Daniel Borup

1.9K posts

Daniel Borup banner
Daniel Borup

Daniel Borup

@daniel_borup

I try to do meaningful and interesting "data stuff" for sports & sometimes politics. Work Purposefully, Reflect Meaningfully, Live Joyfully.

Rochester, MN شامل ہوئے Şubat 2012
331 فالونگ221 فالوورز
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
Seems like a lot of spread in Illinois/Houston predictions: - @EvanMiya - Houston 64% - @totally_t_bomb - Houston 54% - @kenpomeroy - Houston 53% - @haslametrics - *Illinois* 53% What say ye, analytics guys? Is this a higher than normal amount of uncertainty for a top-10 game?
English
2
1
6
5.6K
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
Iowa with a gift to the foes of Mordor!
English
0
0
1
106
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
Only way to cut a pizza in March
Daniel Borup tweet media
English
0
0
2
42
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@ALionEye It has to be. I'm even wondering where it falls all time, NCAAT or otherwise.
English
1
0
2
238
Robert Rosenthal
Robert Rosenthal@ALionEye·
Then I'm calling it. If 1.55 PPP for the entire game was the 3rd-best in Tournament history, 1.97 for one half is ABSOLUTELY the single best offensive half in the history of the NCAAT. 1.97 is basically this: the other team doesn't play defense & you get a free layup every trip.
Jared Berson@JaredBerson

Illinois scored 1.55 points per possession tonight in its win over Penn. Per barttorvik.com, that’s the 3rd-highest PPP in an NCAA Tournament game over the last 18 years and the highest since Villanova scored 1.57 PPP against Miami in the 2016 Sweet 16.

English
3
8
245
31K
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@kebzach @DavidBludgen @ALionEye If the possessions were split evenly then 1.54 PPP in the 2nd half. Would have to be only 42 poss. in the 2H to get 1.97 PPP — in a game with 108 possessions, no way that happened.
English
0
0
0
20
Robert Rosenthal
Robert Rosenthal@ALionEye·
But a team could score 110 and put up 1.2 points per possession. SLU just scored 102 against Georgia and they were 1.29 PPP in the 1st half and 1.36 PPP in the 2nd half. I'm telling you, 1.97 PPP in one half is going to be very close to the NCAAT record. 28 of 33 possessions!
Mark Schnake@MarkSchnake

@ALionEye I bet some 1 seeds have outpaced that against 16’s. Back in the day, those scores felt like 110-40

