JN 🇿🇦

25.6K posts

JN 🇿🇦 banner
JN 🇿🇦

JN 🇿🇦

@UnityInSA

Speak the truth. Be objective.

Johannesburg, South Africa شامل ہوئے Aralık 2017
4.1K فالونگ2.4K فالوورز
JN 🇿🇦 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Abier
Abier@abierkhatib·
Shout it loud, Luke 📣
English
177
2.1K
5.1K
43.5K
JN 🇿🇦 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 WATCH: Keir Starmer’s calls with Donald Trump are mocked in the launch of Saturday Night Live UK #SNLUK
English
376
2K
12K
896.3K
JN 🇿🇦 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Shadow of Ezra
Shadow of Ezra@ShadowofEzra·
Dan Bongino is told to his face that "he's a pedophile protector." "You're a pedophile protector."
English
570
3K
18.7K
351.3K
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
BREAKING 🚨 South Korean Military just said they will AID America in reopening the Strait of Hormuz “In honor of their long-standing Alliance” THIS IS HUGE 🔥
English
408
3.2K
22.5K
215.3K
JN 🇿🇦 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Murray 🇺🇸
Murray 🇺🇸@Rothbard1776·
WSJ: “According to anonymous US officials, Iran fired two missiles towards Diego Garcia”. Did they hit it? Well … no. One missile failed completely and the other didn’t make it. Epstein media class: “Iran just proved their missiles can strike from 4000 km!! We told you so!!”
GIF
English
64
103
395
7.1K
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
@marlene4719 It would be interesting to see who reported first on this missile attack on Diego Garcia.
English
0
0
2
56
Marlene Robertson🇨🇦
It’s almost unimaginable for me to admit but I take the word of Iran over that of the United States. Just more of the Trump effect.
Marlene Robertson🇨🇦 tweet media
English
131
415
1.1K
13.3K
JN 🇿🇦 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Shawn Wenzel
Shawn Wenzel@shawnwenzel·
@Rothbard1776 Iran hasn't denied hitting Diego Garcia. The part I question: how do we know both missiles didn't hit? Would the US military readily admit if they did?
English
30
0
15
3.1K
Murray 🇺🇸
Murray 🇺🇸@Rothbard1776·
How to Identify War Propaganda 101: Who was the outlet who initially released the report on Iran supposedly firing missiles toward Diego Garcia? Who owns the Wall Street Journal? What are their connections and motivations? Start there. Next, analyze the content of the report. Does it provide adequate details or evidence to support the claims being made by those sharing the report? Keep in mind, the report hasn’t been confirmed. However, even if the report is accurate, here are some starting points: Did the missiles actually have the capability to reach Diego Garcia? We know from the report that one of the missiles failed entirely and that the US refused to comment on what supposedly happened to the other missile. So let me ask what should be an obvious question: if 1 (or 50%) of the missiles that were launched completely failed, and the report doesn’t provide any evidence or details on the effectiveness, capability, accuracy or result of the other missile that was launched (besides the fact that we know it didn’t reach Diego Garcia) … then how can any honest person suddenly claim Iran has effectively demonstrated this increased capability that no one knew about? Finally, observe the individuals who are part of the coordinated astroturf media campaign. What are their motivations and policy positions? Who do they work for? What is their track record of being accurate and honest? Finally, you need to consider the timing of a report like this in the context of the current state of the war or conflict itself. I hope this helps.
Murray 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
153
1.1K
2.6K
88.7K
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
@AJENews This seems like a false flag incident. Whoever reported on this incident first, probably created the false flag.
English
0
0
1
108
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
@UnityNewsNet It would be interesting to see if X sleuths can figure out who reported on this incident first, as that would indicate who created the false flag.
English
0
0
3
96
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
Classic false flag incident. It it was Iran, they would have splashed the news on social media just after they shot those missiles. But in this case, there was nothing from Iran. It would be interesting to see who reported first on the Diego Garcia missile attack. (if there was actually an attack in the first place).
English
0
3
10
454
Anonymous
Anonymous@YourAnonCentral·
Iran says it was not responsible for the missile attacks on Diego Garcia and denied any involvement. If it wasn't Iran, then who was it? China, Israel, Russia, or the US trying to lure the UK into the war?
Anonymous tweet media
English
137
278
900
35.1K
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
@RT_com Investigate journalists need to check who reported first on this incident. That will give a clue as to who fired the missiles. If it was Iran, they would have spoken about the attack immediately after the attack. But in this case, there was nothing from Iran.
English
0
0
5
263
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
Reports emerging that the missiles fired on Diego Garcia could have been a false flag incident. Some are even saying that it could have been fired from an Israeli submarine. Iran says they did not fire those missiles. People need to investigate who reported the attacks first. Iran always gives warnings for its attacks. And they also comment just after the attack. They did nothing of that sort for this attack.
English
0
0
2
84
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧@TiceRichard·
I told the PM in Commons 3 weeks ago that Iran is a permanent threat to UK Now truth is out that their ballistic missile range is much longer than many believed Now even Starmer must realise that Tehran has to be properly disarmed by US and Israel telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2026/0…
English
464
495
2.3K
30.8K
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
Highly likely. It would be interesting to see who reported on this incident first. Iran almost every time reports on their attacks: before-the-attack warnings, during the attack, and after the attack. If Iran was going to attack Diego Garcia, they would have announced it as a strategic option.
English
0
0
0
140
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
@RapidResponse47 @POTUS Highly likely a false flag incident. Some reports are saying that it could have been fired from an Israeli submarine.
English
0
0
0
68
Rapid Response 47
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47·
.@POTUS (2/24/26): Iran has "already developed missiles that can threaten Europe and our bases overseas, and they're working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America." (Trump was right — again)
Brett McGurk@brett_mcgurk

Speaks for itself: Feb. 25, 2026: “We are not developing long-range missiles… we have limited the range below 2,000 kilometers” — Iran’s FM Araghchi (IRNA). March 20, 2026: Iran fires missiles at Diego Garcia—ranging 4,000 kilometers (WSJ). ⬇️

English
575
2.7K
11.3K
440.9K
JN 🇿🇦 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Retro Coast
Retro Coast@RetroCoast·
Breaking: Reports the 2 missiles fired at the US base on Diego Garcia were fired from an Israeli submarine Iran did not fire them- Israel did.
English
554
5.7K
23.5K
581K
Suppressed Voices
Suppressed Voices@supressedvoic·
When the war is over,which country would you prefer to visit? IRAN OR ISRAEL
English
832
61
685
56.7K
JN 🇿🇦
JN 🇿🇦@UnityInSA·
@stucam7771 Highly likely a false flag incident. I saw a comment where Iran said that it was not them. It would be interesting to see who first announced this incident - where did the report come from?
English
0
0
2
83
Stu Cameron
Stu Cameron@stucam7771·
Am I wrong for thinking there may be a chance that USA/Israel could be behind the missiles fired at Diego Garcia? The distance is coincidentally just far enough to reach London. This helps justify Trump’s actions and possibly bring Europe into the war Seems far fetched, but…
English
513
261
1.6K
36.3K