Learn2Discern

@skdh @graykevinb I never would’ve seen your video if it hadn’t popped up on my feed here on X. Thank you for posting!

@graykevinb the views here are so low, it's not worth the effort of even uploading the video

here is the video on the Riemann hypothesis that YouTube took down

@jordymaui I’m interested!

going to be building a community > vibe coders > openclaw users > hermes, claude code, codex users > curious AI folk who want to learn if any of these sound like you reply below, i’ll invite you early (not an engagement farm - excited for this!)

@julientalbot974 I'm just setting up my Hermes agent for the first time and using Grok 4.20 reasoning and in just an hour of basic back and forth it's already used a $1 in api. It's on v0.7.0. What model are you using as your main brain?

result: 8 agent instances running 24/7 with crons, tool calls, memory. estimated cost: ~$2/month. total. the formula isn't price per token. it's: price x cache miss rate x tool calls per session. fix the infrastructure. the model price is noise.

anthropic is killing oauth for agents. everyone is asking: "which model do we switch to? how much will it cost?" they're asking the wrong question.

🚨 BREAKING SPECIAL REPORT! IT’S ENDING: Trump’s Iran Strategy Revealed — And Britain’s Energy Empire Goes With It — BOOM! [VIDEO] 🚨 BREAKING — Trump’s full Iran strategy is now revealed. The war ends on U.S. terms while Britain’s energy empire collapses. A new energy world order begins. BOOM! 🚨 UK AND EUROPE: COLLAPSING UNDER GREEN FANTASY 👉 FULL STORY HERE: amg-news.com/breaking-speci… 🚨 VIDEO SOURCE: @PrometheanActn 📢 Join our Telegram channel: t.me/AMGNEWS2022 🌐 Real stories. True journalism. Together, we make an impact: amg-news.com

From Martin Iles, reposted: Having lived in the USA for nearly two years, I've realised something. The USA and the remainder of the Western world are no longer aligned. We all laugh and mock when the Americans say, "Freedom!" because we truly think we're as free as they are. Wrong. We're not. Not even close. The laws, the mindset, and the behaviour, is totally different in this regard. Most of all, the governments are totally different. The USA's convictions around core freedoms are on a scale we do not share. Meanwhile, Donald Trump wins the popular vote, the electoral college, the House, and the Senate... a man who, in every other Western country, is held in open derision, if not contempt. For these and other reasons, we are not the same. Yet the West, including Australia, fully expect to rely on the USA for our very survival. If the world turns bad (which will happen - only a question of time), then the whole West, without America, is toast. So, you may ask - if we're not very aligned ideologically, then it must be that we bring something to the party militarily? Well, no... actually... we don't matter that much militarily. The USA has about 470 ships in its navy, including 11 aircraft carriers, 69 submarines, 75 destroyers... plus 110 new ships in the pipeline. Australia has about 30, including 3 destroyers, 7 frigates and 7 outdated submarines. The UK does a little better, with about 60. Meanwhile, the US has over 14,000 military aircraft. A staggering number. Australia has 252 military aircraft. The UK has 556. The US army has just shy of 1,000,000 uniformed personnel in its military. Australia has about 45,000. The USA spends 3.4% ($968 billion) of its GDP on defence. Australia spends 2% ($36.4 billion). The US spends as much as the next 15 largest military-spending countries (including China) combined. The USA has a fighting culture. The men shoot things (a lot) and hunt things, the veterans get favoured in everything from parking spots to boarding planes. A uniformed young man is thanked in the street a dozen times a day. "Oh, the Americans and their guns!" we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs. How many young British men are willing to fight for their country? Now ask the same regarding young American men. The difference is about as wide as it could be. Militarily, we don't offer squat. Meanwhile, look at the way Australia works against America's interests by loving on China. China made us rich and we stay close. This is a Marxist regime with expansionist aims. Again, you have to spend time in the USA to realise just how vast a gulf there is between us on China. Europe, too. They let China have their way everywhere from Germany to Greenland, all the while importing Islam and sending their own people to court for saying hurty words. Somehow, we have landed the deal of a lifetime with the USA that says, "when the baddies come, you'll save us ok?" Because we can't save ourselves. And we live in peace. But we keep gnawing away at freedoms, keep enabling China, and get flabby and disinterested about our military because Uncle Sam's got it. And, let's be honest, Americans are widely looked down on. To add insult to injury, we don't think that highly of our protectors. So, the USA is finally saying "enough." I am here, I can tell you what the vibe is, and that's it. Trump is doing what people want in this regard. They're over it. And we come across all shocked and hard done by. We behave like people with no self-insight at all. Yes, the global alliance system is all over the place now. From America's perspective, it's about time. And I must say, though I be a proud Australian, I am forced to agree. Something has to change.