English
2
1
90
11.9K
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
As best I can estimate, my entry to the Kalshi pool has roughly a 1-in-50,000 chance to win the $1M prize (assuming 10M entries). Not great, but about 200x over random chance. The $20 expected return is far outweighed by the fun of trying to figure out the best entry.
English
0
0
0
32
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@DanKapolnek Thanks! Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Just managed to get it out the door this year, hoping to make major improvements for 2027!
English
0
0
1
27
D. Robert
D. Robert@DanKapolnek·
@daniel_borup This is awesome, D. Sharing this with some friend groups.
English
1
0
0
10
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
Last day to give WYOP (Win Your Office Pool) a try! Data updated with the latest public pick data and KenPom ratings after last night's First Four results. winyourofficepool.com
English
1
0
1
61
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
For example, the all-chalk bracket has about a 1.26% chance of winning a 100-person pool with standard scoring. That's decent, but far from optimal.
Daniel Borup tweet media
English
0
0
0
83
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
Excited to launch the beta version of a long-term passion project. WYOP - Win Your Office Pool! See how likely your bracket is to win any given pool. Think a team is overrated by the analytics? With WYOP you can adjust team strength on the fly, too. winyourofficepool.com
English
1
0
1
88
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@John_Fron Absolutely. Too busy today and didn't realize what MSU moving above us meant to the sites. Greenville should have been obvious instead.
English
0
0
0
7
John Fronczak
John Fronczak@John_Fron·
@daniel_borup Curious why you'd have them in Buffalo - wouldn't that be the closest for both Michigan teams?
English
1
0
0
31
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
Final prediction for @IlliniMBB on selection Sunday: 3 seed Midwest Region Michigan (1); Iowa State (2); Alabama (4) Buffalo pod Louisville (6); First 4 (11); Penn (14)
English
1
0
2
190
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
As of this morning's bracket matrix, two valid brackets of the 1-4 seeds are perfectly balanced (sum of seeds in regions): Duke - Illinois - ISU - Vandy Mich - UConn - Purdue - Kansas 'Zona - MSU - 'Zaga - 'Bama Fla - Houston - Neb - UVA Or swap UConn/Hou and Ku/UVA
English
0
0
1
225
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@TylerCott Now you made it tougher! Right on the edge. I'd lean over but it depends heavily on the NCAAT draw. Think the kicker is that if we *do* upset Michigan (or OSU beats them), our odds to rack up 2+ wins in the BTT go way up.
English
0
0
1
215
Tyler Cottingham
Tyler Cottingham@TylerCott·
Welcome to Big Ten Tournament Friday! Illinois v Wisconsin tips off at 1:30-ish here in Chicago. The #Illini could play as few as 2 games or as many as 9 the rest of the way. I’m setting the O/U for “Number of Illinois WINS left in the season” at…3.5 Place your bets.
Tyler Cottingham tweet media
English
11
1
12
15.5K
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@TylerCott @ALionEye Just play, not win? I'd take the over - multiple paths (beat Wiscy and a 14-15 seed, or a 14-15 and a 6-7) that are each better than 50/50 IMO.
English
1
0
0
43
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@BCD123_ @RayFinkle2013 @ALionEye That's six handpicked "notable results". More objectively: NET top 50: 2-5 ATS (your 6 -Chattanooga +Xavier +ISU) NET top 100: 3-6 ATS (+Chattanooga +Duquesne) That's good sport for debate, but much too small a sample size to conclude anything meaningful.
English
0
0
2
58
Ben
Ben@BCD123_·
Ben@BCD123_

Do you favor season-long KenPom stats over what the experts in Vegas think should actually occur in a single game when incorporating momentum, injuries, and specific matchups? "Everyone said" is the media, fans, and oddsmakers - there was general consensus before most of these games on if they should be close, we should win, or we didn't haver much chance. In the Kentucky game specifically, Illinois was a 2 point favorite, and we all thought it should be a close game that could go either way. Instead, we got dog walked. Other notable results compared to Vegas's expectations (which I think largely were consistent with Illini fan expectations give or take a couple of points): - Illinois was 7.5 point favorites against Loyola and lost by 13 in a game we trailed essentially the entire game. - Illinois was an 8 point favorite against Chattanooga and won by 1 point after trailing for much of the game thanks to a fortunate late push. - Houston closed as a 3 point favorite and wiped us off the floor winning by 15. - UConn was admittedly the better team and 8 point favorites but won by 25. - Arkansas closed as 2.5 point favorites and beat us by 10 in a game that wasn't as competitive as the final score looked. This is six instances of what I am describing - results that don't align with expectations. The one exception to this is probably the most important win of BU's tenure where he beat ISU by 3 as a 2.5 point dog. Literally every NCAA tournament game against a team better than an 11 seed we have significantly underperformed consensus expectations except one game. I don't know how you look at those numbers (as opposed to KenPom and all the "advanced analytics" which keep saying we should win games we lose) and don't also come to the conclusion that we have underperformed expectations in the tournament. --- One can be both appreciative of sustained relevance while also very frustrated with underperforming when it matters most. This is why I refute claims that say "Illinois fans would be mad if we made the elite eight every year but never went further". If we played 2024 UConn every year and were 8 point dogs and consistently lost by 8, that would be one thing, but instead...

