
B L A D E R U N N E R
45.6K posts

B L A D E R U N N E R
@WIZDOMETRY
We are men, and our lot in life is to learn and to be hurled into inconceivable new worlds. G-NOSTICISM #COB | #GVE | #TRW | #4BK👁 Follow the wise rabbit 🐇















the skyfall 🌊


the skyfall 🌊


To be honest, despite all the controversy, negativity, chaos, and constant noise surrounding Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan and despite the many rumors and allegations, I can acknowledge something with intellectual honesty. I have disagreed with Andrew on certain views and positions. I have openly spoken against some of his perspectives, opinions, political stances (which lately have been shifting), his edgy racial humour and pointed out a few other things like whether he is a controlled opposition or not... I've even made threads about how his version of escaping the Matrix is a distortion and a distraction from the true path of liberation.. Though at the same time, I have also supported and agreed with many of his core principles: • Mental fortitude • Psychological resilience • Discipline • Self-responsibility • Understanding and respecting the fundamental differences between men and women • Finacial literacy • The importance of masculinity and personal development in all realms of human endeavour Whether people like it or not, it cannot be denied that Andrew and his brother Tristan have influenced millions of people to start questioning their weaknesses, improve themselves, and take more responsibility for their lives. They’ve highlighted uncomfortable truths about modern complacency, weakness, and lack of direction and that has pushed many toward self-improvement. That, in itself, is a net positive. You don’t have to agree with everything someone says to recognize where they’re right. You don’t have to idolize someone to acknowledge their positive impact or recognise When credit is due, credit is due. Intellectual honesty requires the ability to hold both critique and acknowledgment at the same time – without ego, without bias, without blind loyalty, and without blind hatred. That’s called discernment.



Andrew Tate Video Leak: 📹 The release of the controversial video coincided with Andrew Tate’s appearance on Big Brother in 2016. This timing is suspiciously conspicuous, as it guaranteed maximum exposure and effectively amplified his public profile, whether positively or negatively. Even though the video cast him in a negative light, it generated significant publicity. In today’s media landscape, negative attention can often translate into heightened recognition and influence, which raises questions about whether the incident was purely accidental. The act of recording such a video in the first place is puzzling. If consensual, why preserve footage that could so easily be weaponized against him later? This contradiction suggests either naivety, indifference to risk, or a deliberate awareness that such material might serve a future purpose. The origin of the leak remains undisclosed. While The Sun was the first outlet to publish the tape, the individual or group who provided it has never been identified, leaving room for speculation about hidden motives or coordinated agendas. Taken together – the timing, the publicity effect, and the ambiguity of the leak – this sequence of events creates the impression that Mr. Tate may not simply have been a victim of exposure. It is possible he was complicit or that he is serving a larger role as a constructed public figure, potentially aligned with hidden powers, agendas, or interests. It’s also worth noting that the infamous Tate brothers were released from prison on March 31st, the very same date The Matrix premiered in 1999. Coincidentally – or perhaps not – I was also born on March 31st. This convergence of dates raises the question: Are there truly no coincidences, or was Morpheus wrong after all ? I find it extremely interesting that no one else has noticed this. Perhaps Mr. Tate is not simply a pawn in someone else’s game but a mastermind executing a carefully calculated plan. Or is he ? I approach these questions as a natural deep thinker – critical, discerning, and open to every possibility. Yet I remain unattached to any single conclusion, allowing space for multiple interpretations without clinging to any of them. Leave your thoughts in the comments.