Food for thought. Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface. The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities. Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed. In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines. In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive. A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent. By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right. In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

In parallel with the A.I. tech race, there is an A.I. regulatory race. In that, I have a HUGE problem with a company like Anthropic seemingly leading the news today regarding A.I. safety. Anthropic’s leadership group is a hive of globalist/neocon/progressives that would love nothing more than to spearhead government regulation of A.I. When any organization seemingly CREATES a problem while simultaneously offering solutions, one should always be very suspicious. 🤨 🧵 (1/4)

@TommiPedruzzi ROI

The highest ROI AI business model in 2026 is: - Not an agency - Not building chatbots - Not automation services It’s something almost no one is talking about. But I’ve QUIETLY made $700,000 in the last 11 months doing this. And it compounds every month. • Without showing my face • Without revealing my name • Without any employees to manage All you need: ChatGPT, Claude, and 1 hour a day. I broke down the entire model in a 5+ hour training. With all my AI prompts and workflows. To get it: Like this post Comment “ROI” I’ll DM you the full system for free.

@starks_arq Druski

We made this viral Kitkat x Druski video in just 20 minutes... I just made a guide covering the complete workflow: - Agent pipeline - Storyboard flow - Video models And I'm giving it away for free Comment “DRUSKI” and RT to receive the full guide

@spwfeijen Nano

Google’s new Nano Banana 2 is F*cking crazy! I gave it one product photo... and it generated agency-level ads in under 2 minutes. No editor. No capcut. No $10k/month creative retainers. Then I combined it with my custom GPT pipeline — and suddenly my ads started looking like top 1% DTC brands... for $0. Honestly, it feels like something Google released by mistake. It’s almost unreal. Should I drop it? Comment "NANO" and I'll send it (must be following)

@markoilico Sweet I would love to try it!

If you're now designing or redesigning a website, this will help you a lot. I recently curated the best hero sections, footers, social proof and other website parts because I got tired of having 15+ tabs open (even with Mobbin). Giving it away 100% free. Comment on this post, and I'll send a Figma link to your inbox!

@jordan_ross_8F Openclaw

The founders who figure out OpenClaw in the next 90 days are going to look like geniuses in 2027. The problem is most agency owners don't have time to figure out the install, the security risks, where to start, or what to actually hand it first. So my team built a 48-page beginner's guide that does it for you. Inside: — The exact prompts to hand it on day one — Plain English setup for Mac and Windows — How to secure it so it doesn't burn your business down — 42 copy-paste workflows across sales, marketing, ops, and finance Your competitors are sleeping on this. Comment OPENCLAW and I'll send it.

@VadimStrizheus Clip

Vibe-marketing is cool and all but… having a 24/7 OpenClaw clipping agent that PRINTS VIEWS is 1000x better. All I do is paste a YT link: OpenClaw analyzes, clips, schedules, AND POSTS without me touching a SINGLE THING 🤫 Comment “Clip” and I’ll share my workflow.

LFG!

AI, clones, metamaterials, quantum technologies, hypersonics, and directed energy weapons. This is disclosure. Are you paying attention?

