Valefor3

3.4K posts

Valefor3 banner
Valefor3

Valefor3

@Valefor3_

شامل ہوئے Nisan 2018
336 فالونگ101 فالوورز
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Kemi Badenoch
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch·
I don’t want to hear about Black Lives Matter. I don’t want to hear about White Lives Matter. Everyone matters. Henry Nowak matters.
English
2.7K
4.3K
39.2K
1.7M
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Andreas Wassenius
Andreas Wassenius@Wassenuss·
😂😂
QME
12
6
194
103.9K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jake Kozloski
Jake Kozloski@jakozloski·
Women are 2x more likely than men to refuse to change their style for a partner, per Keeper data. Hard no — Women: 42% | Men: 19% A few possible reads: – Style is more identity-laden for women – Men's looks carry less weight in attraction, so less to defend – Women have invested more in their wardrobe, harder to abandon Not sure which is right. Maybe a mix. What would you add?
English
33
8
149
25.3K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Y⟶ΛПKΣΣ 𓆉
Y⟶ΛПKΣΣ 𓆉@yankeedft·
White guys imitating Indians making street food. This is the funniest sh!t I’ve seen all year.
English
457
1.5K
10.3K
1.4M
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
JT
JT@jiratickets·
boomers sending DMs to AI-generated women on instagram
English
1.2K
33.2K
420.5K
8.7M
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Girl patriot 🙏 🇺🇸 🦅
Girl patriot 🙏 🇺🇸 🦅@Girlpatriot1974·
A recently rescued Ridglan Farms Beagle reacts to seeing the ocean for the first time. 🥰🐾
English
833
4.6K
38.6K
786.3K
Valefor3
Valefor3@Valefor3_·
@hallen_a Partierna kommer helt enkelt aldrig utesluta någon pga att det riskerar majoriteten i riksdagen. Så oavsett vad någon riksdagspolitiker gör nästa mandatperiod så kommer dom tillhöra partiet.
Svenska
0
0
0
21
🇸🇪 Arvid Hallén 🌻 🦆 🍁 🌪️⚡🛢️
Oaktat vad man tycker om våra politiska vildar och deras beteende är "politisk vilde" ett fantastiskt ord och begrepp. Det är unikt för Sverige och för den svenska politiken, och något att slå vakt om – även om jag hoppas att vi helt slipper vildar under nästa mandatperiod.
🇸🇪 Arvid Hallén 🌻 🦆 🍁 🌪️⚡🛢️ tweet media
Svenska
3
0
9
789
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Henrik Sjögren
Henrik Sjögren @HenrikHsjogren·
Ann Heberlein skrev härom dagen (1 maj) en krönika i Flamman och proklamerade ”I dag gör jag slut med högern”. Det påminde mig av någon anledning om detta gamla ljudklipp:
Svenska
24
16
155
10.5K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Joe Rogan Podcast News
Joe Rogan Podcast News@joeroganhq·
Trump: "I don't want to see Somalia. I don't want to see a woman [Ilhan Omar] that married her brother to get in, becomes a Congressman, and does nothing but complain… Let her go back and fix up her own country."
English
156
3.7K
41.5K
862.2K
AktieEntreprenören
AktieEntreprenören@Aktieprenoren·
Förloraren @MarkusGedda och den friåkande domaren @Mattias1989 avnjuter en god middag tillsammans med den mogne vinnaren AE på AG förra helgen. 😁🥩😋 Tyvärr höll inte ”for the record tror jag vi har den över 1000”, men tycker ändå det är en stilfull vinst med Plejd från 480->973 på ett år 😏
Svenska
5
0
85
35.7K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Clara Gold
Clara Gold@Clara_Gold·
I realized fundraising was the first time in my life I got rejected at scale. And honestly, as a woman, I was not emotionally trained for it. Before the feminists come for me, let me make my point. I think the first real arena where most people experience power, desire, status, and rejection is dating. And dating trains men brutally. A lot of men learn very early that if they want someone, they have to walk across the room, risk looking stupid, get rejected, survive it, and do it again. They learn that rejection is volume, timing, targeting. It’s a numbers game. A lot of women are trained very differently. Especially if you’re a pretty girl, you don’t usually walk into a bar looking at a guy thinking: “Can I have him?” You only think: “Do I want him?”