9Crypt Labs

@jonathan_wilke Humans needed an abstraction from the CLI... LLMs don't. So the pendulum is swinging back.

I don't get the hype around CLI coding tools like Claude Code. Human-computer interaction evolved past the terminal 30 years ago for a reason. UIs won. Why are we regressing?

Washington has made it illegal to talk to a computer

can't believe iran is getting $300 billion before i get my doge check :(

@getmoresunlight @zubinpahuja HAHAHA

@gotMeAHaskell @zubinpahuja Knife through hot butter or hot knife through butter?

claude code tip: running several claude sessions at once without them stepping on each other worktrees are the usual answer, and they're great for isolation, but they don't save you: two sessions editing the same file still collide at merge, and a shared checkout means one session's edits can ride into another's commit 2 layer fix: 1️⃣ prevent conflicts by construction. before building, cut the plan into "waves" where every parallel task has a disjoint set of files. 2 sessions are never assigned the same file, so there's nothing to conflict. no file-locking, no polling 2️⃣ verify nobody strayed. each task declares its file footprint as a Footprint: git commit trailer. a pre-push hook checks git diff main...HEAD stays inside it, if another session's edits leaked into your branch, or your task wandered off scope, the push is blocked bonus: a committer script i stole from @steipete that un-stages everything and commits only the exact paths you list, so git add . can never sweep a sibling session's work into your commit all git-native → works for codex/cursor/humans too. worktrees for isolation + disjoint waves for conflict-freedom + a footprint gate for proof 🚀

@minchoi I eat just like what you see on left. The controlled, slow eating on the right is so not realistic in my daily life.

3 years of AI progress Modelscope (left) Grok Imagine 1.5 (right)

@sflorimm HR

I am a founder scare me with 1 word

@ishanxtwt npm

I am a vibe coder. Scare me with one word.

When Fable launched, I spent 3-days using it to update all my systems -- my skills, subagents, prompt templates, hooks, and so on. When it got shut off, I was upset I didn't use it to actually "build" anything. But, now... man, I'm glad I did what I did.

The government still uses Windows 98 and pays contractors $300/hour to install WordPerfect on them. So, what do you expect?

Hey government, how about you get your own guardrails to work first? Ridiculous...

@ClaudeDevs Can we stop 'cleaning up worktree' if I exit Claude Code within a worktree that has no changes? Please?? Just give us the option if we want to keep it or not. So annoying.

We've got the full text of the Lutnick letter. Anthropic may well want to resolve this out of court, but the letter is legally deeply flawed: 1. There's no "export" here to restrict. The letter relies on EAR § 744.22, which allows BIS to restrict the export of "items" if there's an unacceptable risk they'll be used by adversary military or intelligence services. But Anthropic provides software-, or AI-, as-a-service, and services are not covered by export controls. Congress has considered adding remote access provisions that would cover digital services—the House passed a bill doing this in January—but these proposals are not yet law, and the current definitions of "item," "software," and "technology" in the statute (50 USC § 4801) and regulations (EAR § 772.1) do not cover services. 2. This restriction is geographically much broader than the underlying law allows. Section 744.22 applies to military and intelligence activities of a list of specific countries, include China and Russia. But the letter imposes worldwide restrictions. It's not clear how allowing nationals of close allies access to Mythos/Fable enables Chinese or Russian military or intelligence activity. G7 governments have asked for their access to be restored; under this law, it should be. 3. There are serious First Amendment problems. It's murky legal territory what 1A rights a developer has in its models, but US residents (even non-citizens) have 1A rights to receive information, which are likely being violated by the shutoff. Any speech restriction has to be narrowly tailored to the governmental interest. This is likely overbroad, in part because it covers citizens of countries not listed in the law. 4. In fact, the letter is so badly drafted it might not restrict API/chatbot access at all. It bars the export, reexport, and transfer of "Anthropic’s Claude Mythos 5 Model and Claude Fable 5 Model." The "model" in common parlance means the model weights, or perhaps the weights and the associated code and environment. As long as the weights are on a U.S. server, virtual access to the model through a structured interface doesn't "export" or "transfer" the model anywhere. Only information—queries and outputs—is transferred, not "the model." Anthropic may have over complied to show good faith, but it's not clear this order truly required shutting off model access. Stepping back, the administration reportedly believes there are serious security vulnerabilities created by the reported jailbreak and Anthropic hasn't done enough to address them. That may be true, we can't tell for sure from the outside. But the export control laws are not a roving license to ban unsafe products or punish companies the White House thinks are irresponsible. If the administration fears dangerous AI models, it should work with Congress to write laws to govern them.

What a farce.

@Polymarket The government ruins everything.

JUST IN: Trump officials conclude talks with Anthropic without lifting Claude Fable 5 restrictions over ongoing jailbreak concerns.

The government is not your mommy. FREE FABLE

@ThePrimeagen What will adding this do? ><{{{{''< ><>

high productivity hack with LLMs: add a :) at the end. Let it know you are happy and it will be happy Follow me for more tips

No way am I wasting my big $$$ in extra usage credits (for /fast) on Opus 4.8. I'm waiting for Fable 5 to return. This has to be hurting @AnthropicAI's pockets. I can't be the only person thinking this.

I cant afford groceries

We have this, but kids cancer research was deemed wasteful spending.