2026 has its rockstar - @bgarlinghouse 🤘 And this goes far beyond crypto or #XRP On drums: @JoelKatz • Piano: @NFAdotcrypto • Guitar: @SaluteXRPL

If we actually taught raw, unfiltered history in schools...the blood-soaked, soul-crushing truth instead of this sanitized, revisionist horseshit...the Left would lose half its recruiting pool overnight. Teach kids what the Bolsheviks actually did: a fanatical minority of intellectuals and agitators, drunk on Marxist poison, overthrew a crumbling regime in 1917 promising “peace, land, and bread.” What they delivered was the Red Terror...Cheka death squads executing 100,000–250,000 without trial, shooting priests in the street, drowning officers tied to planks, starving entire villages into submission. Teach the psychology: how Lenin’s “vanguard” justified any atrocity as “historically necessary,” how useful idiots in the West swooned over the “workers’ paradise” while millions were worked to death in the first Gulag camps. Then show how that same Bolshevik machine birthed Stalin’s Holodomor...engineered famine in Ukraine that starved 4–6 million while grain was exported. Mao’s Great Leap Forward that killed 30–45 million in the name of “equality.” Pol Pot’s killing fields where wearing glasses got you executed. Every single time. Teach the visceral pattern: utopian promises always slide into mass graves because power concentrates, resentment is weaponized, and humanity breaks under ideology. Teach that the road to hell is paved with moral grandstanding and envy dressed as justice. But no. Instead we get 1619 Project fanfiction, endless white guilt seminars, and lessons that paint America as uniquely evil while glossing over the fact that every civilization had slavery, conquest, and brutality...ours just happened to end it while others still practice it today. We don’t teach the why of human nature: tribalism, the will to power, how demagogues exploit the eternal human weakness for free shit and revenge fantasies. So when some blue-haired activist screams “eat the rich” or “defund the police” or “from the river to the sea,” millions of historically illiterate kids nod along because they’ve never seen what those slogans actually produce when tried in the real world. They’ve never smelled the mass graves. If we taught real history...ferocious, ugly, precise../they’d recognize the Bolshevik playbook being dusted off and run again right in front of them. Instead, we raise generations of useful idiots who think they’re on the right side of history while marching straight into the same fucking slaughterhouse their grandparents escaped. The Left needs historical amnesia to survive. That’s why they fight so hard to control the curriculum. Wake the fuck up. Teach the truth, blood, horrors and all, or watch the cycle repeat with fresh corpses. Fuck this revisionist, sanitized, soft bullshit. We are raising a nation of fucking pussies and useful idiots. 💀🔪

130 schools said no. He led the losingest program in college football history to a national championship anyway. Fernando Mendoza was a 2-star recruit from Miami. He tried to walk on at his hometown school. They passed. So did FIU. So did FAU. So did everyone else. At 17, he was sitting in his bedroom, crying over a silent recruiting inbox—after driving to 18 camps with his dad and sending highlights to more than 100 programs. Not one FBS offer. His only option? Yale. No scholarship. No NFL path. Everyone told him to be “realistic.” “Know your place.” “Be grateful.” He didn’t listen. Because Mendoza understood something most people miss: The worst outcome isn’t failing. It’s never getting the chance to try. Two weeks before signing day in 2022, his phone rang. Cal needed a body. One offer. Out of 134 schools. He took it. He arrived as the third-string quarterback. Spent a year on the scout team. Lost his first four starts. Got sacked 41 times behind a broken offensive line. Still got up. Every time. Then Cal brought in a transfer instead of building around him. So Mendoza left the only school that had ever said yes. He transferred to Indiana—the losingest program in college football history. People laughed. “Career suicide.” “Graveyard program.” “Nobody wins there.” One coach told him something different: “I’m going to make you the best Fernando Mendoza possible.” That was enough. Mendoza wasn’t just playing for football. His mother has battled multiple sclerosis for 18 years. Before every snap, he thought of her. “My mother is my why.” Indiana went 16–0. Beat six Top-10 teams. Won their first Big Ten title since 1945. Mendoza threw 41 touchdowns. Won the Heisman—first in school history. First Cuban-American to ever do it. Then came the title game. Miami. Near his hometown. Fourth-and-4. Season on the line. Quarterback draw. The kid 134 schools rejected spun through defenders and dove into the end zone. Game over. Indiana—national champions. The losingest program became the best team in America. All because a 17-year-old refused to believe “no” was the end. Rankings don’t decide your ceiling. Gatekeepers don’t write your ending. Being overlooked isn’t a verdict—it’s a starting point. Sometimes all you need is one shot… and the courage to bet on yourself when nobody else will. Don’t quit. Credit: Barclay Mullins

If Trump knew of this in advance, the Western hemisphere emphasis makes a lot more sense.