, how momentum exchange is achieved. A real discussion of advanced propulsion must confront field dynamics head-on: the energy distribution, the directional asymmetry, the medium interaction, the source of acceleration, and the observable signatures produced during operation. These are the deeper questions people are seeking. Promote those kinds of people, people who actually touch on substance that helps bring understanding forward, not promoting regurgitated content.

EVERYONE in the worlds really truly needs to watch @ageofdisclosure, directed & produced by @dan_farah, right now. This BOMBSHELL and UNPRECEDENTED documentary IS NOTHING SHORT OF DISCLOSURE. It interviews 34 senior U.S. Government officials and undeniably reveals an 80-year global cover-up of non-human intelligent life & the profound stakes for humanity. This is a WATERSHED MOMENT for humanity. We need to make sure all our friends & family watch this film and collectively demand further disclosure from the President. WATCH it now worldwide on @primevideo or in theaters in NYC / LA / DC. #ageofdisclosure