Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨

55.7K posts

Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 banner
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨

Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨

@_Nescience_

Nescience شامل ہوئے Aralık 2013
983 فالونگ446 فالوورز
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Cassie Pritchard
Cassie Pritchard@hecubian_devil·
“You didn’t bend over backwards to recruit us, even though we’ve hated you for decades, and you didn’t prioritize our inclusion over competence and fitness for the job, so we had no choice but to destroy you at the public expense.” Like, fuck off lol.
Pizza@number_pizza111

On DOGE, Academia made a huge mistake by not giving the people in charge of America half the time any stake in their institution’s future. Gutting research, while bad for the nation, was smart politically, and I can’t help but see universities as partially at fault.

English
13
97
1.6K
50.4K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Joshua Reed Eakle 🗽
Joshua Reed Eakle 🗽@JoshEakle·
MAGA's commitment to "free speech" was always a smokescreen. They didn't want free speech. They wanted to weaponize the federal government to centrally plan culture with censorship and suppression. We're now at the point where they're comfortable saying the quiet part out loud.
Acyn@Acyn

FCC Chair: Trump is winning. Look at the results—PBS and NPR defunded. Joy Reid, Sleepy-Eyed Chuck Todd, Jim Acosta, John Dickerson are gone. Colbert is leaving. CBS is under new ownership, and soon enough CNN will have new ownership as well.

English
10
95
293
5.1K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Pedro L. Gonzalez
Pedro L. Gonzalez@emeriticus·
Tucker Carlson repeatedly told people in private that he hated Trump right up until he got fired from Fox and financially got into bed with the Trump family through Don Jr. Then he lied to help get a Trump elected as the anti-war candidate. Now he’s going to do it all again for JD Vance in 2028–the repulsive fraud who said that the US should “go big” in Iran instead of sticking with limited strikes. There really isn’t a worse influence on the public discussion than Tucker at this point. He feels absolutely no compunction about lying.
Decensored News@decensorednews

Tucker Carlson says Trump “probably couldn't pick a more credible person” to make a deal with the Iranians than JD Vance because Vance is “honest” and has a suitable “moral rectitude.”

English
40
372
2.4K
288.4K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
The Trump FCC sees its job quite explicitly as the destruction of all opposition. There’s no principle or virtue here. What’s being celebrated is the destruction of any liberal principle or shared value. MAGA folks can say “well we kind of feel like you did this to us, or want to do this to us” but notice that’s not a principle. “We’re violating this rule bc we think you did” is the opposite of virtue. It’s a justification for why you can violate a virtue that you still believe should apply when the shoe is on the other foot. Virtue signaling can be annoying. But it’s being replaced with the open celebration of vice and authoritarianism. Which is so much worse.
Derek Thompson tweet mediaDerek Thompson tweet media
English
33
391
1.7K
62.7K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨@_Nescience_·
"America hates Black Men, but not as much as they hate Women." Your statement, which implies that black men are somehow hated less than white women. Are you saying that your only backing for this claim is the fact that Hillary Clinton could not defeat Trump?* Because, if so, thats some really shaky ground to hold up a claim in the face of the historical evidence to the contrary. *(Kamala is neither here nor there, since she is black and we have already established that black women are definitely hated more than black men)
English
0
0
0
13
Chris P
Chris P@p_chris4743·
@_Nescience_ @constans @gyc Because when I was making that statement, I was making that statement in relation to the presidency itself. I mean, at least Barack Obama got elected. We've had two qualified Women defeated by a gameshow host.
English
1
1
1
8
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
constans
constans@constans·
Both Obama and Biden ran on a platform of “let’s return to normal and let bygones be bygones, because republicans deep down just want to move beyond partisanship” It’s been the Dem message for almost *20 years*. And no Dems even want to pretend to believe it anymore
Cole Sandick🌹🇵🇸🇺🇦🇸🇩@ColeSandick

This glorious Garland bashing from a normie Dem, Pritzker’s Project 2029 and the rise of Newsomism makes the prospect of a post-norms Democratic Party feel exhilaratingly likely. It’s a huge deal—even a moderate president could be far better than Biden if they ditch the norms.

English
343
379
4.8K
769.6K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
C-Bo the Eggman
C-Bo the Eggman@CBoTheEggman·
When you look at Trump’s second term through the lens of Trump wanting to get revenge upon America for not re-electing him in 2020, along with being in Putin and Netanyahu's debt (or blackmail), everything he's done makes sense.
Rushi@rushicrypto

I don't know who still needs to hear this, but Donald Trump is intentionally leading the world to a devastating global recession that will last a decade minimum, all the while gaslighting the American people, while manipulating world markets and profiting off the outcomes. It really is as simple as that.

English
11
422
3.1K
76.5K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jason,
Jason,@jasonc_nc·
Promise: cheap gas Outcome: expensive gas Promise: lower rates Outcome: higher rates Promise: reduce inflation Outcome: increasing inflation Promise: affordability Outcome: massive tax on consumer goods, groceries, material inputs Promise: more manufacturing jobs Outcome: negative 100k and counting Promise: stop interventionism in foreign countries Outcome: constant interventionism in foreign countries Promise: strong family farms Outcome: Down $5B in ag exports, constant taxpayer bailouts, family farms closing anyway Promise: reduce trade deficit Outcome: trade deficit increased (and we paid more) Promise: stop immigrants from “taking” American jobs Outcome: higher native born unemployment Promise: drain the swamp Outcome: huge increase in lobbyist spending, insiders are placing stock trades and kalshi bets on classified war plans
Jason, tweet media
Jason,@jasonc_nc

@AlexNoonan6 @GayBearRes This is a repeating dynamic. States a policy goal. Does something that’s mostly a gimmick and won’t really fix it. Then does another actively stupid thing that fights the stated policy goal. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.

