Revo ϑς
1.1K posts

Revo ϑς
@YourLocalNecro
♥︎ Because, if you could love someone, and keep loving them, without being loved back... then that love had to be real ♥︎ Non-offending, anti-c paraphile ♥︎
at that forgotten hunter dump شامل ہوئے Ağustos 2024
175 فالونگ251 فالوورز

@YourLocalNecro Yup. Want me to dm the details? I know from first hand experience
English

Insane thing to see on my main account because I DESIGNED THIS OC
lumn@lumngelic
why is it becoming socially acceptable to start commissioning/drawing your oc in front of the MAP flag and with one billion fucking pedo dog whistles This is not okay
English

@Brookethekit Actually? Are they pro-c now? I knew them when they were anti-c
English

@YourLocalNecro Ah, I vaguely remember seeing him in Discords with her around briefly and his sona was named after an American gas station 💀🫧
English

@YourLocalNecro Wasn't that the sona of a para kid that was hanging around a certain hypnotist?
English

@YourLocalNecro I want to add that non-zoos also do a lot of things that indirectly hurt their animals with the motivation of loving them. So yes it's not just exclusive to sexual acts.
English

I'm not able to comment but yeah, I'd say they do apply. However there are some things we need to do for an animals wellbeing that they couldn't technically consent to. Like going on walks or to the vet. Both pose risk of injury, but it's necessary. 1/2
ImVeryFriendly ζ@ZooRightsMvmnt
@YourLocalNecro @zoofurloserX Do all these arguments equally apply to non-sexual pleasures? Why would sexual pleasures be any harder to tell if they want it? Or require different rules than all other pleasures?
English

@Daxter5218 @SCP_0313 All we can really do is report it to authorities, call out abusers, and fight for stricter animal protection laws. It helps some, but unfortunately doesn't stop all abuse
English

@DeckersGarden @zoofurloserX I think you're jumping to some conclusions here lol. I'm obviously not human trafficking anyone
English

@YourLocalNecro @zoofurloserX That's what you're doing. You're using animals to intimidate people's consent. That's considered human trafficking, & it's a 1st degree felony here.
English

@zoofurloserX Also, you can't just say theres other ways to communicate without listing them. 3/3
English

@zoofurloserX If a dog runs away, are they gonna know what the pound is? If they eat a jar of chocolate are they going to know its poisonous? If they have sex with a human are they going to know they cpuld get taken away? Or the risk of injury? Or any of the other risks that come from sex? 2/3
English

@DeckersGarden @zoofurloserX No, its both parties responsibility. You cant change the meaning of consent to fit what you want. The only time consent doesn't have to be informed is for safety reasons (like going to the vet for example)
English

@YourLocalNecro @zoofurloserX Being informed is your responsibility. It doesn't make animals any less consenting. You should also know what another person's consent looks like. You can't be serious about consent if you think animals change it.
English
Revo ϑς ری ٹویٹ کیا

@zoofurloserX Not to mention that animal body language is complex. What looks like a yes might actually be appeasement or a fawning behavior. The difference between an animal and a mute human is that we know human body language, and theres other ways of communicating. With an animal theres not
English

@zoofurloserX Consent is more than just the ability to say yes. Consent is informed too. An animal cannot be informed of the dangers or social/phycological consequences. Its also very easy to condition them into believing something is okay because they dont have access any other points of view
English

@SilliestCryptid Genuine question, does your therapist know you're pro-c? If so what does she think about it?
English