QME
1
0
0
96
Robert Rosenthal
Robert Rosenthal@ALionEye·
Again, these same criticisms were levied against Lou Henson and, yes, Bill Self when he was here. It's a function of the fans of 30 programs screaming "Elite 8 or this season was a bust!" Every year, 22 of them can claim "this coach always comes up short" because math can be so elusive. That disconnect is what allows you to say "have appeared so wildly outmatched against all but the worst few opponents". So let's stick with the numbers. Using KenPom ratings for the opponents... 2020: Tournament canceled 2021: Beat #158 Drexel, lost to #10 Loyola 2022: Beat #67 Chattanooga, lost to #2 Houston 2023: Lost to #22 Arkansas 2024: Beat #116 Morehead State, beat #88 Duquesne, beat #8 Iowa State, lost to #1 UConn 2025: Beat #43 Xavier, lost to #16 Kentucky The only game where Illinois was favored and lost: Loyola. The only game where Illinois was an underdog and won: Iowa State. And the five losses were to KenPom #1, #2, #10, #16, and #22. Also noteworthy: after beating Illinois, 8-seed Arkansas and 5-seed Houston both knocked off a 1-seed in the next round. So yes, this is pretty much how the NCAA Tournament feels for fans of teams with those rankings at the end of the regular season (2026 expectations for the #9 team pending). One horrific loss to an 8-seed (Loyola), one solid upset of a 2-seed (Iowa State), and everything else mostly chalk.
Ben@BCD123_

@ALionEye You’d never guess with these regular season results (largely a function of having top-15 program resources) how all but one of these ncaa tournament performances have appeared so wildly outmatched against all but the worst few opponents.

English
13
10
165
23.6K
Ben
Ben@BCD123_·
I don’t believe simply “did we win or not compared to the moneyline” is a good metric - it would say winning by 1 in a game you where favored by 25 is the same as winning by 25 in a game you were supposed to win by 1. Which is why I go back to performance vs. the spread - because my point is not that BU doesn’t win more games than he doesn’t. It’s clear he does. The point is other good teams out-coach him more far more often than not in March.
English
1
0
1
43
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@BCD123_ @RayFinkle2013 @ALionEye I think we could test this theory. "When all information is factored into expectations set by a neutral observer at tip-off" is what vegas does best. Moneyline is better than spread here since the tourney is only about wins. What is BU's record vs the moneyline in the tourney?
English
1
0
1
55
Ben
Ben@BCD123_·
Precisely - this isn't specifically about winning or losing, it's about when all information is factored into expectations set by a neutral observer at tip-off, BU teams have a long track record of not coming close to meeting those expectations. Lose to a clearly better team? Fine. But don't look like you don't have answers when it matters most.
English
2
0
0
74
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@ALionEye Both Maryland games as Q3. Don't think I've ever seen a home-and-home both in the same non-Q1 quad before!
English
0
0
2
520
Robert Rosenthal
Robert Rosenthal@ALionEye·
The final Monday morning NET team sheet for 2026 because next Monday the bracket will already be out. ~Q1A is the story of the 2026 team sheet. 12 Q1A games. Only three teams nationally played 12 Q1A games: Illinois (6-6), Purdue (5-7), & Northwestern (1-11). ~USC dropping to #78 cost us a Quad 1 win. That's now Q2. ~Wisconsin up to #26 means no Quad 2 losses. All seven Illini losses were Q1. ~If we are a 2-seed on Sunday, credit scheduling four Q1A non-conference games (and winning two of them).
Robert Rosenthal tweet media
English
4
4
145
12.9K
Daniel Borup
Daniel Borup@daniel_borup·
@Isaac__Trotter I think so. Don't see us missing STL unless we're behind both Purdue and Iowa St. If we go 2-0 do you think we're pretty safe there?
English
0
0
0
37
Isaac Trotter
Isaac Trotter@Isaac__Trotter·
@daniel_borup You might know more than me here with that. I kinda get lost in the sauce with all the Big 12 teams jammed near the top of the seed list and trying to not break bracketing rules. St. Louis seems likely (probable?) in that scenario if it’s that cut-and-dry for the top-16
English
1
0
0
254
Robert Rosenthal
Robert Rosenthal@ALionEye·
Yeah, if we're a 2-seed on all mock brackets but a "3" shows up next to our name on Selection Sunday, it's going to be because of Wins Above Bubble. This Committee indicated they lean into it and we're currently 11th.
Bryce Smith@BryceSmith_27

@ALionEye Went from 7 to 11 in WAB 🫣

English
3
1
38
19.3K