Wandering Nomad

What an incredible red-carpet delivery experience for my Signature Model S! Roberto Perez and Janette Ritchie from the Florida Mall Delivery Center, in perfect coordination with Danny Masih at Tesla John Young, made it absolutely unforgettable. As seen in the attached video, they went above and beyond to create a truly special delivery that matched the significance of this exquisite Signature Model S — the ultimate swan song of Franz’s beautiful design. It was clear the team understood just how special this final masterpiece is, and they delivered an experience worthy of both the vehicle and the occasion. Huge thanks to the whole Tesla team for the honor of owning such an amazing piece of Tesla history! @Tesla @travisraxelrod @TeslaIR @woodhaus2 @elonmusk @ #Tesla #SignatureModelS

The results from the FSD popup are in 😂 “Destination parking is by far the biggest reason people now intervene with FSD. Critical safety interventions are extremely rare.”

@SERobinsonJr @JoeTegtmeyer And ASML opened an office in between GigaTexas and Terafab Semiconductor supplier ASML to open in Hutto Co-Op District | Community Impact share.google/CEL22nX0AqaYP0…

Tesla FSD is 🪄. Need to be able to converse w/ Grok like we can with an Uber driver: “Hey Grok, turn right here.” “Drop us off right here, we'll walk due to traffic.” “Drop at entrance first, then park far away.” @Tesla_AI

AI is the new Climate Change.

The AI infrastructure boom is generating strong demand for skilled blue-collar workers. In fact, there’s a shortage of electricians, fiber technicians, and mechanical tradespeople needed to build and maintain AI data centers. Meta’s new $115M America’s Workforce Academy provides paid training plus job guarantees for exactly these roles. This is the kind of practical jobs training program that we need more of.

"AI safety" is pretty clearly the bureaucratic successor to the misinformation lobby

💥NEW: @DavidSacks: “Do not deny the evidence of your eyes and ears — even if they call you an election denier. I personally don’t care. I deny it.” “Spencer Pratt should be in the runoff. I deny that Raman won legitimately.”

Narrative violation.

Some recent articles have created a misleading narrative that I did not take Mythos seriously or tried to downplay the cyber threat. This is based on egregious cherry-picking of my comments and (since the real target is the Trump Administration) needs to be corrected. When Mythos Preview first launched, I pointed out that Anthropic has a history of scare tactics, but then immediately went on to say that “we have no choice but to take this seriously” and that every CISO and IT department should move quickly to harden systems against AI-powered cyberattacks. Here’s what I said on the April 10 All-In Podcast (3 days after launch of Mythos Preview): “Anytime Anthropic is scaring people, you have to ask, is this a tactic, is this part of their chicken little routine, or is it real? With cyber, I actually would give them credit in this case and say, this is more on the real side. “It just makes sense that as the coding models become more and more capable, they’re more capable of finding bugs. That means they’re more capable of finding vulnerabilities. That means they’re more capable of stringing together multiple vulnerabilities and creating an exploit. “I do think that every company, or IT department, or CISO that is managing code bases should take this seriously and use the next few months to detect any dormant bugs or vulnerabilities and roll out patches.” I posted similar framing on X: On April 10: “The world has no choice but to take the cyber threat associated with Mythos seriously. But it’s hard to ignore that Anthropic has a history of scare tactics.” (With examples attached). On April 12: I noted that a growing number of people were wondering if Anthropic was the AI industry’s “boy who cried wolf,” and that the company would face a serious credibility problem if the threats didn’t materialize. These are the lines the articles highlight. They emphasize the “scare tactics” / “boy who cried wolf” critique while omitting the parts where I said the cyber threat itself was real and required immediate action. It is entirely possible to question a messenger’s track record while still treating the underlying risk as serious — and that’s exactly what I did. By the way, this view isn’t unique to me or even particularly controversial; highly respected tech commentator Ben Thompson recently made a similar critique about Anthropic. On April 30 I posted a more technical thread after tests by the AI Security Institute showed that GPT-5.5-Cyber performed similarly to Mythos: “Mythos is not magic. It’s not a doomsday device. It’s the first of many models that can automate cyber tasks (just like coding). … these models do not create vulnerabilities; they discover them. The bugs are already in the code. Using AI to discover and patch them will actually harden these systems. “The leap from pre-AI cyber to post-AI cyber means that there will be a big upgrade cycle. … it’s important that cyber defenders get access before cyber attackers. That process is already underway but needs to happen quickly.” My position remains consistent: We are on a shot clock until Mythos-level capabilities diffuse widely, including to non-U.S. / Chinese models. We need defenders to find and patch vulnerabilities before that happens. This requires cooperation between government and industry. Unfortunately Anthropic’s needlessly confrontational posture toward the Administration has distracted from that mission. Policy debates have their time and place, but right now tangible defensive action is what matters most. I hope everyone moves forward on that basis.

Yes

@beffjezos NAACP doesn't give a shit about the environment. If an an endangered species told a racist joke they'd probably want it extinct. They just despise an AI that's aligned to truth rather than political correctness and also despise Elon for political reasons. Lawfare slimeballs.

@beffjezos I couldn’t have said it and better my self. I’m glad 𝕏 is litterally stitching the shared consensus of neo American exceptionalism into the hybrid core of the “American language model” Even before @neuralink drops👨🏽‍🚀

This is why the supporters of @elonmusk work hard to "defend him." Because it's not about Elon. He's a symbol of progress.

Chud: nothing ever happens Yud: if something happens, everyone dies

@BullTheoryio NGOs that generically oppose progress made by anyone outside their tent are a national security threat.

@BullTheoryio We will have a chance against China when "environmental lawsuits" are just a bad memory. They are tools of plunder for evil people.

@BullTheoryio Not sure how the NAACP has any legal standing to sue. Plus, it’s racist against African-American immigrants like Elon

BREAKING: The US DOJ just declared Elon Musk's AI data center a national security asset and blocked an environmental lawsuit against it. The NAACP filed a lawsuit against xAI in April 2026 under the Clean Air Act, alleging the company is operating dozens of gas turbines without the required air permits to power its Colossus 2 data center. The turbines are located in Southaven, Mississippi, just across the state line from the data center in South Memphis, Tennessee. Since the lawsuit was filed, the number of turbines has grown from 27 to 57. xAI says that the turbines are legally exempt from Mississippi air permitting requirements because they are mounted on trailers and classified as temporary mobile equipment. On Monday, the Department of Justice intervened in the case, filing court papers arguing that shutting down the turbines would “threaten American national, economic, and energy security.” The DOJ stated that the power supply supports U.S. military AI operations. Cameron Stanley, the Defense Department’s Chief Digital and AI Officer, submitted a declaration stating that Grok is one of only four AI models currently cleared for mission critical operations across Secret and Top Secret classified government networks, and that it has been used in recent U.S. military operations against Iran. The DOJ, xAI, and the state of Mississippi are jointly asking the court to dismiss the case.

Holy based and acceleration-pilled 🥹