English
1
17
62
2.5K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨@_Nescience_·
Sure, and based on those realities you could very well conclude that black women are held in lower regard than black men in American society. And I would actually fully agree with that conclusion. But that is not the case you made. You said this: "Its even more nuts to me to think that a White Woman would've had a better time of it" The implication here is that white women occupy a lower status in Americas socio-racial hierarchy than black men, which enables black men to have "a better time of it". That seems, to me, a very hard case to make. The idea that it is "nuts" to even question that case is just a truly bizarre take in my view and totally contrary to the historical expression of white supremacy within this society which, while fundamentally chauvinistic and hostile to white women, clearly privileged white people over all others (white women are, at the end of the day, white people) and assigned an intrinsic moral and spiritual value to white womanhood that could not be matched by other groups and, indeed, was often weaponized against them. To use an example illustrating the latter point, cases like Emmet Tills, in which a black male can be quickly and summarily unalived for the mere hint of a threat to a white womans honor, are not possible in a society in which white women arent viewed to be on a higher tier. That is why I asked you to back up this claim. You have actually tried to do so, which is a credit, but I really do not think this is a defensible argument. x.com/i/status/20374…
English
1
0
0
14
Chris P
Chris P@p_chris4743·
@_Nescience_ @constans @gyc I'm not negating the fact that Black Men have struggled, but let's look at the example of Black Women.Black Women didn't get the right to vote in 1866, nor could they get bank accounts themselves, buy or sell homes by themselves or reap the same benefits as Black Men.
English
1
0
0
14
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨@_Nescience_·
"freed Black men got the right to vote in 1865-66" And how did those rights hold up against the weight of segregation and Jim Crow laws (which, given black population concentration in the south, covered the vast majority of blacks)? Is there a reason we needed a Voting Rights Act in 1965?
English
1
0
0
16
Chris P
Chris P@p_chris4743·
@_Nescience_ @constans @gyc Well, freed Black men got the right to vote in 1865-66, while Women at large couldn't vote until 1920. You might have lived better, but still had no rights.
English
1
0
0
14
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨@_Nescience_·
@p_chris4743 @constans @gyc "America hates Black Men, but not as much as they hate Women." Do you genuinely believe that white women are held in lower regard in American society than black men? Has American history really reflected that?
English
1
0
0
18
Chris P
Chris P@p_chris4743·
@constans @gyc The naivete of thinking that the first Black U.S. President didn't think the GOP was fucking evil is just nuts to me. Its even more nuts to me to think that a White Woman would've had a better time of it. I mean, America hates Black Men, but not as much as they hate Women.
English
2
0
8
689
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Alex Cole
Alex Cole@acnewsitics·
Republicans can’t govern. Give them Congress and the presidency and you still have gridlock.
English
40
229
1.3K
12.7K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
GLP-1 drugs are the ultimate validation of the techno-solutionist approach to society's most challenging problems. The obesity crisis seemed liked it would just get worse and worse forever. Scolding from public health officials didn't work. Proposals to completely overhaul our food systems were dead on arrival. Instead, we invented a weekly shot (based on Gila monster venom!) that fixes obesity directly. And now, thanks to the economic incentives in our biomedical industry, we have follow-on drugs that will be cheaper, even more effective, and easier to administer (by taking a pill instead of a shot). Policymakers should be focused on figuring out how we can get more breakthrough drugs like GLP-1s (and faster). They also should think hard about which slopulist ideas might inadvertently kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
Alec Stapp tweet media
English
64
291
2.1K
188.9K
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Branche°
Branche°@Branche_SC·
- DUI hire - FBI director who got phished TWICE - Health Secretary whose whole thing has been defunding health research and telling you to drink milk - Commerce Secretary who hates any commerce from foreign countries & whose family business bets against the policy - Attorney General that protects pedophiles - Director of national intelligence that is cut out of every briefing bc she’s probably a Russian asset - Chief of Staff who gossips about her boss to newspapers Etc They’re all like this Maybe Doug Burgum doesn’t totally suck but I’ve not seen much about him, he does look like someone who enjoys… land though?
English
0
1
7
263
Nescience🇯🇲🇻🇨 ری ٹویٹ کیا
Poe's Law, Esq: Poe's Lawyer
Poe's Law, Esq: Poe's Lawyer@dyingscribe·
Two things 1. I’ve never heard anyone admit this out loud 2. That’s gotta be crazy because everyone who hangs out with him knows that he’s thinking they’re all losers
Acyn@Acyn

Trump: I hang out with losers because it makes be feel better. I hate guys that are very, very successful and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people that like to listen to my success.

English
36
183
2.6K
57.6K

دریافت کریں

@constans @gyc @p_chris4743 @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano @BillGates