cafc

New ideas here, too.

@cafc___ I actually asked if anyone in the fan base wanted it a couple years ago. No takers! It’s not all bad - I’ll learn some football and you’ll learn some patent law. 😂

Decided today: Pulse Electronics v. U.D. Electronic Corp. (nonprecedential) Tech: networking connectors Law: inter partes review, claim construction, obviousness, indefiniteness, teaching away

Decided today: Gatearm Technologies v. Access Masters, et al. (nonprecedential) law: settlement agreement, consent decree, contempt, magistrate judge, design around tech: vehicle barrier gate arms pdf: cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/…

Decided today - Corus Realty Holdings, Inc. v. Zillow Group, Inc., et al. (nonprecedential) law: claim construction, prosecution history, disclaimer, expert testimony, local rules (Ninth Circuit) tech: real estate search systems pdf: cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/…

decided today - TVNGO v. LG Electronics (nonprecedential) law: indefiniteness, claim construction, pre-AIA 112 tech: smart televisions and content access devices, methods, and systems pdf: cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/…

3M Company v. Evergreen Adhesives, Inc. Decided today, nonprecedential Law: inter partes review, obviousness, expert testimony, trial procedure, incorporation by reference Tech: aerosol adhesives pdf: cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/…

Apple v. Corephonics pdf: cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/… Decided today, nonprecedential Tech: lens assemblies for mobile phone cameras Law: inter partes review, anticipation, enablement, burden of proof, obviousness, standard of review #law #patents #patentlaw

Intex Recreation Corp. v. Team Worldwide Corporation Decided yesterday; nonprecedential Tech: inflatable airbeds with integrated pump Law: inter partes review, claim construction, nonobviousness

FanDuel v. Interactive Games decided yesterday; precedential pdf: buff.ly/2Xc8ybw tech: remote gambling systems law: inter partes review, obviousness, Administrative Procedure Act

McGinley v. Luv N' Care decided today; nonprecedential pdf: buff.ly/33k8ESv tech: shampoo rinse containers for babies law: claim construction, infringement, priority, on sale bar, continuation in part

Fall Line Patents v. Unified Patents decided today; non-precedential pdf: buff.ly/3g4pqbA tech: data management systems law: real party in interest, appointments clause, constitutionality of PTAB APJ appointments, CAFC procedure and precedence

James v. J2 Cloud Services decided today; non-precedential pdf: buff.ly/30Z1NLl tech: voicemail/fax to email law: inventorship, concealment

Gensetix v Board of Regents of the University of Texas System decided today pdf: buff.ly/30IiURr tech: methods of modifying the immune system to kill cancer cells law: Eleventh Amendment, sovereign immunity, joinder, necessary party, indispensable party, licensing

Uniloc 2017 v Hulu decided today pdf: buff.ly/2ZOQZQC tech: systems for adjusting licenses for digital products law: IPR, eligibility

Alacratech v. Intel Corporation decided 2020-07-16 pdf: buff.ly/39txzEd tech: network communication methods including interfaces for managing network processing tasks law: obviousness, waiver

Western Express Bancshares v Green Dot Corporation decided 2020-07-14 non-precedential, per curiam pdf: buff.ly/2WFw2FB tech: methods of transferring funds law: eligibility, abstract ideas, waiver

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute v. ONO Pharmaceutical Co. pdf: buff.ly/2Bd1JP7 decided last Tuesday tech: methods of treating cancer law: inventorship, joint inventors, conception #patents

BookIt v Bank of America decided Tuesday (July 17th) pdf: buff.ly/2WwPT9X tech: reservation booking systems law: claim construction