. You don’t build your identity around shooting your shot 100 times and surviving 99 no’s. You don’t get trained to ask directly, get rejected publicly, and act normal 5 minutes later. You get trained to be “chosen”. To be impressive enough that the opportunity comes to you. And then you start building a company. And the whole paradigm changes. Suddenly, everyone can say no to you. Investors say no. Candidates say no. Customers say no. And when your rejection muscle is weak, your brain does the dumbest thing possible: it makes the “no” mean something about you. That you’re not smart enough. Not compelling enough. I think this is one of the most underrated gender differences in fundraising. Not that men are inherently better at it. But a lot of them have built thicker rejection scar tissue earlier. They know how to hear no and keep moving. They know how to make it less personal. They know how to treat it like volume, timing, targeting, iteration. I didn’t. I’ve raised 3 rounds. On the surface, the story looks great: I raised with Sequoia, OpenAI, Khosla. Woohoo. The real story is less sexy: every round wrecked me. I lost 5kg each time. I probably donated a few years of life expectancy to the cap table. Because every round, I only got 1 term sheet. One. EVERYONE else said no. And when almost everyone says no, your body does not care about the intellectually correct explanation. It only hears: Maybe they’re right. Maybe you’re not that compelling. Maybe you’re not the founder you thought you were. For a long time, I thought confidence meant learning not to take the no personally. I don’t believe that anymore. Maybe some people are built like that. I’m not. 30 years of being trained to be chosen does not turn into resilience because someone in a Patagonia vest says fundraising is a numbers game. So now I think confidence is something less glamorous. Confidence is taking the no very personally. Letting it ruin your day, losing your appetite, spiraling for hours… And still taking the next meeting. Confidence is just being bothered as f*** and not letting it make you smaller. I still don’t fully believe my own BS as I’m writing this, but I guess that’s the point. Can’t wait for the next round to find out.
English
145
85
1.5K
430.4K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Tobias Andersson
Tobias Andersson@SDTobbe·
De som nu klagar över att vi inte respekterade kvittningssystemet igår - då vi istället respekterade valresultatet och Sverige genom att stoppa 100 000 nya medborgarskap - hade inga problem med att utestänga oss. De tittade glatt på när Jimmie fick rulla in en ledamot.
Tobias Andersson tweet media
Svenska
78
191
1.5K
46.1K
Max Marchione
Max Marchione@maxmarchione·
The cost of sequencing a human genome dropped from $100M to less than $100 in about 25 years. That's a million-fold decrease, which outpaces even Moore's Law. We're about to enter the era of personalized medicine.
Max Marchione tweet media
English
102
452
2.5K
643.1K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
ZXX
4.1K
15.4K
91.5K
32.4M
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jeff Bezos
Jeff Bezos@JeffBezos·
ZXX
11.5K
14.5K
203.6K
19.2M
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Ivar Arpi
Ivar Arpi@Ivarpi·
ZXX
14
16
361
44K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
“We'll have universal high income. We're basically just issuing money to people, and just because the output of Business Services will so far exceed the money supply, that effectively you have deflation, because deflation is just the ratio of the outputs of goods and services to the money supply. If the rate of growth of goods and services exceeds the rate of growth of the money supply, which I predict will happen, then you will have deflation.” - Elon Musk
English
2K
2.3K
8.6K
1.5M
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Dominik Tarczyński MEP
Dominik Tarczyński MEP@D_Tarczynski·
Rapes: 2000: 🇬🇧 England & Wales: 8,593 🇩🇪 Germany: 8,133 🇫🇷 France: 7,500 🇵🇱 Poland: 2,399 2023: 🇬🇧 England & Wales: 68,109 🇩🇪 Germany: 39,029 🇫🇷 France: 42,400 🇵🇱 Poland: 1,127 No ismalists - no problem. Be Like Poland! 🇵🇱
Dominik Tarczyński MEP tweet media
English
516
6.7K
24.9K
615.1K
Valefor3 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Tom Elliott
Tom Elliott@tomselliott·
Warren Buffett vs. the @federalreserve: “I wish they had a 0% inflation target … once you start saying you’re going to tolerate 2%, that compounds pretty dramatically over time. “And you’re saying to people, if you’re getting less than 2% on your money, you’re going backwards”
English
81
297
3K
353.8K