پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
Gen
2.1K posts

Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا

The part Google left out of the tweet:
> Gemma 4 comes in 4 sizes. The biggest (31B) just ranked #3 in the entire world on Arena AI. That's where real users vote on which AI gives better answers. Out of every open model on earth. Third.
The 26B model is even more interesting.
It uses something called "Mixture of Experts."
In English: 26 billion parameters total, but only 4 billion activate per task. Like having 26 employees but only 4 show up to any meeting. That's why it runs on a regular laptop despite being massive.
How smart is it?
89.2% on AIME 2026. AIME is one of the hardest math competitions on the planet. Most humans fail it. This model nearly aced it.
Codeforces ELO of 2,150. That's competitive programmer territory. It writes code better than 95% of devs on the platform 😎
256K context window = it reads and understands roughly 200 pages of text at once.
The smallest version (2.3B effective) runs on a Raspberry Pi. The 26B runs in your browser. No server. No cloud. Your browser tab, via WebGPU.
And the license change matters more than the benchmarks.
Previous Gemma versions had usage restrictions on what you could build. Gemma 4 ships under Apache 2.0 for the first time. Build anything. Ship commercially. Modify the weights. Zero strings attached.
Google just gave away one of the best AI models. For free.
Google@Google
We just released Gemma 4 — our most intelligent open models to date. Built from the same world-class research as Gemini 3, Gemma 4 brings breakthrough intelligence directly to your own hardware for advanced reasoning and agentic workflows. Released under a commercially permissive Apache 2.0 license so anyone can build powerful AI tools. 🧵↓
English
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا

Use my code to buy a vape and get into Airdrop Season 2.
gen2pro.puffpaw.xyz/gen2?share_fro…
English

@sunshinevndetta @jessepollak @baseapp @baselatam @base This same thing happened to me but I used my main wallet which got drained.
English

Hi @jessepollak
I’m reaching out as a long-time @baseapp user and someone who consistently promotes it, helps onboard new users, and has brought high-profile people into the ecosystem because I genuinely trust the product and its direction.
I want to describe a concrete incident that exposed a serious gap in user protection, incident reporting, and escalation flow.
Last night, I was asked by someone to check a Base mini app and give feedback, specifically because I’m known as an active and experienced user who has helped with onboarding and testing in the past. I agreed and interacted with the mini app in good faith, strictly as a user evaluating it.
Shortly after that interaction, my wallet was drained.
At that moment, my priority was not assigning blame, but finding a clear path to resolution. I immediately looked for an official way inside the Base app to report a security incident or potential exploit. There was none. No in-app reporting mechanism, no emergency or security flag, and no guidance explaining what to do when funds are suddenly gone.
When I reached out through available Base-related channels, the only direction I received from Base team members was to “report it on Discord.”, without saying which server, or anything else, There was no specific channel, no clear ownership, no structured process, and no indication of what would happen after reporting. Telegram channels did not provide any additional clarity.
As someone who understands crypto and stays relatively composed under pressure, I was able to navigate the situation. However, this experience made me genuinely concerned about what would happen to a less technical or less connected user. A newer user could easily panic, assume everything is lost, or lose trust in Base entirely, simply because there is no visible, authoritative path that explains what to do, who handles it, and what happens next.
What makes this especially concerning is that the incident originated from a Base mini app. From a user perspective, mini apps feel endorsed by proximity. Users reasonably assume there is at least a basic safety or response protocol when something goes wrong.
From my perspective, the missing pieces are:
- An in-app incident or security reporting flow
- Clear ownership and escalation for wallet-related incidents
- Basic acknowledgment and guidance after a report is submitted
I’m not writing this as a complaint. I’m raising it because I actively advocate for Base, and this kind of edge case can quietly undermine user trust if it happens to the wrong person at the wrong time.
If this can happen to someone like me, who knows where to look and who to contact, it will be far worse for users who don’t.
This is the account that received the stolen funds:
base.app/profile/0x397D…
zora.co/0x397d93ac5b5b…
These are some of the transactions involved:
basescan.org/tx/0x8649102e2…
basescan.org/tx/0x8649102e2…
basescan.org/tx/0x8649102e2…
basescan.org/tx/0x8649102e2…
There are many more transactions, but these are included here exactly as reference.
I’m happy to provide full details of the interaction if needed. I felt it was important to raise this directly, as this is fundamentally about user safety, incident response, and trust as Base continues to scale.
Thanks for taking the time to read this,


English
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا

KAITO-KR Leaderboard: Week 1 rankings are out!
Top Performers:
@beingRich2000 , @wlgns5388 , @kimbunyu
and all the other winners!

English
Gen ری ٹویٹ کیا




