Mario Pastorelli

10.8K posts

Mario Pastorelli

Mario Pastorelli

@mapastr

Zürich, Switzerland شامل ہوئے Ocak 2011
1.2K فالونگ857 فالوورز
Mario Pastorelli ری ٹویٹ کیا
Tim Misiak
Tim Misiak@timmisiak·
All the principal engineers at Microsoft that I respect are completely comfortable with asking "dumb questions". When you don't feel like you have to prove your intelligence or worth, you learn more because you ask better questions.
English
24
179
1.8K
288.2K
Alex Rose
Alex Rose@AlexRoseGames·
anyone else getting a shit tonne of spam in the dms recently?
Alex Rose tweet media
English
51
7
175
0
Mario Pastorelli ری ٹویٹ کیا
Tim McNamara
Tim McNamara@timClicks·
I liked the Rust cliche, "systems programmers can have nice things" at first. But now it feels limiting, because Rust is so much more versatile than systems programming.
English
8
9
176
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
I wish more programming languages would dare to do things differently like Rust, Unisonweb and Erlang do. It's so refreshing to see new approaches to software development.
English
0
0
10
0
Mario Pastorelli ری ٹویٹ کیا
Luca Palmieri
Luca Palmieri@algo_luca·
The versatility that Rust brings to the table is just mind-blowing. With the exception of GUI/front-end work*, it's a viable choice at almost every level of the stack. Once mastered, it's the ultimate Swiss-army knife.
English
26
37
467
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
I don't like the "best of both worlds".
Mario Pastorelli tweet media
English
1
0
1
0
computer astridd
computer astridd@ifd3f·
Functional programmers are like the vegans of programming
English
83
259
3.1K
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
@vpatryshev @GabriellaG439 As an example, you don't have a IDE when you are reviewing a PR. You could of course load the changes locally and use your IDE but it's not very practical.
English
0
0
0
0
gabby
gabby@GabriellaG439·
My first impression of Rust's standard library is that it's similar to Scala's standard library, which is to say that both are pretty trait-heavy I'm personally not that keen on trait-heavy design because it's not great for inference and discoverability without IDE support
English
20
2
114
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
@hryz3 @GabriellaG439 As a Rust developer who used Scala a lot I struggle to understand this. For me the two languages use traits the same way but I'm still learning Rust. Can you show me a case where Rust traits are more powerful than Scala one?
English
0
0
0
0
🇨🇦 🇺🇦
🇨🇦 🇺🇦@hryz3·
@GabriellaG439 Rust traits are much more powerful than Scala ones. They can have associated types. The coolest thing is that you can create a trait and implement it for another trait. Btw, they are type bounds, not types. Rust traits are zero cost abstractions.
English
4
0
2
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
I'm trying Tauri to write multi platform applications. The final product is nice but I don't like using multiple languages and styles in the same app.
English
0
0
1
0
Mario Pastorelli ری ٹویٹ کیا
Bob Nystrom
Bob Nystrom@munificentbob·
@ShriramKMurthi Hot take: Programmers like minimalism in languages primarily for aesthetic/psychological reasons and the stated rational reasons (which do have some merit) are still mostly post hoc and don't fully justify. ...
English
12
8
88
0
Mario Pastorelli ری ٹویٹ کیا
Mara
Mara@m_ou_se·
Developers who say performance is more important than correctness.
Mag@magdraws

Mushroom Office

English
15
61
487
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
@fasterthanlime what you wrote really resonates with me. This part in particular. Thank you for the wonderful read!
Mario Pastorelli tweet media
English
0
0
0
0
gabby
gabby@GabriellaG439·
Happy Trans Day of Visibility! 🎉 I came out less than a year ago so this is my first time being publicly trans on this day
English
7
1
126
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
The entire email is a huge red flag but the question "Outside of class, what were your interests and where did you spend your time?" in the context of the email is particularly bad. The only valid answer is "That's none of your business".
English
0
0
1
0
Mario Pastorelli
Mario Pastorelli@mapastr·
This is bad and shows how bad managers at Canonical are. Avoid Canonical, there are better places with better people and you deserve better.
English
1
0
1
0