hmmright

@ZelSnea “Depict” ≠ “*Based* on something real”. When coming up with these types of characters, the concept of an underage school girl is not something that only exists in fiction. Basing it off of a real concept would be basing it off of a part of reality.

@babeslore_ Youre forgetting a word. They said "real" after based on. Based on real. Theres no point talking about their height because a fake person is not a real person. Nor based on a real person. They depict no one. And loli is a slang term- it has no literal definition.

You could pull out 5 studies about how lolicon isn’t pedophilia and isn’t illegal unless it’s realistic or depicts real people and these motherfuckers won’t read SHIT AND WILL JUST CONTINUE TO CALL YOU A PEDOPHILE. Dumbasses

@ZelSnea Are people forgetting words have meanings? I’m not making a claim against “lolicons”. I’m reiterating the definitions of “based on” and “realistically depicts”, because OP claimed both are wrong, but that would go against the literal definition of a “loli”.

@ZelSnea Oh em gee, they made the claim that it’s wrong if it’s “based on” real people. In some example of “loli”, what would an animinated girl under 4ft tall, wearing a school uniform be “based on”? I’m not making any claims, i’m asking OP to clarify what “based” means to them.

@rottingravecest “Based off” ≠ “Realistic depiction”, one of these are illegal. Words have definitions for a reason, so which it is that you’re against?

@babeslore_ If it’s based off a real person it’s disgusting, not that hard to understand

@ZelSnea Whether “lolis” look realistic or not wasn’t the question. Why contradict yourself and claim realism is the limit then change it to things that are “based off” realism? Which is what I was asking from the beginning and gave an example to, hence why I mentioned “lolis” at all.

@babeslore_ There's already laws for realistic content because people can report it as assumed exploitation materials. But that's not what lolicon is. It's not even close- so you're asking a pointless hypothetical for lolicons while assuming such thing is a grey area for legal regulation

@mydoobeydoo Pretty sure the original comment just meant that just because other medias resort to drawing their underage characters in provocative positions, doesn’t mean this show has to, nor does it correlate to whether or not they’re homophobic.

Do these people think that highschoolers just don't have any erotic fantasies whatsoever until they turn 18?

@rottingravecest Clearly it must be because you didn’t answer the question. A drawing that’s realistic doesn’t make it a physical real thing, it’s still a piece of non-real/non-physical media. So why do you draw the line at realistic depictions even though they would still be fictional?

@RelaxedNinja47 @henlofrenwork @ReisaArchive Nobody is punishing you, it’s a tweet, get a grip. “You cannot create content with unhealthy themes of literal incest or pedophilia under the guise of “exploring dark themes” if the intention was to titillate and arouse instead of challenge and disgust.”

@babeslore_ @henlofrenwork @ReisaArchive So no fictional depiction of illegal or icky things? Yeah, same old pro censorship bullshit as always. 🙄 You really just cannot grasp how wrong it is to punish people for thoughts instead of actions, can you? It's morally and rationally repugnant. Also, nice goalpost move.

Quick rundown on some of the arguments made from yesterday's drama >Loli's look like children No they don't. >Being into lolicon makes you, or will make you a ped0 one day False equivalency & slippery slope. >Fiction affects reality If you're retarded. Don't agree? Block me.

@RelaxedNinja47 @henlofrenwork @ReisaArchive Reading comprehension is a must, these illegal and “icky” things have those descriptions for a reason, and sexual desire for those things should not be categorized and treated as if it’s just some freaky kink and not literally against the law.

@TheOtherJabrony You should be able to critically analyze media regardless of its real or fictional nature, without just going “welp it’s animated, must mean this piece of media should have no effect on anything ever”.

@babeslore_ Both are not real which is the point dumbass.

"If you need receipts then you can't defend yourself" ass argument. Fucking. Actual. Deficit.

@CTMT03K64 @Truthone525399 Someone having to kill npc’s in order to complete a game / gain points ect, is not the same as watching characters that look like children for the single sake of sexual pleasure. Intentions, babe.

@Truthone525399 How does that correlate to the fact you keep seeing kids in objects while others are fictional characters...as they should.

@LqWGAOErA3QkXR8 Except there HAS been outrage about Epstein and sexual abuse within religion, for the past couple of years actually. You’re amplifying online discourse and ignoring the real world efforts made, while also indirectly and hypocritically calling @RealSchlep a pedophile.

そして真のペドフィリアはエプスタイン島で、教会で、或いはBBCでアニメのエロを批判しながら裏で何人もの子供を犯していましたとさ 未だに歴史に学べない短絡主義者が大声出してるのは世界共通なんだなって

@Renscatlover_34 Except they’re not comparing them or grouping them together. They’re listing the people they do not want to interact with, what’s confusing?

Grouping proshipper in with pedophiles✌️💔

@RelaxedNinja47 @henlofrenwork @ReisaArchive That’s the thing, if you’re attracted to things that would cause harm/be illegal if actually enacted, you need mental evaluation. Not a safe space where you can disguise it with pixels and make it seem as if the initial attraction is normal.

@babeslore_ @henlofrenwork @ReisaArchive You do know that people can be sexually attracted to something yet not act upon that attraction, right? What are you attracted to? Have you lost control recently and violated anyone? 🤔

@henlofrenwork @ReisaArchive Because “enjoying” a show with those themes is different from gaining sexual attraction from it? These people aren’t “entertained” by cartoon child-like characters, they’re sexually attracted to it.

Fiction almost never becomes reality. Where are all the ppl who get upset about movies like "Saw" or "Escape Room" or TV shows like "Hannibal" and "Squid Game"? No one says, "If that entertains you, you’re a psychopath." or "Fiction like that creates serial killers." But this fiction is about torturing, murdering and eating humans. I hate this blatant hypocrisy.

@thereal_chunga Posting “memes” of this deplorable man, and retyping the same slang slop “diddy ahh epstein ahh lionmaker” or wtv tf. Y’all must’ve been real relieved when the files came out, “Phew! Maybe if I just bring up Epstein, people will stop asking why I’m attracted to pixelated kids!”

@thereal_chunga When I only take Epstein seriously when it’s time to stray away from my problematic sexual interests, but not when I make another “Diddy” joke.

@1p6p6pn @SirZparityAlt It would make more sense if the replies were responding to the point, “Pro-shippers directly support rape”. Because that’s what the post is implying, not that fan-fiction is the direct cause of the crime itself.

@babeslore_ @SirZparityAlt In response to something to kimi saying that proshippers dont have to support real rape. Meaning their response also carries the implication that proshippers should directly support rape

Yeah, Criminals are raping people because of some drawing or fanfic some random made on the internet... Brain power of a mudflap...